The Experience Created by the Social and Cultural Context Constructed by Video Games: A Digitization of Life and Death
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/jsmi/3.1/14Keywords:
video games, popular culture, expressive games, perma-death, mediated experienceAbstract
Appling the Gadamer’s filter on video games, reveals that they support an intimate connection with real life, built on basic mimesis of simple and, at the same time, coherent and meticulous realities. Video games are not intrinsically real-world escapism but generate a concrete, contextualized life experience that is ultimately connected to social and material realities (Spiridon, 2013, pp. 64-65). Moreover, experiences gained through video games can contribute, same as television, cinema or novels do, to the creation of perceptions that influence the way people relate to various aspects of life. The pivot of this study focuses on the experience created by the social, cultural context, captured by video games, which allow players to make choices of "life and death". Such choices are even more important in the current pandemic context when some people seem not to clearly understand the potential consequences on their own protection or even own survival. The aim of the research is to open a path for a better understanding of how a video game appreciated by critics and very popular among players, especially during the pandemic (DayZ, produced by Bohemia Interactive in 2013) explores social, cultural issues that can create a favorable context for players to be better equipped for the reality of everyday life. The study will include, besides the analysis of the video game itself, wikis, and walkthroughs, the views of other researchers and professionals working in the video game industry.
References
Avedon, E. M., & Sutton-Smith, B. (1971). The Study of Games. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Backe, H..J., & Aarseth, E. (2013). Proceedings of DiGRA 2013: DeFragging Game Studies Zombieism in Games. Proceedings of DiGRA 2013: DeFragging Game Studies, 7. http://www.digra.org/wp-content/uploads/digital-library/paper_405.pdf
Bartle, R. A. (1996). Hearts, Club, Diamonds, Spades: Players Who Suit MUDS. http://mud.co.uk
Bogost, I. (2008). The Rhetoric of Video Games. In K. Salen (Ed.). The Ecology of Games: Connecting Youth, Games, and Learning (pp. 117–140). MIT Press.
Caillois, R. (1961). Man, Play and Games. Free Press of Glencoe.
Carter, M. (2013). Ruthless Play. The Doctoral Consortium of the 8 Foundations of Digital Games Conference (14-17 May). Chania, Greece. http://www.fdg2013.org/program/doctoral/dc03_carter.pdf .
Căşvean, T. M. (2016). What is Game Studies Anyway? Legitimacy of Game Studies Beyond Ludo-centrism vs. Narrato-centrism Debate. In Revista Română de Jurnalism şi Comunicare, 11(1), 48-59.
D'Orazio, D. (2015, January 25). Gaming. The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/2015/1/25/7888125/dayz-total-game-sales-3-million
Egenfeldt-Nielsen, S., Smith, J. H., & Tosca, S. P. (2008). Understanding Video Games. The Essential Introduction (ed. 2). Routlege.
Gadamer, H.-G. (2000). Actualitatea frumosului (Kunst als Aussage). (V. Panaitescu, Trans.) Editura Polirom.
Gee, J. (2005). What would a state of the art instructional video game look like?. Journal of Online Education, 1(6), 1-6. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/innovate/vol1/iss6/1
Heaven, D. (2013, October 3). The rise of consequences in video games. NewScientist. https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn24325-buttonmasher-the-rise-of-consequences-in-video-games/?ignored=irrelevant#.UsVGBPQW3Rw
Huizinga, J. (2012). Homo ludens. Încercare de determinare a elementului ludic al culturii. (H. Radian, Trans). Humanitas.
Jenkins, H. (2006, July 2). Are Games Art? Wii I Mean Oui. CONFESSIONS OF AN ACA-FAN. http://henryjenkins.org/blog/2006/07/are_games_art_wii_i_mean_oui_1.html
Juul, J. (2005). Half-Real.Videogames between rules and fictional worlds. MIT Press.
Karhulahti, V.-M. (2015). Do Videogames Simulate? Virtuality and Imitation in Philosophy of Simulation. Simulation & Gaming, 46(6), 838-856. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878115616219
Lazzaro, N. (2004). Why We Play Games: Four Keys to More Emotion Without Story. In Proceedings of the Game Developer Conference (GDC), 2004. https://ubm-twvideo01.s3.amazonaws.com/o1/vault/gdc04/slides/why_we_play_games.pdf
Lu, L., Shen, C., & Williams, D. (2014). Friending your way up the ladder: Connecting massive multiplayer online game behaviors with offline leadership. In Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 54-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.013
Lundmark, S. (2014). Gaming Together: When an Imaginary World Affects Generalized Trust. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 12(1), 54-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2014.972602
Murray, J. H. (1997). Hamlet on the Holodeck: The future of narrative in cyberspace. MIT Press.
O’Brien, H., & Toms, E. (2008). What is user engagement? A conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology. In Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 59(6), 938-955. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20801
Pulsmeier, T. (2020, December 21). DayZ 2020. Bohemia Interactive https://www.bohemia.net/blog/dayz-2020-year-in-review
Robson, C. (1993). Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-Researchers. (ed. 2). Blackwell.
Ruch, A. (2012). Stockholm Syndrome: How Six Men Kidnapped me in DayZ. http://games.on.net/2012/07/stockholm-syndrome-how-six-men-kidnapped-me-in-dayz/
Ryan, M.-L. (2004). Introduction. In M.-L. Ryan (Ed.). Narrative across Media. The Languages of Storytelling (pp. 1-40). University of Nebraska Press.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. In American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037110003-066X.55.1.68
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A Review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. In Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 141-166. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141
Ryan, R. M., Rigby, C. S., & Przybylski, A. (2006). The Motivational Pull of Video Games: A self-determination theory approach. In Motivation and Emotion, 30(4), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-006-9051-8
Safian-Demers, E. (2021, May 6). Social Gaming. Wunderman Thompson.https://intelligence.wundermanthompson.com/2021/05/social-gaming/
Sherry, J. L., Lucas, K., Greenberg, B. S., & Lachlan, K. (2006). Video game uses and gratifications as predictors of use and game preference. In P.Vorderer & J. Bryant. J. (Eds.), Playing video games: Motives, responses, and consequences (pp. 213–224). Erlbaum.
Spiridon, M. (2012). Postmodernism Explained to Students. In Revista Română de Jurnalism şi Comunicare, 1, 69-76.
Spiridon, M. (2013). Popular culture. Modele, repere şi practici contemporane. Craiova: Scrisul Românesc.
Stuart, K. (2014, Ianuarie 10). Games Blog. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/gamesblog/2014/jan/10/would-dayz-benefit-from-a-touch-of-humanity-zombies
Tănase, C. (2014, October 05). External Communication Manager, Ubisoft România. (T.-M. Căşvean, Operator interviu)
Walker, J. (2006). How I Was Played by Online Caroline, Games. In N. Wardrip-Fruin, First Person. New Media as Story, Performance, and Game (pp. 302-309). MIT Press.
Yee, N. (2006). The Demographics, Motivations and Derived Experiences of Users of Massively-Multiuser Online Graphical Environments. In PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 15(3), 309-329. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.15.3.309
Yee, N. (2014). The Proteus Paradox. How Games and Virtual Worlds Change Us - and How They Don't.Yale University Press.
Zhong, Z. (2011). The effects of collective MMORPG (massively multiplayer online role-playing games) play on gamers’ online and offline social capital. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2352–2363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.07.014
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
The Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND
