Postmodernism and the Perspectives of University Education

Authors

  • Leonid Vakhovskyi Luhansk Taras Shevchenko National University
  • Oleksandr Babichev Luhansk Taras Shevchenko National University
  • Tetiana Ivchenko Luhansk Taras Shevchenko National University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/po/13.3/498

Keywords:

postmodernism, university education, mass character, commercialization, teaching strategy, student educational strategy, risk university

Abstract

The article reveals the use of postmodernism as a style of thinking and a special view of contemporaneity as an interpretive basis for understanding present-day university education and understanding the prospects for its development in new conditions. The emphasis is based on three characteristics of the postmodern paradigm: change in the status of knowledge in society; non-structural, non-linear way of organizing integrity, excluding rigid centralization, orderliness and symmetry; a special model of contemporaneity, which does not allow the imposition of life guidelines and values on a person.

It is shown that the situation of postmodernism has led to new phenomena in university education, which have changed the traditional status and mission of the university. There was a tendency towards the mass character of university education, which, by expanding accessibility, contributed to a decrease in its quality. The change in the status of knowledge in society has led to the commercialization of education, which puts on threat the academic freedom and autonomy of the university, which becomes dependent on the “order” for educational services. Teaching strategies and educational strategies of students are changing; the level of their interconnection and interdependence is decreasing.

It is noted that the modernization of higher education determines the formation of a new university – the university at risk and actualizes the task of predicting systematically emerging risks and dangers and developing measures to level or limit their negative impacts.

References

Barnett, R. (2000). University Knowledge in an Age of Supercomplexity. Higher Education, 40(4), 409-422. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004159513741

Beck, U. (2010). World at Risk. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Bloland, H. G. (1995). Postmodernism and Higher Education. The Journal of Higher Education, 66(5), 521-559. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1995.11774797

Boyne, R., & Rattansi, A. (1990). Postmodernism and Society. Macmillan.

Browne, C. (2010). Postmodernism, Ideology and Rationality. Revue internationale de philosophie, 251, 79-99. https://doi.org/10.3917/rip.251.0079

Clark, B. (1998). Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organization Pathways of Transformation. Pergamon.

Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1988). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Athlone Press.

Duignan, B. (2020). Postmodernism. https://www.britannica.com/topic/postmodernism-philosophy.

Greenfield, P. (2000). What Psychology can do for anthropology, or why anthropology took postmodernism on the chin. American Anthropologist, 102(3), 564-576. http://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2000.102.3.564

Karie, G. (1996). Cultural models of university. Alma Mater, No. 3, 14-18.

Lagunova, I. S. (2017). What is the contemporaneity for a contemporary man? Philosophical thought, No. 4, 70-83.

Lyotard, J.F. (1979). La condition postmoderne: rapport sur le savoir [The Postmodern Condition: Knowledge Report]. Minuit.

McKinley, B. (2000). Postmodernism certainly is not science, but could it be religion? CSAS Bulletin, 36(1), 16-18.

Readings, B. (1996). The University in Ruins. Harvard University Press.

Robbins, L. (1966). The university in the modern world. Macmillan.

Rodin, I. V. (2015). Universities and crisis of the system of higher education in France (the 60s – the beginning of the 70s of the 21st century). PhD thesis. Moscow. https://www.hist.msu.ru/Science/Disser/Rodin.pdf

Salberg, D., Stewart. R., Wesley, K., & Weiss, Sh. (2009). Postmodernism and Its Critics. Anthropological theories. https://anthropology.ua.edu/theory/postmodernism-and-its-critics/

Scott, P. (2012). Postmodernity and the university. Revista Española de Educación Comparada, 81. https://doi.org/10.5944/reec.20.2012.7594

Strogetskaya, Ye. V. (2010). The idea and mission of modern university. Questions of education, 4, 67-81. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ideya-i-missiya-sovremennogo-universiteta

System of higher education of western countries: Reference book. (1991). Publishing House of Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia.

Theoretical question of education. (2013). BGU. https://elib.bsu.by/handle/123456789/104669

Vakhovskyi, L. (2010). Modernism as a methodological project of Soviet pedagogy. Historical and Pedagogical Almanac, 1, 61-65. https://library.udpu.org.ua/library_files/istoruk_ped_almanax/2010/2010_1_11.pdf

Vakhovskyi, L., Ivchenko, A., Ivchenko, T. (2021). Presentism as a research strategy in modern history of education. Istoriya-History, 29(5), 498-509. https://doi.org/10.53656/his2021-5-5-pres

Webster, F. (2001). The Postmodern University? The Loss of Purpose in British Universities. Access Denied in the Information Age. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333985465_5

Wheatley, L. B. (2021). The Impact of Postmodernism on 21st Century Higher Education. Liberal Studies (MA), Final Essays, Hollins University, 50. https://digitalcommons.hollins.edu/malsfe/50

World Declaration on Higher Education for the Twenty-First Century: Vision and Action. (1998). https://bice.org/app/uploads/2014/10/unesco_world_declaration_on_higher_education_for_the_twenty_first_century_vision_and_action.pdf

Downloads

Published

2022-08-08

How to Cite

Vakhovskyi, L., Babichev, O., & Ivchenko, T. (2022). Postmodernism and the Perspectives of University Education. Postmodern Openings, 13(3), 425-438. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/13.3/498

Issue

Section

Theoretical articles