Training Dragons... The Dragon Archetype as the Contradictions, Paradoxes and Dialectics of Organizations. A Study in NLP
Keywords:Archetype, dragon archetype, NLP (Neuro Linguistic Programming), paradoxes, binds, nested levels, assumptions
AbstractThis article presents the archetype of the dragon as well as the realities it refers to – the contradictions, paradoxes and dialects lurking in any organization. And the NLP (Neuro Linguistic Programming) studies could fit in this complex model. More specifically, their elements – namely: i) the paradoxes, ii) the binds, and iii) the nested levels could exemplify the dynamics of the dragon archetype. Near the end of the article, the author proposed other solutions based on assumptions (instead of the nested levels): these proposed solutions are rather advices and guesses than hard and scientific facts. For who can guarantees that science is the final answer to life and eternity?
Bandler, R., & Grinder, J. (1975). The structure of magic (1st vol.), A book about language and therapy. Palo Alto, USA: Science and Behavior Books.
Bandler, R., & Grinder, J. (1977). Patterns of the hypnotic techniques of Milton H. Erickson, M.D. (1st vol.). Toronto, Canada: Meta Publications
Bane, T. (2016). Encyclopedia of beasts and monsters in myth, legend, and folklore. Jefferson, USA: McFarland & Company.
Bateson, G. (1977). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York, USA: Ballantine Books.
Chaucer, G., & Hopper, V. (1970). Chaucer’s Canterbury tales. Hauppauge, USA: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc.
Cheal, J. (2008a). Solving impossible problems. Carmarthen, UK: Crown House Publishing
Cheal, J. (2008b). Exploring the role of NLP in the management of organizational paradox. In P. Tosey (Ed), Current research in NLP (1st vol.) (pp. 35-50). Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b1de/6262ff5dfbbdff5342d6761b76fc28 531cb9.pdf?_ga=2.11066996.1921520363.1578996063- 1215171703.1564393149
Clegg, S., & Pina E Cunha, M. (2017). Organizational dialectics. in W. Smith, M. Lewis, P. Jarzabkowski & A. Langley (Eds), The Oxford handbook of organizational paradox. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198754428.013.5
Dilts, R. (1990). Changing belief systems with NLP. Toronto, Canada: Meta Publications
Dilts, R. (1994). Strategies of genius (1st vol.). Toronto, Canada: Meta Publications
Dilts, R. (1998). Double binds, part 1 & part 2 [Video file]. Videotaped at the Institute for the Advanced Study of Health, 5th annual conference.
Dilts, R. (2003). From coach to awakener. Toronto, Canada: Meta Publications
Dilts, R., & DeLozier, J. (2000). Encyclopedia of systemic Neuro-Linguistic Programming and NLP new coding. Retrieved from http://www.nlpu.com/NLPU.html
Gardner, M. (1960). Mathematical puzzles of Sam Loyd (2nd vol.). Chicago, USA. Dover Publications, Inc.
Gardner, M. (1967). Les casse-tête mathématiques de Sam Loyd [Mathematical puzzles of Sam Loyd] (2nd vol.). Paris, France: Dunod
Greer, J. M. (2011). Monsters. Woodbury, USA: Llewellyn Publications.
Hayakawa, S. I. (1952). Language in thought and action. Crows Nest, Australia: George Allen & Unwin LTD
Heller, J. (1996). Catch-22. New York, USA: Simon & Schuster. Holy Bible, American Standard Version. Retrieved from http://www.gospelhall.org/bible/bible.php?passage=Titus
Jung, C. G. (1960). Psychogenesis of mental disease (3rd vol.). Princeton, USA: Bollingen Series XX.
Jung, C. G. (1968). Analytical psychology. New York, USA: Vintage Books.
Jung, C. G. (1969). Archetypes and the collective unconscious (9th vol.). Princeton, USA: Bollingen Series XX
Jung, C. G. (2001). Four archetypes. Abingdon-on-Thames, UK: Rutledge.
Korzybski, A. (2000). Science and sanity. Forest Hills, USA: Institute of General Semantics.
Kostera, M. (2012). Organizations and archetypes. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
Lawley, J. (2000). Modelling the structure of binds and double binds. Retrieved from http://www.cleanlanguage.co.uk
Lawley, J. (2013). What are double binds? Retrieved from http://www.cleanlanguage.co.uk
Lawley, J., & Tompkins, P. (2003). Metaphors in mind. Transformation through symbolic modelling. USA: The Developing Company Press
Loyd, S. (1914). Cyclopedia of puzzles. New York, USA: The Lamb Publishing Company.
Maier, N. (1930). Reasoning in humans. On direction. Journal of comparative psychology, 10(2), 115-143. doi:10.1037/h0073232
Mavrodes, G. (1963). Some puzzles concerning omnipotence. The Philosophical Review, 72(2), 221-223. doi:10.2307/2183106
Moore, R. (2003). Facing the dragon. Asheville, USA: Chiron Publications.
Orwell, G. (1949). 1984. London, UK: Secker & Warburg
Putnam, L., Fairhurst , G., & Banghart, S. (2016). Contradictions, dialectics and paradoxes in organizations: A constitutive approach. The Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 65-171. doi:10.1080/19416520.2016.1162421
Russell, B. (2010a). Principles of mathematics. Abingdon-on-Thames, UK: Rutledge Classics.
Russell, B. (2010b). The philosophy of logical atomism. Abingdon-on-Thames, UK: Rutledge Classics.
Satir, V. (1988). The new peoplemaking. Palo Alto, USA: Science and Behavior Books, Inc.
Satir, V., Banmen, J., Gerber, J., & Gomori, M. (1991). The Satir model. Palo Alto, USA: Science and Behavior Books, Inc.
Savage, W. (1967). The paradox of the stone. The Philosophical Review, 76(1), 74-79. doi:10.2307/2182966
Scheerer, M. (1963). Problem-solving. Scientific American, 200(4), 118-132. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0463-118
Suciu, G. (2011). Multiple intelligences. Revista de Asistenţă şi Mediere Socială, 49-59.
Watzlawick, P. (1976). How real is real? New York, USA: Vintage Books.
Watzlawick, P., Helmick Beavin, J., & Jackson, D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication. New York, USA: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.
Watzlawick, P., Weakland, J., & Fisch, R. (1974). Change. Principles of problem formation and problem solving. New York, USA: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.
How to Cite
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
JMSW Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs