Gender Equality Principle: Application in ECtHR’s Practice

Authors

  • Svitlana Karvatska LL. D (Doctor of Law), Associate Professor, Department of European Law and Comparative Law Studies, Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University, Ukraine
  • Ivan Toronchuk Ph. D, Associate professor, Department of European Law and Comparative Law Studies, Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University, Ukraine
  • Alyona Manyk Ph. D, Senior Lecturer, Department of European Law and Comparative Law Studies, Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/lumenlaw/9.1/59

Keywords:

gender equality, ECtHR case law, discrimination, domestic violence, gender stereotypes

Abstract

The article is devoted to analyzing the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), which concerned the issue of gender equality, distinctive features of the application of a gender equality principle by the ECtHR. Based on a study of ECtHR's rulings, it is noted that the concept of gender equality as one of the objectives of the Council of Europe has been applied by the ECtHR since the early 1990s. The ECtHR's approaches to dealing with gender equality cases are characterized both through the prism of non-discrimination (applying Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights in combination with other articles) and through complaints about violations of rights guaranteed by other ECHR articles. The analysis shows that, on the one hand, ECtHR emphasizes that gender equality is considered as one of the critical principles of the ECHR. However, on the other hand, significant difficulty in gender discrimination cases is the Court's possibility to refuse to analyze the case in the context of Article 14th content of the Convention. The possibility of giving the Court to states a vast margin of appreciation in determining domestic policies on gender equality is ambiguously manifested in judicial practice. The conclusion states that the need to ensure gender equality can be considered by the ECtHR as a legitimate aim and can serve as an appropriate basis for interfering with the exercise of certain rights and freedoms enshrined in the Convention.

References

Council of Europe. (2018). Stratégie du conseil de l'europe pour l'égalité entre les femmes et les hommes 2018-2023. Adoptée par le Comité des Ministres du Conseil de l'Europe [Council of Europe Strategy for Gender Equality 2018-2023. Adopted by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe]. https://www.coe.int/fr/web/genderequality/gender-equality-strategy

Equality and Human Rights Commission. (n.d.). Article 1 of the First Protocol: Protection of property. https://www.equalityhumanrights.com/en/human-rights-act/article-1-first-protocol-protection-property

European Convention on Human Rights. S.A.S. v. France. Application no. 43835/11. https://www.justiceinitiative.org/litigation/sas-v-france

European Court of Human Rights. (1950). European Convention on Human Rights. https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/convention_eng.pdf

European Court of Human Rights. (1993). Case of Schuler-Zgraggen v. Switzerland. Application no. 14518/89. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-57840%22]}

European Court of Human Rights. (1997). Case of Van Raalte v. The Netherlands. Application no. 20060/92.

http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/webservices/content/pdf/001-58031?TID=qunacxamrv

European Court of Human Rights. (2002). Case of Willis v. the United Kingdom. Application no. 36042/97. https://www.womenslinkworldwide.org/files/2991/gjo-echr-willis-en-pdf.pdf

European Court of Human Rights. (2006). Case of Zarb Adami v. Malta. https://rm.coe.int/6120252-v1-legal-summaries-gender-equality-help-eng/1680907208

European Court of Human Rights. (2009). Case of Opuz v. Turkey. Application no. 33401/02. Judgment. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/fra/pages/search.aspx?i=003-2759276-3020932

European Court of Human Rights. (2012). Konstantin Markin v. Russia. Application no. 30078/06. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/ukr#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-109868%22]}

European Court of Human Rights. (2016). Case of Irina Smirnova v. Ukraine. Application no.1870/ 05. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/pdf?library=ECHR&id=003-5517195-6939512&filename=Judgments%20and%20decisions%20of%2013.10.16.pdf

European Court of Human Rights. (2017). Case of Khamtokhu and Aksenchik v. Russia. Applications nos. 60367/08 and 961/11. https://www.conjur.com.br/dl/russia-prisao-perpetua-homens.pdf

European Court of Human Rights. (2020). Carvalho Pinto de Sousa Morais v. Opuz l. Application no. 17484/15. https://rm.coe.int/case-of-levchuk-v-ukraine-eng/16809fd60a

European Court of Human Rights. (2020). Case of Levchuk v. Ukraine. Application no. 17496/19. https://rm.coe.int/case-of-levchuk-v-ukraine-eng/16809fd60a

European Court of Human Rights. Case of Belyayev and others v. Ukraine. Application no. 34345/10. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/docx/?lib

European Court of Human Rights. (2005). Case of Leyla Şahin v. Turkey. Application no. 44774/98. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/tur#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-70956%22]}

European Court of Human Rights. (2009). Case of V.C. v. Slovakia. Application no. 18968/07. https://www.refworld.org/pdfid/4a648cb42.pdf

European Court of Human Rights. (2011). R.R. v. Poland. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre?i=001-104911

European Court of Human Rights. (2014). Case of Konovalova v. Russia. Application no. 37873/04 https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22002-10150%22]}

European Disability Forum. (n.d.). Instanbul Convention https://www.edf-feph.org/content/uploads/2020/12/istanbul_convention_easy-to-read_english.pdf

Karvatska, S., & Toronchuk, I. (2020). The Right to Non-Discrimination: Interpretive Practice of the Ecthr. European Journal of Law and Public Administration. 7(2), 24-38. https://doi.org/10.18662/eljpa/7.2/124

Law of Ukraine "On Ensuring Equal Rights and Opportunities for Women and Men" of September 8, 2005 № 2866- IV. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2866-15#Text [In Ukrainian]

The Penal Code of Ukraine. https://www.legislationline.org/documents/section/criminal-codes/country/52/Ukraine/show

Downloads

Published

2021-12-12

How to Cite

Karvatska, S., Toronchuk, I., & Manyk, A. (2021). Gender Equality Principle: Application in ECtHR’s Practice. Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty: Law, 9(1), 83-95. https://doi.org/10.18662/lumenlaw/9.1/59

Publish your work at the Scientific Publishing House LUMEN

It easy with us: publish now your work, novel, research, proceeding at Lumen Scientific Publishing House

Send your manuscript right now