The Ethics of Vulnerability in the Posthuman Era

Authors

  • Persida Bec PhD. Student, Doctoral School of Philosophy, Faculty of History and Philosophy, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, 1 Mihail Kogălniceanu Street, 400084, Romania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/jsmi/2.1/4

Keywords:

vulnerability, posthuman, ethics, human being, nature-culture, complexity

Abstract

Beyond the topics of genre and species, the problem of vulnerability arises in terms of posthumanism, which alternates on an empirical basis and also criticizes a rethinking of the human. Whether human, plant or animal, or robot or any hybrid being, every one of them becomes entities for posthumanism with equal dignity, endowed with the ability to enter into symbiosis and be part of a much more complex vulnerability. Thus, appears the reconsideration of the nature-culture duality in a position of equidistance and of equal value given alike to the human or animal kingdom. It is said that in the beginning there was only the classical ideal of "Man", which first appeared under the formulation given by Protagoras as "the measure of all things", which was later reformulated in the Italian Renaissance in the form of a universal model, represented by Leonardo da Vinci's Vitruvian Man. The ideals of Classical Antiquity and the Italian Renaissance came to be reconsidered in posthumanism, and what was considered to be part of human supremacy has reached a level equal to that which is part of the animal kingdom. The intensity created by these two parts is based on the division of this planet in ways that are no longer so hierarchical to the position of superiority that the human being assumes. Therefore, the importance of reformulating subjectivity in terms of the current vulnerability in posthumanism is needed, but also the need to invent new forms of ethical relationships or values encountered in the complexity of modern times.

References

Auner, J. (2014). Cântă-mi. Ventrilocia postumană în muzica populară recentă. În D. Clinci. Post/h/um, Jurnal de studii (post)umaniste, vol. I, pp. 98-122. Retrieved from: https://posthum.ro/joseph-auner-canta-mi-ventrilocia-postumana-in-muzica-populara-recenta/.

Badmington, N. (2014). Teoretizarea postumanismului. În S. Cotoară. Post/h/um, Jurnal de studii (post)umaniste, vol. I, pp.10-27. Retrieved from: https://posthum.ro/post-h-um-1/neil-badmington-teoretizarea-postumanismului/

Beauchamp, T.L., Childress, J.F. (1994). Principles of Biometrical Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.

Bostrom, N. (2003). The Transhumanist FAQ. A general introduction. In Version 2.1, World Transhumanist Association, pp. 1-56. Retrieved from: https://www.nickbostrom.com/views/transhumanist.pdf.

Braidotti, R. (2016). Postumanul. București: Hecate.

Cincu, R. (2017). După moartea omului. Vatra, vol. 1. Retrieved from: https://revistavatra.org/2017/05/08/postumanismbaul-110/.

Foucault, M. (2002). The Order of Things—An archaeology of the human sciences. London and New York: Routledge.

Frunză, M. (2011). Expertiză etică și acțiune socială. București: Tritonic.

Frunză, M. (2009). Tematizări în eticile aplicate—perspective feministe. Cluj-Napoca: Limes.

Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinventation of Nature. New York: Routledge.

Nietzsche, F. (1996). Aşa grăit-a Zarathustra: o carte pentru toţi şi nici unul. București: Humanitas.

Nowotny, H., & Gibbons, M. (2001). The Potential of Transdisciplinarity. În Transdisciplinarity: Joint Problem Solving among Science, Technology, and Society. J. Thompson Klein, R. Häberli, et al. (pp. 67-80). Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag.

Oancea, N. R. (2017). Artă, tehnologie și postumanism. În Scena 9. Retrieved from: https://www.scena9.ro/article/arta-tehnologie-si-postumanism.

Downloads

Published

2020-07-06

How to Cite

Bec, P. (2020). The Ethics of Vulnerability in the Posthuman Era. Journal for Social Media Inquiry, 2(1), 40-51. https://doi.org/10.18662/jsmi/2.1/4