Informal Environmental Education and Green Citizenship: Greenfluencers and Romanian Gen Z’s Eco-Conscious Social Media Practices
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/17.3/1029Keywords:
informal environmental education, green citizenship, social media, greenfluencers, eco-conscious attitudes, youth engagementAbstract
The 21st century has witnessed astonishing transformation in the way the world functions, especially regarding the integration of technology in the educational landscape. Hence, in keeping with the goal of developing a highly educated populace, the educational system is currently under immense pressure to adapt to the digital age, aiming to produce graduates who can excel not only academically but also in their personal lives, professional careers, and employment. Therefore, the 21st century learning environment is receiving attention to achieve the goals of developed nations in Malaysia. A quasi-experimental research design was performed to examine the effects of the 21stcentury learning environment based on 21st Century Acculturation Module on 21st Century Skills and Academic Achievement (AA). The study included 120 form-four students who took Science subjects from secondary schools in Malaysia. Data analysis included means, standard deviations, independent sample T-test, and PLS-SEM. The result shows there were significant differences between the control group and the experimental group in terms of 21st Century Skills enhancement. Research findings also show a substantial difference in students AA between the experimental and control groups. The results gathered from PLS-SEM showed that the developed module moderates the Life and Career (LC) skills and AA relationships. It is evident that the module produced by the amalgamation of Dale’s Cone of Experiences and Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy Frameworks along with the use of technology in a Virtual Learning Environment (VLE) improved students’ 21st Century Skills, and the students also performed better in AA.
References
Anderson, K. J. (2024). What is news? Exploring differences in how younger and older cohorts use news in today’s media environment. Communication Research and Practice, 11(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2024.2344997
American Psychological Association (APA). (2023). Speaking of Psychology: Why our attention spans are shrinking, with Gloria Mark, PhD. APA Podcasts. https://www.apa.org/news/podcasts/speaking-of-psychology/attention-spans
Balaban, D., & Mustăţea, M. (2019). Users’ perspective on the credibility of social media influencers in Romania and Germany. Romanian Journal of Communication and Public Relations, 21(1), 31-46. https://doi.org/10.21018/rjcpr.2019.1.269
Balaban, D., Mustăţea, M., Culic, L., Iancu, R.I. & Pavelea, A. (2020). What determines young people to follow influencers? The role of perceived information quality and trustworthiness on users’ following intentions. Romanian Journal of Communication and Public Relations, 22 (3), 5-19. https://doi.org/10.21018/rjcpr.2020.3.306
Boerman, S. C., Meijers, M. H. C., & Zwart, W. (2022). The importance of influencer-message congruence when employing greenfluencers to promote pro-environmental behavior. Environmental Communication, 16(7), 920–941. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2022.2115525
Bootrach, P., Thiengkamol, N., & Thiengkamol, T. K. (2015). Environmental education strategy. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 14(4), 200–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533015X.2015.1096223
Breves, P., & Liebers, N. (2022). #Greenfluencing. The impact of parasocial relationships with social media influencers on advertising effectiveness and followers’ pro-environmental intentions. Environmental Communication, 16(6), 773–787. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2022.2109708
Chuan, C., Seelig, M., Tsai, W. S., & Tao, W. (2024). Eco-warrior: a theory-based mobile app intervention for forming and sustaining pro-environmental habits. Mobile Media & Communication, 13(1), 234-254. https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579241271066
De Witte, M. (2022). Gen Z are not ‘coddled.’ They are highly collaborative, self-reliant and pragmatic, according to new Stanford-affiliated research. Stanford Report. https://news.stanford.edu/stories/2022/01/know-gen-z
Dean, H. (2001). Green citizenship. Social policy and administration, 35(5), 490- 505. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9515.t01-1-00249
Dekoninck, H., & Schmuck, D. (2022). The mobilizing power of influencers for pro-environmental behavior intentions and political participation. Environmental Communication, 16(4), 458–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2022.2027801
Deliana, Y., & Rum, I. A. (2019). How does perception on green environment across generations affect consumer behavior? A neural network process. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 43(4), 358-367. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12515
