Minimum Level of Education. An Analysis of the Results of Romanian Students Based on Pisa Data

Authors

  • Gabriela Neagu PhD, Senior researcher II, Research Institute for Quality of Life, Romanian Academy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/upasw/15

Keywords:

PISA, minimum level of education, skills, equity and efficiency in education.

Abstract

The results obtained by Romanian students at international assessments (PISA, TIMSS, PIRLS) are very low compared to the other European countries. Moreover, a very large percentage of them is below the minimum level of competency for all three areas investigated by PISA: writing/reading, mathematics and science. On the occasion of these assessments, the education systems are put in a position to measure the ability to form and transmit to the students the knowledge, skills, abilities needed for full social and professional integration, in a constantly changing society and economy.
In this article, we aim to focus on that category of students who fail to overcome level 2 skills, knowledge, skills on the PISA scale. The data come from PISA 2015, but also from previous assessments (PISA 2012, 2009, 2006) and the research method we will use is secondary data analysis.

References

Apostu, O., Balica, M., Florian, B., Horga, I., Jigău, M., & Voinea, L. (2012). Copiii care nu merg la școală, O analiză a participării la educaţie în învăţământul primar şi gimnazial. Institutul de Științe ale Educației. Bucureşti: Editura Universitară.

Bautier, E., Crinon, J., Rayou, P., Roche, J.-Y. (2004). Performances en littéracie, modes de faireet univers mobilisés par les élèves: analyses secondaires de l‟enquête PISA (2000) în Revue française de pédagogie. Retrieved from: http://rfp.revues.org/441

Bottani, N. & Vrignaud, P. (2005). La France et les évaluations internationales. Rapport pour le Haut conseil d‟évaluation de l‟École. Paris:Ministère de l‟Éducation nationale [online]. Retrieved from: http://www.ladocumentationfrancaise.fr/var/storage/rapportspublics/054000359.pdf

Crahay, M. (2003). Peut-on lutter contre l’échec scolaire? Bruxelles: De Boeck.

Demeuse, M. & Friant, N. (2012). Evaluer les politiques d‟éducation prioritaire en Europe: un défi méthodologique, In Revue des sciences de l’education. 2012; 34(1): 39-55 [online]. Retrieved from: https://hal.archivesouvertes.fr/hal-00722916/document

Duru-Bellat, M. (2003). Les apprentissages des eleves dans leurs context: les effets de la composition de l'environement scolaire. In Carrefours de l'education, Nr. 16: 182-206 [online]. Retrieved from: www. DOI: 10.3917/cdle016;

Duru-Bellat, M., Danner, M., Le Bastard-Landrier, S., Piquee, C. (2004). Les effets de la composition scolaire et sociale du public d‟éleves sur leur réusite et leurs attitudes: Evaluation extern et explorations qualitatives. Rapport pour le Commisariat General du Plan et la DEP (Ministere de l‟éducation nationale) [online]. www.u-bourgogne.fr/IREDU

Duru-Bellat, M., Mons, N., Suchaut, B., (2004). Caractéristiques des systèmes éducatifs et compétences des jeunes à 15 ans, în Les Cahiers de l’Iredu, 66: 1-158.

Draelants, H. (2002). L'impact des structures et de l'organisation d'un système scolaire sur la production d'inégalités en son sein, în Esprit critique; 4(5). [online].http://www.espritcritique.org.

Ghesquière, F. (2013). Les différentes conceptions de l‟égalité scolaire à l‟épreuve de l‟enquête PISA 2006, în Revue française de pédagogie [En ligne], 185 | 2013, mis en ligne le 31 décembre 2016. Retrieved from: http://rfp.revues.org/4300. DOI: 10.4000/rfp.4300

Gorard, S. & Smith E. (2004). An international comparison of equity in education systems, în Comparative Education, 40: 15-28.

Kitchen, H., E., Fordham, K. Hendesom, A. Looney, S.Maghnouj. (2017) . OECD Reviews of Evaluation and Assessment in Education Romania 2017.Retrieved from: https://www.unicef.org/romania/OECD_Reviews_en_pt_web.pdf

Letor, C. & Vandenberghe, V. (2003). L‟acces aux competences est-il plus (in) equitable que l`acces aux savoirs traditionnels? În Cahier de Recherche du GIRSEF - n° 25 – Novembre 2003 Retrieved from: https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00603508/document

Marinescu, C. (2010). Educaţia, perspectivă economică. Bucureşti: Editura Economică;

Meuret, D. (2002). Tentative de comparaison de l'équite des systemés éducatifs franςais et americain [online]. Retrieved from www.cairn.info/load_pdf.php?ID_ARTICLE=CDLE_013_0126

Mons, N. (2007). Les nouvelles politiques éducatives. La France fait-elle les bons choix ? Paris, France: Presses universitaires de France.

Neagu, G. (2012). Șanse de acces la educație în societatea românească actuală. Iaşi: Editura Lumen.

Normand, R. (2006). L‟école efficace ou l‟horizon du monde comme laboratoire, în Revue française de pédagogie [online] http://rfp.revues.org/114. DOI: 10.4000/rfp.114 .

Petrescu, C. & Neguț, A. (2016). Modele de organizare și funcționare a învățământului profesional și tehnic din România, în Revista Calitatea Vieții. Nr. 4: 304-323.

Smith, E. (2006). Using Secondary Data in Educational and Social Research. Open University Press.

Sen, A. (1980). Equality of what? In Tannet Lectures on Human Values, Edited by S. McMurrin. Salt Lake City.

Sen, A. (1992). Inequality Re-examined. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Shewbridge, C. & Jang, E., Matthews, P., Santiago, P. (2011). OCDE Reviews of Evaluatin and Assessment in Education DENMARK [online]. Retrieved from: https://www.oecd.org/denmark/47696663.pdf

Thrupp, M. (1999). Schools making a difference: Let”s be realistic. Schools mix, school effectiveness and social limits of reform. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Verhoeven, M., Dupriez, V., Orianne, J.-F. (2009) Politiques éducatives at approche par les capacités » In Éthique publique [En ligne], 11(1).https://journals.openedition.org/ethiquepublique/1320

Zachary, M. Durpiez, V., Vandenberghe, V. (2002). Comparaison internationale de l‟efficacité et de l‟équité des systèmes d‟enseignement. în De de la Croix, F. Docquier, C. Mainguet, S. Perelman & E. Wasner (Eds.) Capital humain et dualisme sur le marché du travail. Bruxelles: De Boeck: 259-279.

Wöessman, L. (2000). Schooling Resources, Educational Institutions, and Student Performance: The International Evidence ». In Kiel Working Paper, n° 983.Germany.

***. PISA 2012 results: The ABC of Gender Equality in Education: Aptitude, Behaviour, Confidence [online]. Retrieved from: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results.htm.

***. Résultats du PISA 2012: Savoirs et savoir-faire des élèves: PERFORMANCE DES ÉLÈVES EN MAT HÉMAT IQUES,EN COMPRÉHENSION DE L‟ÉCRIT ET EN SCIENCES, Volume I,[online] Retrieved from: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012- results.htm.

***. Résultats du PISA 2015: Excellence and Equite en Education (Volume I), [online]. Retrieved from: http://www.oecd.org/education/pisa-2015- results-volume-i-9789264266490-en.htm

***. Les implications des résultats de l‟enquête PISA 2015 pour l‟action publique, Résultats du PISA 2015 (Volume I):L‟excellence et l‟équité dans l‟éducation,[online] https://www.oecdilibrary.org/docserver/9789264267534-12- fr.pdf?expires=1546011504&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=81F3D3B 8188F1ABB9700F60D2073D4E6.

***. Résultats du PISA 2015: (Volume II), Policies and Practices for Successful Schools [online]. Retrieved from: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-2015-results-volume-ii-9789264267510- en.htm.

***. Raport Eurydice. (2012). Dezvoltarea competenţelor cheie în şcolile din Europa:Provocări şi Oportunităţi pentru Politică (ECEEA)[online]. Retrieved from: www.eurydice.org.

***. Eurostat, 2012, [online]. Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database.

***. MINISTERUL EDUCAȚIEI NAȚIONALE Raport privind starea învățământului preuniversitar din România, 2016 [online]. Retrieved from: https://www.edu.ro/sites/default/files/_fi%C8%99iere/Minister/2017/tra nsparenta/Stare%20preuniv%202016.pdf.

Downloads

Published

2019-07-16

How to Cite

Neagu, G. (2019). Minimum Level of Education. An Analysis of the Results of Romanian Students Based on Pisa Data. Anuarul Universitatii Petre Andrei Din Iasi - Fascicula: Asistenta Sociala, Sociologie, Psihologie, 21, 58-87. https://doi.org/10.18662/upasw/15