Domestic Violence in the Postmodern Society: Ethical and Forensic Aspects
Keywords:
domestic violence, postmodern society, victim, ethics, forensic medicineAbstract
The acts of violence, in all their forms, constitute a serious violation of human rights. Domestic violence is a particular phenomenon, considering the fact that its consequences affect the whole family, and its implications also have an important social component. Although in its original form it regards both man and woman in the role of victim, the much higher ratio in favor of women makes the name refer mainly to the aggression on the woman. This phenomenon is present throughout the world, in all social classes, both among the native population and among the emigrants. This paper highlights the postmodern approach to domestic violence. The authors discuss the general context of such acts of violence, the difficulties faced by victims in finding support, the difficulties faced by authorities in providing support, and the particular situation of the forensic doctor when examining the victims of this type of violence, through the ethical and professional framework.References
Brown A.W. (2001). Obstacles to women accessing forensic medical exams in cases of sexual violence. Unpublished background paper to the Consultation on the Health Sector Response to Sexual Violence, WHO Headquarters, Departments of Injuries and Violence Prevention and Gender and Women's Health, Geneva. Available at: www.hrw.org/backgrounder/wrd/who-bck.pdf
Campbell J. (2004). Helping women understand their risk in situations of intimate partner violence. J Interpers Violence., 19(12), 1464-1477.
Carta drepturilor fundamentale a Uniunii Europene (2007/C 303/01) available at http://www.dri.gov.ro/carta-drepturilor-fundamentale-a-uniunii-europene/
Cook, R.J., & Dickens, B.M. (2009). Dilemmas in intimate partner violence. Int J Gynaecol Obstet., 106, 72-75.
Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence, 2011 available at https://rm.coe.int/168008482e
Directive 2012/29/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2001/220/HA, available at https://ec.europa.eu/anti-trafficking/legislation-and-case-law-eu-legislation-criminal-law/directive-201229eu_en
Erez, E. (2002). Domestic violence and the criminal justice system: an overview. Online J Issues Nurs., 7(1), 4-20.
Erez, E., & Hartley, C.C. (2003). Battered immigrant women and the legal system: a therapeutic jurisprudence perspective. West Crim Rev., 4(2), 155-169.
Erez, E., Nawal, A., Orloff, L.E., Pendelton, G., & Marin, L. (2003). Violence against immigrant women and systematic responses: an exploratory study. A report submitted to the National Institute of Justice, Washington DC.
European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (2014). Violenta impotriva femeilor: o ancheta la nivelul UE, available at https://publications.europa.eu/ro/publication-detail/-/publication/97fbb0d9-8c7a-4983-bafa-e439543d8a18/
Fee, E., Brown, T.M., Lazarus, J., & Theerman, P. (2002). Domestic violence-medieval and modern. Am. J. Public Health., 92(12), 1908.
FIGO Committee for the Study of Ethical Aspects of Human Reproduction and Women's Health. (2015). Ethical issues in obstetrics and gynecology. London: FIGO Available at: https://www.figo.org/sites/default/files/uploads/wg-publications/ethics/FIGO% 20 Ethical%20Issues%202015.pdf4893.pdf
Fischer, K., & Rose, M. (1995). When enough is not enough: battered women's decision making around court orders or protection. Crime Delinq., 41(4), 414-429.
Garcia-Moreno, C., Jansen, H.A.F.M., Ellsberg, M., Heise, L., & Watts, C. (eds) (2005). WHO Multi-Country Study on Women's Health and Domestic Violence against Women: Initial Results on Prevalence, Health Outcomes and Women's Responses. Geneva: World Health Organisation.
Hamberger, L.K. (1997). Female offenders in domestic violence: a look at actions in their context. J Agress Maltreat Trauma, 1(1), 117-129.
Harway, M., Geffner, R., Ivey, D., Koss, M.P., Cody Murphy, B., Mio, J.S., & O'Neil, J.M. (2011). Intimate partner abuse and relationship violence. Available online at: https://www.apa.org/about/division/activities/partner-abuse.pdf
Johnson, M.P. (1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: two forms of violence against women. J Marriage Fam., 57, 283-294.
Mahoney, M.R. (1991). Legal images of battered women: redefining the issue of separation. Mich Law Rev., 90, 1-94.
Martin, D. (1976). Battered wives. San Francisco: Glide Publications.
Menjivar, C., & Salcido, O. (2002). Immigrant women and domestic violence: common experiences in different countries. Gend Soc., 16(6), 898-920.
Mladovsky, P. (2007). Migrant health in the EU. Eurohealth, 13(1), 9-11.
Pleck, E. (1987). Domestic tyranny: the making of American social policy against family violence from colonial times to the present. New York: Oxford University Press.
Raj, A., & Silverman, J. (2002). Violence against immigrant women: the roles of culture, context and legal immigrant status on intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 8, 367-398.
Rakovec-Felser, Z. (2014). Domestic violence and abuse in intimate relationship from public health perspective. Health Psychol Res, 2(3), 1821.
Rothman, E.F., Mandel, D.G., & Silverman, J.G. (2007). Abusers' perceptions of the effect of their intimate partner violence on children. Violence Against Women, 13(11), 1179-1191.
United Nations Development Programme. (2009). Human Development Report: Overcoming barriers: Human mobility and development. New York: UNDP.
Wang, T., Liu, Y., Li, Z., Liu, K., Xu, Y., Shi, W., & Chen L. (2017). Prevalence of intimate partner violence (IPV) during pregnancy in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One, 12(10), e0175108. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175108.
Worden, P.A. (2000). The changing boundaries of the criminal justice system: redefining the problem and the response in domestic violence. In C. M. Friel, Criminal Justice (vol. 2) Boundary Changes in Criminal Justice Organizations (pp. 215-266). Washington DC: National Institute of Justice.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Postmodern Openings Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND