The Cyberpunk Dystopia as a Reflection on Late Capitalism

Authors

  • Marius Florea MA Student, Master of Philosophy, Culture, Communication, Babeş-Bolyai University, Faculty of History and Philosophy, Department of Philosophy, Cluj-Napoca, 1 Mihail Kogălniceanu Street, 400084, Romania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/jsmi/2.1/6

Keywords:

dystopia, cyberpunk, transhumanism, posthumanism, consumerism, late capitalism

Abstract

The cyberpunk genre has long been caught in a dystopian view of the future as opposed to the rest of science-fiction which has presented us many utopian scenarios of a future where humanity is saved by technology. This countercultural aspect of it comes from a critique on corporate power, which is thought to use technology in an attempt to reshape the human subject into a more efficient worker and consumer. The growth of digital corporations, the practices of internet surveillance and the ever-increasing presence of technology in our daily lives surely add to the plausibility of this cyberpunk future. In a corporate society, everything from information to human relations will be functioning by the logic of capital, every aspect of human life becoming something to be shared and exchanged for someone to make a profit. Nothing that is not quantifiable and marketable will be of any use, thus making it hard for the human subject to value human experiences outside of this system. The danger that augmentations advocated by transhumanists pose is that in the capitalist system they become consumer goods, that will act in the same way as any other product does, increasing already existing inequalities by giving more advantages to the rich that will afford them. Moreover, human nature itself will be modified when these off-the-shelf augmentations that are supposed to liberate us will contribute to the uniformization of character, our intelligence, charisma or beauty being a serial product that will hold nothing original. The cyberpunk literary genre starting with William Gibson’s novel “Neuromancer” can give us some insight into how to live with this dystopian future that seems imminent.

References

Baudrillard, J. (2001) Paroxistul indifferent. Traducere de Ghiu, Bogdan. Cluj-Napoca: IDEA Design & Print.

Baudrillard, J. (2008) Simulacre şi simulare. Traducere de Big, Sebastian. Cluj-Napoca: IDEA Design & Print.

Baudrillard, J. (2008). Societatea de consum. Mituri şi structuri. București: Comunicare.ro.

Brande, D. (1994). The Business of Cyberpunk: Symbolic Economy and Ideology in William Gibson. Configurations 2(3), 509-536. Retrieved from : https://muse.jhu.edu/article/8060

Gibson, W. (1994). Neuromantul. Traducere de Mihai-Dan Pavelescu, Craiova: Cristian Plus.

Gibson, W. (2003). Burning chrome. New York: HarperCollins.

Grillmayr, J. (2020). Posthumanism(s). In McFarlane, A., Murphy, Graham J., Schmeink, L. (Eds.). The Routhledge Companion to Cyberpunk Culture. (pp. 273-281). New York: Routledge.

Haar, R., & McFarlane, A. (2020). Simulation and simulacra. In McFarlane, A., Murphy, Graham J., Schmeink, L. (Eds.). The Routhledge Companion to Cyberpunk Culture. (pp. 255-263). New York: Routledge.

Heise-von der Lippe, A. (2020). Gothicism. In McFarlane, A., Murphy, Graham J., Schmeink, L. (Eds.). The Routhledge Companion to Cyberpunk Culture. (pp. 264-272). New York: Routledge.

Newitz, A. (2019). Autonom. București: Nemira.

O’Connell, H. C. (2020). “Marxism”. In McFarlane, A., Murphy, Graham J., Schmeink, L. (Eds.). The Routhledge Companion to Cyberpunk Culture. (pp. 282-290). New York: Routledge.

Shelley, M. (2019). Frankenstein sau Prometeul modern. București: Art.

Downloads

Published

2020-07-06

How to Cite

Florea, M. (2020). The Cyberpunk Dystopia as a Reflection on Late Capitalism. Journal for Social Media Inquiry, 2(1), 63-74. https://doi.org/10.18662/jsmi/2.1/6