Gender Equality Principle: Application in ECtHR’s Practice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/lumenlaw/9.1/59Keywords:
gender equality, ECtHR case law, discrimination, domestic violence, gender stereotypesAbstract
The article is devoted to analyzing the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), which concerned the issue of gender equality, distinctive features of the application of a gender equality principle by the ECtHR. Based on a study of ECtHR's rulings, it is noted that the concept of gender equality as one of the objectives of the Council of Europe has been applied by the ECtHR since the early 1990s. The ECtHR's approaches to dealing with gender equality cases are characterized both through the prism of non-discrimination (applying Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights in combination with other articles) and through complaints about violations of rights guaranteed by other ECHR articles. The analysis shows that, on the one hand, ECtHR emphasizes that gender equality is considered as one of the critical principles of the ECHR. However, on the other hand, significant difficulty in gender discrimination cases is the Court's possibility to refuse to analyze the case in the context of Article 14th content of the Convention. The possibility of giving the Court to states a vast margin of appreciation in determining domestic policies on gender equality is ambiguously manifested in judicial practice. The conclusion states that the need to ensure gender equality can be considered by the ECtHR as a legitimate aim and can serve as an appropriate basis for interfering with the exercise of certain rights and freedoms enshrined in the Convention.
References
Council of Europe. (2018). Stratégie du conseil de l'europe pour l'égalité entre les femmes et les hommes 2018-2023. Adoptée par le Comité des Ministres du Conseil de l'Europe [Council of Europe Strategy for Gender Equality 2018-2023. Adopted by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe]. https://www.coe.int/fr/web/genderequality/gender-equality-strategy
Equality and Human Rights Commission. (n.d.). Article 1 of the First Protocol: Protection of property. https://www.equalityhumanrights.com/en/human-rights-act/article-1-first-protocol-protection-property
European Convention on Human Rights. S.A.S. v. France. Application no. 43835/11. https://www.justiceinitiative.org/litigation/sas-v-france
European Court of Human Rights. (1950). European Convention on Human Rights. https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/convention_eng.pdf
European Court of Human Rights. (1993). Case of Schuler-Zgraggen v. Switzerland. Application no. 14518/89. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-57840%22]}
European Court of Human Rights. (1997). Case of Van Raalte v. The Netherlands. Application no. 20060/92.
http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/webservices/content/pdf/001-58031?TID=qunacxamrv
European Court of Human Rights. (2002). Case of Willis v. the United Kingdom. Application no. 36042/97. https://www.womenslinkworldwide.org/files/2991/gjo-echr-willis-en-pdf.pdf
European Court of Human Rights. (2006). Case of Zarb Adami v. Malta. https://rm.coe.int/6120252-v1-legal-summaries-gender-equality-help-eng/1680907208
European Court of Human Rights. (2009). Case of Opuz v. Turkey. Application no. 33401/02. Judgment. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/fra/pages/search.aspx?i=003-2759276-3020932
European Court of Human Rights. (2012). Konstantin Markin v. Russia. Application no. 30078/06. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/ukr#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-109868%22]}
European Court of Human Rights. (2016). Case of Irina Smirnova v. Ukraine. Application no.1870/ 05. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/pdf?library=ECHR&id=003-5517195-6939512&filename=Judgments%20and%20decisions%20of%2013.10.16.pdf
European Court of Human Rights. (2017). Case of Khamtokhu and Aksenchik v. Russia. Applications nos. 60367/08 and 961/11. https://www.conjur.com.br/dl/russia-prisao-perpetua-homens.pdf
European Court of Human Rights. (2020). Carvalho Pinto de Sousa Morais v. Opuz l. Application no. 17484/15. https://rm.coe.int/case-of-levchuk-v-ukraine-eng/16809fd60a
European Court of Human Rights. (2020). Case of Levchuk v. Ukraine. Application no. 17496/19. https://rm.coe.int/case-of-levchuk-v-ukraine-eng/16809fd60a
European Court of Human Rights. Case of Belyayev and others v. Ukraine. Application no. 34345/10. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/docx/?lib
European Court of Human Rights. (2005). Case of Leyla Şahin v. Turkey. Application no. 44774/98. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/tur#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-70956%22]}
European Court of Human Rights. (2009). Case of V.C. v. Slovakia. Application no. 18968/07. https://www.refworld.org/pdfid/4a648cb42.pdf
European Court of Human Rights. (2011). R.R. v. Poland. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre?i=001-104911
European Court of Human Rights. (2014). Case of Konovalova v. Russia. Application no. 37873/04 https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22002-10150%22]}
European Disability Forum. (n.d.). Instanbul Convention https://www.edf-feph.org/content/uploads/2020/12/istanbul_convention_easy-to-read_english.pdf
Karvatska, S., & Toronchuk, I. (2020). The Right to Non-Discrimination: Interpretive Practice of the Ecthr. European Journal of Law and Public Administration. 7(2), 24-38. https://doi.org/10.18662/eljpa/7.2/124
Law of Ukraine "On Ensuring Equal Rights and Opportunities for Women and Men" of September 8, 2005 № 2866- IV. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2866-15#Text [In Ukrainian]
The Penal Code of Ukraine. https://www.legislationline.org/documents/section/criminal-codes/country/52/Ukraine/show
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
LUMEN Law Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND
