The Necessary Conditions for the Implementation of Articial Intelligence Ethics

Authors

  • Cristian Radu Student, Faculty of History and Philosophy, Department of Philosophy, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, 1 Mihail Kogălniceanu Street, 400084, Romania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/jsmi/2.1/9

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, morality, ethics, human, mind, body, communication

Abstract

The implementation of artificial intelligence morality is one of the most important themes discussed in the field of A.I. While many discussions focus on finding the right ethical system to implement, it is also important to address an important dilemma that comes with this possible innovation. Besides finding the right ethical system for A.I, we must also be aware of the conditions required to make possible the implementation of such a system. And these are not hardware requirements, but specific traits through which A.I. become more akin to humans. In this article, I will discuss what features do a.i. need to have in order to work with abstract ideas such as morality. To do this, I will first write a definition of human nature, based on past definitions written by various philosophers. And starting from this definition, I will highlight the most fundamental and essential human traits such as thinking and the nature of human rationality, communication, and the relationship between mind and body. After, I will compare these traits with a.i. to find out how close or far is the technology of achieving moral thinking. In order to accomplish these, I will use secondary sources of literature such as books and articles.

References

Aristotel. (1959). Politics. Londra: Harward University Press.

Aristotel. (2002). The Nicomachean Ethics. Minnesota: Focus Publishing.

Aristotel. (2006). Poetics. Minnesota: Focus Publishing.

Arkin, R. (2009). Ethical Robots in Warfare. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 28, 30-33.

Armstrong, S. (2014). Smarter than us: The Rise of Machine Intellgence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence. Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bostrom, N., & Yudkowsky, E. (2014). The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. In K. Frankish, & W. M. Ramsey (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence (pp. 316-335). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Clarke, D. (2007). Blaise Pascal. Retrieved from: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pascal/.

D’Aquino, T. (1997). Summa Theologiae Despre Dumnezeu. București: Editura Științifică.

D’Aquino, T. (2014). Summa Theologiae. London: Catholic Way Publishing.

Descartes, R. (2017). Meditations on the First Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dicker, G. (2013). Descartes: An Analytic and Historical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dreyfus, H. (1972). What Computers can’t do. New York: Harper & Row.

Flynn, T. (2004). Jean-Paul Sartre. Retrieved from: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/sartre/.

Friedman, M. (2004). Ernst Cassirer. Retrieved from: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/cassirer/.

Graves, M. (2017). Shared Moral and Spiritual Development Among Human Persons and Artificially Intelligent Agents. In Theology and Science, 3(15), 333-351.

Hirschfeld, L., & Gelman, S. (1994). Toward a topography of mind: An introduction to domain specificity. In L. Hirschfeld, & S. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 3-37). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hobbes, T. (1998). Leviathan, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Locke, J. (1996). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Indianopolis: Hackett Publishing Company.

Macionis J., & Gerber L. M. (2011). Sociology. Toronto: Pearson Prentice Hall.

McLaughlin, T. & Lentricchia, F. (1990). Critical Terms for Literary Study. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press

Oettinger, A. (1968). Language and Information. In American Documentation, 19(3), 295-298.

Pascal, B. (2013). Pensees. Londra: Penguin Books.

Piaget, J. (1966). Psychology of Intelligence. New York: Humanities Press.

Platon. (1976). Alcibiade. În F. Băltăceanu, M. Guțu, S. Vieru, S. Noica, D Slușanschi, A. Cizek, & Ș. Mironescu (Trad.), Opere, Vol. 1 (pp. 83-155). București: Științifică și Enciclopedică.

Platon. (1986). Republica. În A. Cornea (Trad.), Opere, Vol. 5 (pp. 81-445). București: Științifică și Enciclopedică.

Platon. (2013). Theaetetus. București: Humanitas.

Rousseau, J. J. (1968). The Social Contract. Indianopolis: Hackett Publishing Company.

Rousseau, J. J. (2012). Discourse on the origin and foundations of inequality among men. In D.A. Cress (Ed.), Rousseau: The Basic Political Writings 2nd Ed. (pp. 27-93). Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.

Russe, S., & Norvig, P. (2009). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Sartre, J. P. (1978). Being and Nothingness. New York: Pocket books.

Sf. Augustin. (2010). On the free choice of the Will. In P. King. (Ed.), Augustine: On the Free Choice of the Will, On Grace and Free Choice, and Other Writings (pp. 3-127). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Turing, A. (1950). Computing Machinery and Intelligence. Mind, 59(236), 433-460.

Vlastos, G. (1983). The Socratic Elenchus. În J. Annas (Ed.), Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, Vol. 1 (pp. 27-58). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wraight, C. (2008). Rousseau's The Social Contract: A Reader's Guide. Londra: Continuum Books.

Downloads

Published

2020-07-06

How to Cite

Radu, C. (2020). The Necessary Conditions for the Implementation of Articial Intelligence Ethics. Journal for Social Media Inquiry, 2(1), 100-114. https://doi.org/10.18662/jsmi/2.1/9