SARS-COV2 as Trigger for Reviewing Strategic and Operational Public Administration Frameworks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/lumenpses/6.1/13Keywords:
Public administration, Bank policies, operational and strategic level, policymaking, policies, pandemic, SARS-COV2Abstract
Administration as complex field of science, expertise, and research has accompanied economic, social, and cultural development from ancient times up to now. Public administration is the most visible component as it has multiple facets as expression of the political, legal, and managerial context inside a country. It ensures permanent direct or indirect links between government and individuals, and is relevant for several related fields like employment, education, health, and environment. The current ongoing pandemic has confronted public administrations all over the world with multiple challenges, and one of them stands out – the necessity of reviewing policymaking processes, policies, measures, and intervention frameworks of public administration to make them more flexible, responsive and fit for operating in a digitalized environment. In this respect, Romania is faced with multiple challenges regarding policymaking and public administration policies, and as regards decision-making and proper functioning at the two main levels, respectively operational and strategic.
Current uncertainty needs to be addressed not just by immediate action, but also requires outlining some future directions for policymaking as regards public policies at strategic level, and improvement of skills and capacities at operational level at both national and European level. It should address main fields public administration has to deal with, from education and health, to employment and environmental issues as global crises like the SARS-COV2 pandemic or other unexpected force majeure events might change priorities and endanger certain aspects of established policies thus being both threat and opportunity for convergence and cohesion at European and national level.
References
Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion of the European Commission. (2017). A comparative overview of public administration characteristics and performance in the EU28. https://op.europa.eu/en/
publication-detail/-/publication/3e89d981-48fc-11e8-be1d-01aa75ed71a1/language-en
Hodgson, G. M. (2006). What are institutions. Journal of Economic Issues, 40(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2006.11506879
Nelson, R. R. (1994). Why do firms differ, and how does it mattet. In R. P. Rumelt, D. E. Schendel & D. J. Teece (Eds.), Fundamental issues in strategy. Harvard Business School Press
North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performances. Cambridge University Press
Omran, A. R. (1971). The epidemiologic transition: A theory of the epidemiology of population change. Milbank Quarterly, 83(4), 731-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00398.x
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons. The evolution of institutions for collective actions, political economy of institutions and decisions. Cambridge University Press.
Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2017). Public management reform. A comparative analysis into the age of austerity (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Raadschelders, J. C. N., Vigoda-Gadot, E., & Kisner, M. (2015). Global dimensions of public administration and governance: A comparative voyage. Jossey-Bass.
Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Garcilazo, E. (2015). Quality of government and the returns of investment: Examining the impact of cohesion expenditure in European regions. Regional Studies, 49(8), 1274-1290. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2015.1007933
Schotter, A. (2000). The economic theory of social institutions. Southern Economic Journal, 48. https://doi.org/10.2307/1058295
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
LUMEN PSES Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND