Considerations on the Need to Legislate in the Field of Surrogacy

Authors

  • Loredana Terec-Vlad Ștefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania; Titu Maiorescu University, Bucharest, Romania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/eljpa/11.2/249

Keywords:

surrogacy, legislative process, medically assisted human reproduction

Abstract

Through scientific research, humanity transcends the boundaries of its biological condition and the genetic potential of the species, as the evolution of medical technologies makes possible certain modifications of the imperatives drawn by the limits of human evolution (Vlad, 2019). Human creativity is no longer limited to art, but also manifests itself in the scientific field, when scientists decide to no longer submit to species predeterminism, to oppose it, with all the ethical dilemmas that result from this, as well as all the legislative innovations involved. One field that has generated such transformations in recent years is medically assisted human reproduction, in all its forms, as there are numerous medical techniques for reproduction with the help of contemporary medicine, some of which are more controversial than others. Some of these techniques have already entered common medical practice, such as fertility and pregnancy maintenance treatments, while others await ethical validation to be implemented on a large scale. A third category is that of treatments that are still in the experimental stage, such as solo reproduction (Cutaș & Smajor) or cloning (Taylor, 2005).

Author Biography

Loredana Terec-Vlad, Ștefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania; Titu Maiorescu University, Bucharest, Romania

 

References

Bhatia, K., Martindale, E. A., Rustamov, O., & Nysenbaum, A. M. (2009). Surrogate pregnancy: An essential guide for clinicians, The Obstetrician and Gynaecologist, 11(1), 49–54. https://doi.org/10.1576/toag.11.1.49.27468

Brinsden, P. R. (2003). Gestational surrogacy, Human Reproduction Update, 9(5), 483–491. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmg033

Buțureanu, Ș. & Lupșan, G. (2001). O provocare interdisciplinară: reproducerea medical asistată [An interdisciplinary challenge: medically assisted reproduction]. Junimea.

Collins, J. A. (1994). Reproductive technology. The price of progress. New England Journal of Medicine, 331(4), 270-271. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199407283310412

Cutaș, D., Smajdor, A. (2017). I am your mother and your father! - In vitro derived gametes and the ethics of solo reproduction. Health Care Analysis, 25(4), 354-369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-016-0321-7

Direcția de Investigare a Infracțiunilor de Criminalitate Organizată și Terorism (DIICOT) [Directorate for the Investigation of Organized Crime and Terrorism]. (2014). DIICOT: 12 mame surogat implicate în traficul cu ovule umane de la spitalul Athena din Timișoara [DIICOT: 12 surrogate mothers involved in human egg trafficking from Athena Hospital in Timișoara]. https://www.agerpres.ro/justitie/2014/05/30/diicot-12-mame-surogat-implicate-in-traficul-cu-ovule-umane-de-la-spitalul-athena-din-timisoara-14-54-02

Falasco, J. R. (2005). Frozen embryos and gamete providers’ rights: A suggested model for embryo disposition. Jurimetrics, 45(3), 273–300. http://www.jstor.org/stable/29762898

Huidu, A. (2019). The need for specific and unitary regulations regarding techniques in connection to or derived from medically assisted human reproduction in Romania. Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty: Law, 6(2), 14-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.18662/lumenlaw/09

Ionescu, V., & Magradean, V. (2016, October 22). Miting pentru familia tradiţională la Oradea [Rally for the traditional family in Oradea]. http://www.mediafax.ro/social/miting-pentru-familia-traditionala-la-oradea-familia-bodnariu-a-fost-prezenta-la-eveniment-s-a-cerut-un-referendum-pe-aceasta-tema-video-15845435

Ministry of Health. (2011). Ordinul ministrului sănătății nr. 765/2011 pentru aprobarea Normelor metodologice pentru realizarea și raportarea activităților specifice în cadrul subprogramului de fertilizare in vitro [Order of the Minister of Health No. 765/2011 for the approval of the Methodological Norms for the implementation and reporting of specific activities within the in vitro fertilization subprogram]. Monitorul Oficial al României, 378, 2011, May 05.

Morar, S., & Dura, H. (2005). Coordonatele etice ale reproducerii asistate medical [The ethical coordinates of medically assisted reproduction]. Revista Română de Bioetică, 3(3), 55-59.

Romanian Constitution. (1991). Monitorul Oficial al României, 758, 2003, October 29 (republished).

Romanian Government. (2010). Hotărârea de Guvern nr. 1388/2010 privind aprobarea programelor naționale de sănătate pentru anii 2011 și 2012 [Government Decision No. 1388/2010 on the approval of the national health programs for 2011 and 2012]. Monitorul Oficial al României, 893, 2011, January 31.

Romanian Government. (2013). Hotărârea de Guvern nr. 124/2013 privind aprobarea programelor naționale de sănătate pentru anii 2013 și 2014 [Government Decision No. 124/2013 on the approval of the national health programs for 2013 and 2014]. Monitorul Oficial al României, 172, 2013, March 29. https://legislatie.just.ro/Public/DetaliiDocument/146489

Romanian Government. (2015). Hotărârea de Guvern nr. 206/2015 privind aprobarea programelor naționale de sănătate pentru anii 2015 și 2016 [Government Decision No. 206/2015 on the approval of the national health programs for 2015 and 2016]. Monitorul Oficial al României, 208, 2015, March 30.

Romanian Government. (2017). Hotărârea de Guvern nr. 155/2017 privind aprobarea programelor naționale de sănătate pentru anii 2017 și 2018 [Government Decision No. 155/2017 on the approval of the national health programs for 2017 and 2018]. Monitorul Oficial al României, 222, 2017, March 31.

Romanian Government. (2018). Hotărârea de Guvern nr. 140/2018 pentru aprobarea pachetelor de servicii şi a Contractului-cadru care reglementează condiţiile acordării asistenţei medicale, a medicamentelor şi a dispozitivelor medicale în cadrul sistemului de asigurări sociale de sănătate pentru anii 2018-2019 [Government Decision No. 140/2018 for the approval of the service packages and the Framework Contract regulating the conditions for the provision of medical assistance, medicines and medical devices within the social health insurance system for the years 2018-2019]. Monitorul Oficial al României, 270, 2018, March 27. http://www.casan.ro/casalba/media/postFiles/HG%20140-CONTRACT%20CADRU%202018-2019.pdf

Romanian Parliament. (2006). Legea nr. 95/2006 privind reforma în domeniul sănătății [Law No. 95/2006 on healthcare reform]. Monitorul Oficial al României, 372, 2006, April 28.

Schoysman, R. (2003). Solutions extrêmes en reproduction humaine [Extreme solutions in human reproduction]. Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité, 31(2), 107-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1297-9589(03)00008-0

Taylor, R. (2005). Reproductive technology: From artificial insemination to cloning. Life Issues, 2. http://www.lifeissues.net/writers/tayl/tayl_02reprotechnology.html

Teman, E. (2010). Birthing a mother. The surrogate body and the pregnant self. University of California Press.

Vlad, L. (2019). Umanism, transumanism, postumanism. Perspective filosofice [Humanism, transhumanism, posthumanism. Philosophical perspectives]. Lumen.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-20

How to Cite

Terec-Vlad, L. (2024). Considerations on the Need to Legislate in the Field of Surrogacy. European Journal of Law and Public Administration, 11(2), 280-290. https://doi.org/10.18662/eljpa/11.2/249