CONSIDERATIONS ON THE REESTABLISHMENT OF THE BALANCE BETWEEN THE PARTIES OF A CREDIT AGREEMENT

Authors

  • Camelia Maria Cezara IGNATESCU Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/eljpa.2014.0102.07

Keywords:

Abusive clauses, credit agreement, balance of contract, reestablishment, imprevision.

Abstract

The matter of unfair terms in credit agreements raised a number of disputes related to the qualification of this particular type of contract in the category of synalagmatic legal instruments or that of membership agreements. The jurisprudence currently in force, founded on the new legislation, admitted — in a significant percentage — the actions promoted by the debtors, aiming at reestablishing the balance between the parties of the credit agreement. Surprisingly, even after the entrance into force of the GEO 50/2010, regarding the credit agreement for consumers, the banks continued to stipulate disconform provisions. In what regards the business credit agreement, although this kind of contract did not benefit from a special law, the situation of the debtor suffered a reevaluation by means of the imprevision regulation. The current research addresses to an objective and equidistant analysis of the proposed matter.

References

Dogaru, I., Popa, N., Danisor, D. C., Cercel, S., 2008, Bazele dreptului civil, vol. I, C. H. Beck Publishing House, Bucharest, p. 1239.

Albu, I., 1994, Drept civil. Contractul si raspunderea contractuala, Dacia Publishing House, Cluj Napoca, p. 28.

Nitoiu, R., 2003, Teoria generala a contractelor aleatorii, All Beck Publishing House, Bucharest, p. 9.

Zamsa, C. E., 2006, Teoria impreviziunii, Hamangiu Publishing House, Bucharest, p. 36, apud. Gh. Beleiu, Teoria Impreviziunii - rebus sic standibus - In dreptul civil, Revista Dreptul no. 10-11/1993

Chelaru, E., 2003, Forta obligatorie a contractului, teoria impreviziunii in competenta in materie a instanTelor judecatoresti, Revista Dreptul no. 9/2003, pp. 49-50.

Pop, L., 2009, Tratat de drept civil. Obligatile. vol. II, Universul Juridic Publishing House, Bucharest, p. 540.

Chelaru, E., 2003, Forta obligatorie a contractului, teoria impreviziunii si competenta in materie a instantelor judecatoresti, Revista Dreptul no. 9/2003, p. 48.

Zamsa, C. E., 2006, Teoria impreviziunii, Hamangiu Publishing House, Bucharest, 2006, p. 48.

Duminica, R., Aleca, C., 2012, Consideration concerning the regulation of the theory of unforeseeability in comparative law, Issues of Business and Law volume 4/2012, p. 66.

Downloads

Published

2014-08-28

How to Cite

IGNATESCU, C. M. C. (2014). CONSIDERATIONS ON THE REESTABLISHMENT OF THE BALANCE BETWEEN THE PARTIES OF A CREDIT AGREEMENT. European Journal of Law and Public Administration, 1(2), 73-80. https://doi.org/10.18662/eljpa.2014.0102.07

Section

Articles