A Qualitative, Multidimensional Approach to Understanding Disability among Romanian Adults
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/17.2/1003Keywords:
disability, disability models, religion, religious viewsAbstract
This qualitative study explored the diverse perspectives and meanings surrounding disability, focusing on how individuals understand and experience disability within various contexts. The research sample comprised 1233 Romanian adults aged 18 to 76 (Mage = 22.97, SD = 8.61), primarily females (N = 923, 74.9%). Using an in-depth qualitative approach, the study addressed a series of questions regarding disability, ranging from conceptual understandings to the personal, societal, and religious implications of living with a disability. A key focus of the study was to examine whether the attitudes of believers towards individuals with disabilities had evolved and, if so, to identify the underlying causes of these changes. Additionally, the research explored the role of religious institutions, particularly the Church, concerning disability. The answers to these questions were analyzed through the lens of disability models. The study’s findings highlight a multifaceted understanding of disability, with perspectives influenced by medical, social, and religious models. While traditional medical views remain prevalent, there is increasing recognition of the role of societal attitudes and structures in shaping disability experiences.
References
Andrews, E. E. (2017). Disability models. In M. A. Budd, S. Hough, S. T. Wegener, & W. Stiers (Eds.), Practical Psychology in Medical Rehabilitation (pp. 77–83). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34034-0_9
Berghs, M., Atkin, K., Graham, H., Hatton, C., & Thomas, C. (2016). Implications for public health research of models and theories of disability: A scoping study and evidence synthesis. Public Health Research, 4(8), 1–166.
https://doi.org/10.3310/phr04080
Black, K. (1996). A healing homiletic: Preaching and disability. Abingdon Press.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2014). What can “thematic analysis” offer health and wellbeing researchers? International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 9(1), 26152. https://doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v9.26152
Cho, J. Y., & Lee, E. (2014). Reducing confusion about grounded theory and qualitative content analysis: similarities and differences. The Qualitative Report, 19(32), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2014.1028
Flick, U., Von Kardoff, E., & Steinke, I. (2004). What is qualitative research? An introduction to the field. In U. Flick, E. Von Kardoff, & I. Steinke (Eds.), A Companion to Qualitative Research (pp. 3-12). London: Sage.
Forber-Pratt, A. J., & Zape, M. P. (2017). Disability identity development model: Voices from the ADA-generation. Disability and Health Journal, 10(2), 350–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2016.12.013
Freer, J. R. R. (2023). Students’ attitudes toward disability: A systematic literature review (2012–2019). International Journal of Inclusive Education, 27(5), 652–670. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1866688
Haegele, J. A., Hodge, S. R., & Shapiro, D. R. (Eds.). (2020). Routledge Handbook of Adapted Physical Education (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429052675
Hammer, C., Podlog, L., Wadey, R., Galli, N., Forber-Pratt, A. J., Newton, M., Hall, M., & Greviskes, L. (2019). Understanding posttraumatic growth of paratriathletes with acquired disability. Disability and Rehabilitation, 41(6), 674–682. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2017.1402961
Hodkinson, A. (2016). Key issues in special educational needs & inclusion (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd.
Hogan, A. J. (2019). Moving Away from the “Medical Model”: The Development and Revision of the World Health Organization’s Classification of Disability. Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 93(2), 241–269. https://doi.org/10.1353/bhm.2019.0028
Ibrahim, E. A. (2023). Imago Dei in Eastern Orthodox statements and implications for inclusion of people with disabilities in the church: A dissonant relationship. Horizons, 50(1), 62–109. https://doi.org/10.1017/hor.2023.9
Klimczuk, A. (2015). Social inclusion of people with disabilities: National and international perspectives by Arie Rimmerman: New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013. Human Rights Review, 16(4), 397–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-015-0381-3
Layton, N., Martin, R. A., Bourke, J. A., & Kayes, N. M. (2024). Structures of oppression or inclusion: What systemic factors impact inclusion in disability and rehabilitation research? Social Sciences, 13(5), 229. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13050229
Lindsay, S., & Edwards, A. (2013). A systematic review of disability awareness interventions for children and youth. Disability and Rehabilitation, 35(8), 623–646. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2012.702850
Maftei, A., & Gherguț, A. (2023). Adversity versus fate, genetics, and the environment: Causal beliefs and attitudes toward intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 48(4), 346–356. https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2023.2177931
Maftei, A., Gherguț, A., Roca, D., & Dănilă, O. (2023). Transitioning from decades of segregation: Religiosity and the attitudes towards intellectual disability in Romania. Journal of Beliefs & Values, 44(3), 334–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/13617672.2022.2125674
Maftei, A., & Lăzărescu, G. (2023). Where does disability come from? Causal beliefs and representations about disability among romanian children and preadolescents. Current Psychology, 42(29), 25548–25559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03897-z
Maican, P. (2022). The care of persons with intellectual disabilities in Romania: Between politics and theology. Political Theology, 23(3), 201–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/1462317X.2021.1893959
McMahon-Panther, G., & Bornman, J. (2025). Persons with disabilities in the Christian Church: A scoping review on the impact of expressions of compassion and justice on their inclusion and participation. Journal of Disability & Religion, 29(1), 81–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/23312521.2024.2331461
Miles, M. (2002). Some influences of religions on attitudes towards disabilities and people with disabilities. Journal of Religion, Disability & Health, 6(2–3), 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1300/J095v06n02_12
Miller, S. R. (2013). A curriculum focused on informed empathy improves attitudes toward persons with disabilities. Perspectives on Medical Education, 2(3), 114–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40037-013-0046-3
Mirete, A. B., Belmonte, M. L., Mirete, L., & García-Sanz, M. P. (2020). Predictors of attitudes about people with intellectual disabilities: empathy for a change towards inclusion. International journal of developmental disabilities, 68(5), 615–623. https://doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2020.1851122
Mirică, R. E., & Soare, I. (2020). The evolution of disability during the last years in Romania and EU member states. Open Journal of Preventive Medicine, 10(07), 169–174. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpm.2020.107012
Mugeere, A. B., Omona, J., State, A. E., & Shakespeare, T. (2020). “Oh God! Why did you let me have this disability?”: Religion, spirituality and disability in three African countries. Journal of Disability & Religion, 24(1), 64–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/23312521.2019.1698387
Oliver, M. (2013). The social model of disability: Thirty years on. Disability & Society, 28(7), 1024–1026. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2013.818773
Retief, M., & Letšosa, R. (2018). Models of disability: A brief overview. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 74(1). a4738. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v74i1.4738
Roth, D., Pure, T., Rabinowitz, S., & Kaufman-Scarborough, C. (2018). Disability awareness, training, and empowerment: A new paradigm for raising disability awareness on a university campus for faculty, staff, and students. Social Inclusion, 6(4), 116–124. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v6i4.1636
Scullion, P. A. (2010). Models of disability: Their influence in nursing and potential role in challenging discrimination. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 66(3), 697–707. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05211.x
Swain, J., & French, S. (2000). Towards an affirmation model of disability. Disability & Society, 15(4), 569–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590050058189
Wang, Z., Xu, X., Han, Q., Chen, Y., Jiang, J., & Ni, G.-X. (2021). Factors associated with public attitudes towards persons with disabilities: A systematic review. BMC Public Health, 21(1), 1058. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11139-3
Watson, N., & Vehmas, S. (Eds.). (2019). Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429430817
Zaks, Z. (2024). Changing the medical model of disability to the normalization model of disability: Clarifying the past to create a new future direction. Disability & Society, 39(12), 3233–3260. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2023.2255926
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The Authors & InManifest Network
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journalright of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND
