Constitutionalisation of the Right to Abortion

Authors

  • Gabriela Nemtoi Associate Professor PhD, "Ştefan cel Mare" University of Suceava, Faculty of Law and Administrative Sciences, Suceava, Romania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/eljpa/11.1/216

Keywords:

European Parliament Resolution, constitutionalisation of the right to abortion, cultural rights, European Court of Human Rights

Abstract

Enshrining the right to abortion in the constitution represented an ideal in many states that faced this issue or restrictions that led to the loss of human life. The phenomenon gained momentum in the European space after the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in the Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health (Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization, 2022). I mentioned the decision, by which the Court annulled the right to abortion, offering the possibility to waive this right to the national authorities. The rise of extremist religious groups in the European space made the right to abortion a controversial subject, which is why the phenomenon was left to the discretion of the national state from a decision-making perspective. However, in the EU, the European Parliament alerted in time the threats posed to the rights to abortion requesting that this right be introduced in the EU Convention of Rights (European Parliament Resolution, 2022; European Parliament Resolution, 2024). Rounding off the decision to implement the right to abortion in the constitution generated at the national level a real debate for and against, which in the European space ended with some changes such as states that have adopted this right: France (French legislative proposal no. 293, 2023), Belgium (Parl. doc. 55 2832/001 (2021-2022), Norway, and Sweden (Press release Department of Justice, 2023). Against this reaction, legal experts questioned the necessity, adequacy and added value of the constitutionalisation (Dobner M. Loughlin, 2010) of a right to abortion in European-national contexts.

References

Center for Reproductive Rights (n.d.) (2023), The World’s Abortion Laws, Center for Reproductive Rights. https://reproductiverights.org/maps/worlds-abortion-laws/

Chambre des représentants de Belgique (2022). Proposition de revision de l’Article 22 din Constitution en vue de reconnaître le droit à l’interruption volontaire de grossesse. DOC 55 2832/001. https://www.dekamer.be/FLWB/PDF/55/2832/55K2832001.pdf

Champeil-Desplats, V. (2019). Théorie générale des droits et libertés. Dalloz.

Cook, R. J., & Dickens, B. M. (2003). Human rights dynamics of abortion law reform. Human rights quarterly, 25(1), 1–59. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2003.0003

De Meyer, F., & Romainville, C. (2024). Constitutionalising a Right to Abortion: Unveiling its Transformative Potential Amidst Challenges in Europe. European Constitutional Law Review, 20(3), 361–391. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019624000257

Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization. (2022). https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/19-1392_6j37.pdf

ECHR (December 14, 2023). Case of M.L. v. Poland (application no. 40119/21) para. 93-94, https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-229424%22]}

ECHR (December 16, 2010). In the case of A, B and C v. Ireland, No. 25579/05, A, B and C v. Ireland, para. 213-214; https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-102332%22]}

European Parliament (2024). Inclusion of the right to abortion in the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, 11 of April 2024, B9-0205/2024, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2024- 0286_EN.html

European Parliament Resolution (2022). Global Threats to Abortion Rights: Possible Overturn of US Abortion Rights by the Supreme Court, 9 of June 2022, P9_TA(2022)0243, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/ document/TA-9-2022-0243_EN.html

European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. (n.d.). The Belgian Constitution. Article 25. https://fra.europa.eu/en/law-reference/belgian-constitution

French legislative proposal no. 293. Proposition de loi constitutionnelle visant à protéger et à garantir le droit fondamental à l’interruption volontaire de grossesse’. http://www.senat. fr/dossier-legislatif/ppl22-143.html

Hennette-Vauchez, S., Roman, D., & Slama, S. (2022). Pourquoi et comment constitutionnaliser le droit à l’avortement. La Revue des droits de l’homme. Revue du Centre de recherches et d’études sur les droits fondamentaux. https://doi.org/10.4000/revdh.14979

Hunt, L. (2015). The Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, August 1789: A Revolutionary Document. In R. Hammersley (Ed.). Revolutionary Moments: Reading Revolutionary Texts (pp. 77–84). London: Bloomsbury Academic. Retrieved November 13, 2024, from http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781474252669.0016

Lessard H. (1991). Relationship, particularity, and change: reflections on R. v. Morgentaler and feminist approaches to liberty. McGill law journal. Revue de droit de McGill, 36(2), 263–307

Loughlin, M. (2010). What is Constitutionalisation?, in P. Dobner & M. Loughlin (eds.) The Twilight of Constitutionalism?, Oxford Constitutional Theory (Oxford, 2010; online edn, Oxford Academic, 1 May 2010), https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199585007.003.0003, accessed 14 Nov. 2024

Ministry of Justice (2023). The government appoints a constitutional committee to investigate some questions about fundamental freedoms and rights. https://www.regeringen.se/pressmeddelanden/2023/06/regeringen-tillsatter-en-grundlagskommitte-som-ska-utreda-nagra-fragor-om-grundlaggande-fri--och-rattigheter/

Proposition de revision de l’Article 22 din Constitution en vue de reconnaître le droit à l’interruption volontaire de grossesse/Voorstel tot herziening van artikel 22 van de Grondwet met het oog op de erkenning van het recht op vrijwillige zwangerschapsafbreking, Parl. doc. 55 2832/001 (2021-2022), 28 of June 2022, https://www.dekamer.be/kvvcr/showpage.cfm?section=flwb&language=nl&cfm=/site/wwwcfm/flwb/flwbn.be/kvvcr/showpage.cfm?section=flwb&language=nl&cfm=/site/wwwcfm/flwb/flwbn . =55&inst=K

Press release Department of Justice, „Regeringen tillsätter en grundlagskommitté som ska utreda några frågor om grundläggande fri- och rättigheter” [The government appoints a constitutional committee to investigate some questions about fundamental freedoms and rights], https://www.regeringen.se/ pressmeddelanden/2023/06/regeringen-tillsatter-en-grundlagskommitte-som-ska-utreda-nagra-fragor-om-grundlaggande-fri--och-rattigheter/,

Scientific Committee for the Evaluation of Abortion Law and Practice in Belgium (April 2023). Study and Evaluation of Abortion Law and Practice in Belgium. (Dutch version), https://vlir.be/nieuws/studie-en-evaluatie-van-de-abortuswet-en-praktijk-in-belgie/

Storninget (2022). Constitutional proposal, 2022-2023, Document 12:1 (2022-2023). Constitutional proposal from Ingvild Wetrhus Thorsvik, Guri Melby, Grunde Almeland, Ane Breivik, Abid Raja and Alfred Jens Bjørlo on new section 103 (on the right to voluntarily terminate one's own pregnancy) https://www. .stortinget.no/no/Saker-og-publikasjoner/Publikasjoner/Grunnlovsforslag/2022-20232/dok12-202223-001

Wattier, S. (2022). Faut-il constitutionnaliser le droit à l’avortement?: Réflexions au départ de l’expérience des États-Unis. Journal des Tribunaux, (6921), 832-837.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-03

How to Cite

Nemtoi, G. (2024). Constitutionalisation of the Right to Abortion. European Journal of Law and Public Administration, 11(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.18662/eljpa/11.1/216

Issue

Section

International Law. European Law. Comparative Law.