Self-efficacy, Anxiety, Positive Affect, and Students' Expected Grades in the Context of the Bachelor Exam
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/16.2/871Keywords:
self-efficacy, positive affect, anxiety, expected academic performanceAbstract
Identifying variables that impact students' grades is a constant concern but also a challenge for teachers in the field of educational sciences. The study investigates the association between self-efficacy, positive affect, anxiety, and students' expected grades before the final exam of bachelor university studies. The study is based on Pekrun's (2006) control-value theory, and it aims to investigate the relationship between self-efficacy, anxiety, positive affect, and students' expected grades. Specifically, the study seeks to understand how anxiety mediates the relationship between self-efficacy and expected grades and how positive affect mediates the positive relationship between self-efficacy and anxiety levels. The study was conducted on 170 students from Primary and Preschool Education Pedagogy and Orthodox Pastoral Theology studying at a state university in Romania. The students completed the assessment tools that assess the research variables: general self-efficacy, positive affect, anxiety - as a self-regulated learning strategy - and the student's expected grade in the bachelor exam. The results of the structural equation modeling indicate that the level of self-efficacy has an impact on student anxiety levels. This anxiety, in turn, negatively influences the expected grades that students predict before taking the assessment tests required to complete their bachelor's studies. Therefore, anxiety acts as a mediator between self-efficacy and expected grades. Additionally, the results show that the relationship between self-efficacy and anxiety is mediated by positive affect. These findings emphasize the importance of effective teaching and learning methods that promote academic success.
References
Arch, E.C. (1987). Differential responses of females and males to evaluative stress: anxiety, self-esteem, efficacy and willingness to participate. In R. Schwarzer , H.M. Van der Ploeg & C.D. Spielberger (Eds.). Advances in test anxiety research (vol. 5., pp. 97–106). Swets & Zeitlinger.
Artino, A. R., Jr, Holmboe, E. S., & Durning, S. J. (2012). Control-value theory: using achievement emotions to improve understanding of motivation, learning, and performance in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 64. Medical teacher, 34(3), e148–e160. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.651515
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy. The exercise of control. Freeman
Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (2001). Self-efficacy beliefs as shapers of children’s aspirations and career trajectories. Child Development, 72(1), 187–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00273
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
Carroll, A., Houghton, S., Wood, R., Unsworth, K., Hattie, J., Gordon, L., & Bower, J. (2009). Self-efficacy and academic achievement in Australian high school students: The mediating effects of academic aspirations and delinquency. Journal of Adolescence, 32(4), 797–817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.10.009
Choi, N. (2005). Self-efficacy and self-concept as predictors of college students' academic performance. Psychology in the Schools, 42(2), 197–205. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20048
Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310–357. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310
Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., & Pekrun, R. (2009). Emotionen [Emotions]. In E. Wild, & J. Möller (Eds.), Pa¨dagogische Psychologie (pp. 205–234). Springer.
Goetz, T., Pekrun, R., Hall, N., & Haag, L. (2006). Academic emotions from a social-cognitive perspective: antecedents and domain specificity of students' affect in the context of Latin instruction. The British journal of educational psychology, 76(Pt 2), 289–308. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709905X42860
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Babin, B. J., & Black, W. C. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective. Pearson.
Hayat, A. A., Shateri, K., Amini, M., & Shokrpour, N. (2020). Relationships between academic self-efficacy, learning-related emotions, and metacognitive learning strategies with academic performance in medical students: a structural equation model. BMC Medical Education, 20(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-01995-9
Hayes A.F. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. Third edition. A regression-based approach. Guilford Press
Honicke, T., & Broadbent, J. (2016). The influence of academic self-efficacy on academic performance: A systematic review. Educational research review, 17, 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.11.002
Hwang, M. H., Choi, H. C., Lee, A., Culver, J. D., & Hutchison, B. (2016). The relationship between self-efficacy and academic achievement: A 5-year panel analysis. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25, 89-98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-015-0236-3
Komarraju, M., & Nadler, D. (2013). Self-efficacy and academic achievement: Why do implicit beliefs, goals, and effort regulation matter? Learning and Individual Differences, 25(1), 67–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.01.005
Kurbanoglu, N. I., & Akim, A. (2010). The relationships between university students’ chemistry laboratory anxiety, attitudes, and self-efficacy beliefs. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(8). https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2010v35n8.4
Laurian-Fitzgerald, S., & Fitzgerald, C. J. (2021). Time for teachers and students to take more control of learning. Különleges Bánásmód-Interdiszciplináris folyóirat, 7(1), 85-90. https://doi.org/10.18458/KB.2021.1.85
Leung, C. H., Chen, S. X., & Lam, B. C. (2010). Where there's a will, there's a way: The mediating effect of academic aspiration between beliefs and academic outcomes. Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies, 11(1), 53.
Lowe, P. A., Lee, S. W., Witteborg, K. M., Prichard, K. W., Luhr, M. E., Cullinan, C. M., Mildren, B. A., Raad, J. M., Cornelius, R. A., & Janik, M. (2008). The Test Anxiety Inventory for Children and Adolescents (TAICA): Examination of the psychometric properties of a new multidimensional measure of test anxiety among elementary and secondary school students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 26(3), 215–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282907303760
Meng, Q., & Zhang, Q. (2023). The Influence of Academic Self-Efficacy on University Students’ Academic Performance: The Mediating Effect of Academic Engagement. Sustainability, 15(7), 5767. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075767
Moore, M.M. (2006). Variations in test anxiety and locus of control orientation in achieving and underachieving gifted and nongifted middle school students. Doctoral Dissertations. AAI3205755.
https://digitalcommons.lib.uconn.edu/dissertations/AAI3205755
Morales-Rodríguez, F. M., & Pérez-Mármol, J. M. (2019). The role of anxiety, coping strategies, and emotional intelligence on general perceived self-efficacy in university students. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1689. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01689
Muntean, L., Vesa, A., Barth, K., & Florescu, C. M. (2021). Gaming and assessment in higher education. (pp: 530-535). In MusicoGuia (Ed.). 3rd Interdisciplinary and Virtual Conference on Arts in Education, July 14-15, 2021.Conference Proceedings CIVAE 2021. MusicoGuia.
Neghabi, Z. H., Rafiee, S. M., & Islamshahr, I. (2013). The mediating effect of academic engagement in the relationship between academic self-efficacy and academic achievement among adolescents in Tehran. Life Science Journal, 10(5s), 393-399.
Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 315–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9.
Pekrun, R., & Stephens, E. J. (2010). Achievement emotions: A control-value approach. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(4), 238-255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00259.x
Pekrun, R., Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A. (2009). Achievement goals and achievement emotions: Testing a model of their joint relations with academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 115. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013383
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Barchfeld, P., & Perry, R. P. (2011). Measuring emotions in students’ learning and performance: The Achievement Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ). Contemporary educational psychology, 36(1), 36-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.10.002
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students' self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational psychologist, 37(2), 91-105. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3702_4
Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of educational Psychology, 95(4), 667. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.667
Popa Berce, C. A., Heciu, I., & Bochis, L. (2022). Developing the level of metacognitive awareness of students with low academic performance. Pilot study conducted in the online learning environment. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 15(1), 30-37. https://doi.org/10.24193/adn.15.1.3
Putwain, D., Sander, P., & Larkin, D. (2013). Academic self-efficacy in study-related skills and behaviors: Relations with learning-related emotions and academic success. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 633–650. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.2012.02084.x
Qudsyi, H., & Putri, M. I. (2016). Self-efficacy and anxiety of national examination among high school students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 217, 268-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.02.082
Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students' academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 353–387. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026838
Robu, V. (2008). Anxietatea faţă de evaluarea orală în rândul liceenilor Oral assessment anxiety among high school students. In A. Gugiuma (Ed.), Idei şi valori perene în Ştiinţele Socio-Umane. Studii şi cercetări. TOM XIII. Argonaut
Roick, J., & Ringeisen, T. (2017). Self-efficacy, test anxiety, and academic success: A longitudinal validation. International Journal of Educational Research, 83, 84-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.12.006
Roşan, A. (2015). Psihopedagogie specială. Modele de evaluare şi intervenţie. Special psychopedagogy. Assessment and intervention models. Polirom.
Salame, R.F. (1984). Test anxiety: its determinants, manifestations and consequences. In H.M. Van der Ploeg, R. Schwarzer & C.D. Spielberger (Eds.). Advances in test anxiety research (vol 3, pp. 83–118). Swets & Zeitlinger.
Schunk, D. H., & Ertmer, P. A. (2000). Self-regulation and academic learning: Self-efficacy enhancing interventions. In M. Boekaerts, P.R. Pintrich, M. Zeidner (Eds.) Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 631-649). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50048-2
Schunk, D. H., & Meece, J. L. (2005). Self-efficacy development in adolescence. In F. Pajares, & T. C. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 71–96). Information Age Publishing.
Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized Self-Efficacy scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston, Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs (pp. 35-37). NFER-NELSON.
Strickland, B. R. (2001). The Gale Encyclopedia of Psychology. Gale Group
Tucker, L., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291170
Vasiliu, D., Marinescu, D. A., Marinescu, G., & Rizeanu, S. (2015). Evaluarea autoeficacităţii. Proprietăţi psihometrice pentru Self-Efficacy Scales: SES .Self-efficacy assessment. Psychometric Properties of Self-Efficacy Scales: The SES . Revista de studii psihologice, 2, 210–222.
Wang, C., & Liu, Y. (2000). Correlation among general self-efficacy, trait anxiety, state anxiety and test anxiety. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 8, 229-230
Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1994). The PANAS-X: Manual for the positive and negative affect schedule expanded form. University of Iowa. https://doi.org/10.17077/48vt-m4t2
Weinstein, C. E., Palmer, D. R., & Acee, T. W. (2016). LASSI 3rd Edition Learning and Study Strategies Inventory. Clearwater. H&H Publishing.
Yokoyama, S. (2019). Academic self-efficacy and academic performance in online learning: A mini-review. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2794. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02794
Zeidner, M. (1998). Test anxiety: The state of the art. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Zeidner, M. (2007). Test anxiety in educational contexts: Concepts, findings, and future directions. In P. A. Schutz, & R. Pekrun (Eds.), Emotion in Education (pp. 165–184). Academic Press.
Zhang, X., Li, W., & Wang, J. (2022). Effects of exercise intervention on students’ test anxiety: a systematic review with a meta-analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(11), 6709. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19116709
Zhao, H., Seibert, S. E., & Hills, G. E. (2005). The Mediating Role of Self-Efficacy in the Development of Entrepreneurial Intentions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1265–1272. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1265
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journalright of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND