Innovative Solutions for Online Recruitment – Gamified Assessment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/po/59Keywords:
game based assessment, recruitment, spatial reasoning, verbal reasoningAbstract
Game-based ratings have received a lot of media attention and managed to capture the interests of many organizations (eg Unilever, AXA Group, Deloitte etc.). In a recent study of human resources practitioners, 75% of participants indicated that they would consider using gamification as part of their own recruitment and selection strategy in the near future. Following the methodological approach already used in educational environment, two approaches to building and using GBA in the organizational environment can be distinguished: gamified assessment – by gamifying (already existing) psychometric test; psychometric play - use of a game to gather evaluation data. It is well accepted that, the basis of the success of any company is due to the human capital, which is the combination of people’s capabilities and skills. Therefore, the fundamental job of any recruiter is sourcing talent and engaging employees in the organization. For this, they have to ensure that the candidate’s skills match well with the organization’s requirement and culture. Previous studies highlighted that those applying for a job are eager to use game-based assessment for self-evaluation, especially when these games are available for free. Game-based assessments can also help maintain a high commitment during the evaluation, which reduces the likelihood of some candidates dropping out in the process and also increases the amount of time that data can be collected. Current paper aim at presenting the preliminary efforts made to gamify two psychometric tests, namely spatial and verbal reasoning.References
Al-Azawi, R., Al-Faliti, F., & Al-Blushi, M. (2016). Educational gamification vs. game based learning: Comparative study. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 7(4), 132–136. doi:10.18178/ijimt.2016.7.4.659
Behling, O. (1998). Employee selection: Will intelligence and conscientiousness do the job?. Academy of Management Executive, 12(1), 77-86. doi:10.5465/AME.1998.254980
Bohlander, G., & Snell, S. (2004). Managing human resources (13th ed.). Mason, USA: Thomson/South-Western.
Bontilă, G.C. (1971). Culegere de teste psihologice de nivel si aptitudini. Anexa la lucrarea “Aptitudinile si masurarea lor” [Collection of psychological tests of level and skills. The appendix to "Skills and their measurement"]. Bucharest, Romania: Centrul de documentare și publicații al Ministerului Muncii.
Buckley, M. R., & Russell, C. C. (1997). Mete-analytic estimates of interview criterion-related validity: A qualitative assessment. In R. W. Eder & M. M. Harris (Eds.), The employment interview: Theory, research, and practice. Beverly Hills, USA: Sage.
Cable, D. M., & Judge, T. A. (1996). Person-organization fit, job choice decisions, and organizational entry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(3), 294-311. doi:10.1006/obhd.1996.0081
Caldwell, D. F., & O’Reilly III, C. A. (1990). Measuring person-job fit with a profile-comparison process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(6), 648-657. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.75.6.648
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, USA: Harper & Row.
Dawis, R. V., & Lofquist, L. H. (1984). A psychological theory of work adjustment. Minneapolis, USA: University of Minnesota Press.
De Klerk, S., Eggen, T. J. H. M., & Veldkamp, B. P. (2014). A blending of computer-based assessment and performance-based assessment: Multimedia-Based Performance Assessment (MBPA). The introduction of a new method of assessment in Dutch Vocational Education and Training (VET). Cadmo, 22(1), 39-56. doi:10.3280/CAD2014-001006
Edwards, J. R. (1991). Person-job fit: A conceptual integration, literature review, and methodological critique. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology, (pp. 283-357). Oxford, England: John Wiley & Sons.
Edwards, J. R. (1996). An examination of competing versions of the personenvironment fit approach to stress. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), 292-339. doi:10.2307/256782
Feser, E. J. (2003). What regions do rather than make: A proposed set of knowledge-based occupation clusters. Urban Studies, 40(10), 1937– 1958. doi:10.1080/0042098032000116059
Fleishman, E. A., & Reilly, M. E. (1992). Handbook of human abilities: Definitions, measurements, and job task requirements. Palo Alto, USA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
French, J. R. P. Jr., Caplan, R. D., & Harrison, R. V. (1982). The mechanisms of job stress and strain. London, UK: Wiley.
Gravetter, F. J., & Forzano, L. B. (2012). Research methods for the behavioral sciences (4th ed.). Belmont, USA: Wadsworth.
Hall, D. T., Schneider, B., & Nygren, H. T. (1970). Personal factors in organizational identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15, 176-190. doi:10.2307/2391488
Handel, M. J. (2016). The O-NET content model: strengths and limitations. Journal for Labour Market Research. 49(2), 157-176. doi:10.1007/s12651-016-0199-8
Hirsch, B. T. (2005). Why do part-time workers earn less? The role of worker and job skills. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 58(4), 525–551. doi:10.1177/001979390505800401
Holden, R. B. (2010). Face validity. In I. B. Weiner, W. E. Craighead, The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology (4th ed.) (pp. 637–638). Hoboken, USA: Wiley.
Holland, J. L. (1973). Making vocational choices: A theory of careers. Englewood Cliffs, USA: Prentice-Hall.
Iseli, M. R., Koenig, A. D., Lee, J. J., & Wainess, R. (2010). Automated assessment of complex task performance in games and simulations (CRESST research report no. 775). Los Angeles, USA: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, Student Testing. Available from: www.cse.ucla.edu/products/reports/R775.pdf
Kadir, A., Osman, U., Özlem, O., Emrah, Ö., & Tugba, Ö. (2016). Comparing person organization fit and person job fit. Journal of Economics and Management, 25(3), 5-13. doi:10.22367/jem.2016.25.01
Kato, P. M. & de Klerk, S. (2017). Serious Games for Assessment: Welcome to the Jungle. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 18(S1), 1-6.
Kozhevnikov, M., Motes, M. A., & Hegarty, M. (2007). Spatial visualization in physics problem solving. Cognitive Science, 31(4), 549–579. doi:10.1080/15326900701399897
Kristof, A. (1996). Person-organization fit: an integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49(1), 1-49. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01790.x
Hoffman, B. J., & Woehr, D. J. (2006). A quantitative review of the relationship between person - Organization fit and behavior outcomes. Journal of Vocation Behavior, 68(3), 389-399. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2005.08.003
Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D. & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, personorganization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 281-342. doi:10.1111/j.17446570.2005.00672.x
Laumer, S., Eckhard, A., & Weitzel, T. (2012). Online gaming to find a new job – examining job seekers’ intention to use serious games as a self-assessment tool. German Journal of Research in Human Resource Management, 26(3), 218-240. doi:10.1177/239700221202600302
Lauver, K. J., & Kristof-Brown, A. L. (2001). Distinguishing between employees’ perceptions of person-job and person-organization fit. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59(3), 454-470. doi:10.1006/jvbe.2001.1807
Lee, Y., Reiche B. S., & Song, D. (2010). How do newcomers fit in? The dynamics between person-environment fit and social capital across cultures. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 10(2), 153-174. doi:10.1177/1470595810370911
Levy, R. (2013). Psychometric and evidentiary advances, opportunities, and challenges for simulation-based assessment. Educational Assessment, 18(3), 182–207. doi:10.1080/10627197.2013.814517
Lohman, D. F. (1988). Spatial abilities as traits, processes, and knowledge. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the Psychology of Human Intelligence (pp. 181–232). Hillsdale, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
McDaniel, W. A., Whetzel, D. L., Schmidt, F. L., & Maurer, S. D. (1994). The validity of employment interviews: A comprehensive review and metaanalysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 599-616. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.79.4.599
Meyer, J., & Allen, N. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and application. Thousand Oaks, USA: Sage Publications.
Mislevy, R. J., Oranje, A., Bauer, M., Von Davier, A. A., Hao, J., Corrigan, S., Hoffman, E., DiCerbo, K., & John, M. (2014). Psychometric considerations in game-based assessment. New York, USA: Institute of Play.
Montefiori. L. (2016). Game-based assessment: Face validity, fairness perception, and impact on employer’s brand image. Assessment and Development Matters, 8(2), 19-22.
National Research Council. (2006). Learning to think spatially: GIS as a support system in the K–12 curriculum. Washington, DC, USA: National Academic Press.
Newcombe, N. S. (2013). Seeing relationships: Using spatial thinking to teach science, mathematics, and social studies. American Educator, 37(1), 26–31.
O’Reilly, C. A., Chatman, J. & Caldwell, D. F. (1991). People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 487-516. doi:10.2307/256404
Pierce, E. (2018). Why spatial reasoning is important in the workplace. Retrieved from https://blog.criteriacorp.com/why-spatial-reasoning-is-important-inthe-workplace
Peltokangas, H. (2014). The use of personality measures in personnel selection: the person-job fit and its relationship to leaders’ performance and burnout. American International Journal of Social Science, 3(4), 185-193.
Rahmadani, V. G., & Sebayang, I. R. (2017). The influence of person-organization fit and person-job fit on work engagement among policemen in sumatera utara. International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration, 4(1), 45-51. doi:10.18775/ijmsba.1849-5664-5419.2014.41.1006
Ree, M. J., & Earles, J. A. (1992). Intelligence is the best predictor of job performance. Psychological Science, 1(3), 86-89. doi:10.1111/1467- 8721.ep10768746
Robbins, S. P. (2006). Organizational behavior (9th ed.). San Diego, USA: Prentice Hall International, Inc.
Rynes, S. L., & Gerhart, B. (1990). Interviewer assessments of applicant “fit”: An exploratory investigation. Personnel Psychology, 43(1), 13-35. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1990.tb02004.x
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 262-274. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.262
Scroggins, W. A. (2008). Antecedents and outcomes of experienced meaningful work: A person-job fit perspective. Journal of Business Inquiry, 7(1), 68-78. doi:10.4102/sajip.v43i0.1398
Sekiguchi, T. (2004). Person-organization fit and person-job fit in employee selection: A review of the literature. Osaka Keidai Ronshu, 54(6), 179-196.
Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117(2), 250-270. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.117.2.250
Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2009). Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 817–835. doi:10.1037/a0016127
Werbel, J. D., & Gilliland, S. W. (1999). Person-environment fit in the selection process. In G. R. Ferris (Ed.), Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, (pp. 209-243). Stamford, USA: JAI Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Postmodern Openings Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND