Religious-Secular Reality of Individual Consciousness In The Context of COVID-19


  • Leonid Mozghovyi SHEI "Donbas State Pedagogical University"
  • Volodymyr Muliar Zhytomyr Polytechnic State University
  • Olena Stepanova Department of Tourism documentary and intercultural communication Open International University of human development «Ukraine»
  • Vitaliy Ignatyev Donetsk National Medical University
  • Viacheslav Stepanov SHEI "Donbas State Pedagogical University"



secularity, COVID-19 pandemy, religious-secular reality, individual consciousness, self-understanding


The question of the secularity of society still remains open, since scientists have proposed only cautious speculative answers, while every scientist understands that in the social sciences it is a sad experience of predictions, that history is random and therefore unpredictable and the future always remains fundamentally open.

The process of transformation of postmodern society, the development of which is actively influenced by the current pandemy of COVID-19, entailed the revival of religious values ​​and the formation of a qualitatively new religious consciousness. In connection with the rise in the social status of religious consciousness and the widespread dissemination of religious ideas, primarily at the everyday level, the analysis of individual religious consciousness as one of the ways to comprehend the world is of particular importance. The social nature of religious consciousness is manifested not only in the fact that religious values ​​are perceived as a kind of khanism of social regulation, but also in the fact that they serve as epistemological guidelines and often compete with scientific values. This determines the growing philosophical interest in the analysis of the epistemological functions of religion and secular reality, as well as the cognitive capabilities of religious consciousness, which is impossible without a consistent study of the methodological basis of religious knowledge.


Antonenko, T., Kachmar, O., Tsybulko, O., Grachova, T., & Konovalova, M. (2020). Scientific Approaches to Postmodern Spirituality: Theoretical and Methodological Aspects. Postmodern Openings, 11(2 Supl 1), 200-214.

Berger, P. (ed.), (1999). The Desecularization of the World. Ethics and Public Policy Center.

Berger, P., Davie, G., & Fokas, E. (eds.), (2008). Religious America, Secular Europe? A Theme and Variations. Ashgate.

Bruce, S. (2000). The Supply-Side Model of Religion: The Nordic and Baltic States. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 39(1), 32-46.

Caplow, T. H. (1985). Contrasting Trends in European and American Religion. Sociological Analysis, 46(2), 101-108.

Casanova, J. (1994). Public Religions in the Modern World. University of Chicago Press.

Casanova, J. (2003). Beyond European and American Exceptionalism: Towards a Global Comparative Perspective. In G. Davie, P. Heelas, & L. Woodehead (eds.), Predicting Religion (pp. 45-67). Ashgate.

Casanova, J. (2007). Immigration and the New Religious Pluralism: A EU/US Comparison. In T. Banchoff (ed.), Democracy and the New Religious Pluralism (pp. 59-84). Oxford University Press.

Casanova, J. (2010). A Secular Age: Dawn or Twilight. In M. Warner, J. Van Antwerpen, & C. Calhoun (eds), Varieties of Secularism in a Secular Age (pp. 55-63). Harvard University Press.

Durkheim, E. (2008). The elementary forms of religious life (C. Cosman, Trans.). Oxford University Press.

Eliade, M. (1996). Patterns in comparative religion. University of Nebraska Press.

Finke, R. (1997). The Consequences of Religious Competition: Supply-side Explanation for Religion Change. In L. A. Young (ed.), Rational Choice Theory and Religion: Summary and Assessment (81-90). Routledge.

Habermas, J., Reder, M., Schmidt, J., Brieskorn, N., & Ricken, F. (2010). An Awareness of What Is Missing: Faith and Reason in a Post-Secular Age. Polity.

Hennessey, A. (2020). Social Ontology and the Rituals of Birth. Proceedings, 47, 66.

Ikeda, D. (2018). The Wisdom of the Lotus Sutra, vol. I (2nd edition). Moscow University Press.

Markus, R. (2006). Christianity and the Secular. University of Notre Dame Press.

Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2004). Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide. Cambridge University Press.

Otto, R. (1923). The Idea of the Holy. Text of First English Edition. 117-123.

Sorensen, T., Danbolt, L. J., Lien, L., Koenig, H. G., & Holmen, J. (2011). The relationship between religious attendance and blood pressure: The HUNT Study, Norway. International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine, 42(1), 13–28.

Stark, R., & Bainbridge, W. S. (1986). The Future of Religion. University of California Press.

Stark, R., & Iannaccone, L. (1994). A Supply-side Interpretation of the «Secularization» of Europe. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 33(3), 230-252.

Svensson, N., Hvidt, N., & Nissen, S., Storsveen, M. M., Hvidt, E. A., Søndergaard, J., & Thilsing, T. (2020). Religiosity and Health-Related Risk Behaviours in a Secular Culture—Is there a Correlation? Journal of Religion and Health, 59, 2381–2396.

Warner, R. S. (1993). Work in Progress Toward a New Paradigm for the Sociological Study of Religion in the United States, American Journal of Sociology, 98(5), 1044-1093.




How to Cite

Mozghovyi, L., Muliar, V., Stepanova, O., Ignatyev, V., & Stepanov, V. (2021). Religious-Secular Reality of Individual Consciousness In The Context of COVID-19. Postmodern Openings, 12(2), 522-534.



Research on Covid-19 Pandemic

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Publish your work at the Scientific Publishing House LUMEN

It easy with us: publish now your work, novel, research, proceeding at Lumen Scientific Publishing House

Send your manuscript right now