Dragolea, L. L., Butnaru, G. I., Kot, S., Zamfir, C.G., Nuţă, A.C., Nuţă, F.M., Cristea, D.S. & Ştefănică, M. (2023). Determining factors in shaping the sustainable behavior of the generation Z consumer. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11, https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1096183
Dobson, A. (1995). Green Political Thought (2nd ed.). Routledge
Eichorn, J., Solaz, A. G., & White, P. (2022). Shifting paradigms. Public perceptions of economic policy in shaping the climate crisis. Open Society Foundations. https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/publications/shifting-paradigms
European Commission. (2020). Attitudes of Europeans towards the Environment. https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/2257
ENEC - European Network for Environmental Citizenship (2018). Defining Environmental Citizenship. https://enec-cost.eu/our-approach/enec-environmental-citizenship/
Gabrielson, T. (2008). Green citizenship: a review and critique. Citizenship Studies, 12(4), 429–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621020802184275
IPCC - The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2022). IPCC sixth assessment report. Working group III: Mitigation of climate change. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3/
Huber, B., Lepenies, R., Quesada Baena, L., & Allgaier, J. (2022). Beyond individualized responsibility attributions? How eco influencers communicate sustainability on TikTok. Environmental Communication, 16(6), 713–722. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2022.2131868
Hutchinson, A. (2022, August 24). New report show that reels are generating the most reach on Instagram. Social media today. https://www.socialmediatoday.com/news/new-report-show-that-reels-are-generating-the-most-reach-on-instagram/630454/
IRES - Institutul Român pentru Evaluare şi Strategie (2023). Schimbări climatice şi încălzire globală. (ediţia a-3-a). Percepţii, atitudini şi comportamente ale românilor. https://ires.ro/articol/446/schimbari-climatice--i-inc%C4%83lzire-global%C4%83-(edi%C8%9Bia-a-3-a,-2023)
Jung, J., Petkanic, P., Nan, D., & Kim, J. H. (2020). When a girl awakened the world: A user and social message analysis of Greta Thunberg. Sustainability, 12(7), https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072707
Kapoor, P.S., Balaji, M.S., & Jiang, Y. (2023). Greenfluencers as agents of social change: the effectiveness of sponsored messages in driving sustainable consumption. European Journal of Marketing, 57(2), 533-561. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-10-2021-0776
Kim, E., & Drumwright, M. (2016). Engaging consumers and building relationships in social media: How social relatedness influences intrinsic vs. extrinsic consumer motivation. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 970-979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.025
Knupfer, H., Neureiter, A. & Matthes, J. (2023). From social media diet to public riot? Engagement with “greenfluencers” and young social media users’ environmental activism. Computers in Human Behavior, 139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107527
Lapresta-Romero, S., Becker, L., Hernández-Ortega, B., Terho, H., & Franco, J. L. (2024). Getting the recipe right: how content combinations drive social media engagement behaviors. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 0(0) https://doi.org/10.1177/1094996824125169
Machin, A., & Tan, E. (2022). Green European citizenship? Rights, duties, virtues, practices and the European green deal. European Politics and Society, 25(1), 152–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2022.2118984
MFB (2024). Media FactBook Romania. https://mediafactbook.ro/#download
Mihăilă, M., Jităreanu, A. F., & Costuleanu, C. L. (2022). The environmental values - A study on the students’ perception, attitudes and behaviours. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 14(1), 465-483. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/14.1/529
Munnukka, J., Uusitalo, O., & Toivonen, H. (2016). Credibility of a peer endorser and advertising effectiveness. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 33(3), 182-192. https://doi.org/10.1108/jcm-11-2014-1221
Ohanian, R. (1990). Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers' perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. Journal of Advertising, 19(3), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1990.10673191
Olbermann, Z., Mayer, F., & Schramm, H. (2024). Greenfluencing through the power of emotions? Impact of message frames and emotionally matching background music on the effectiveness of influencers’ environmental communication. Social Media + Society, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051241254381
Oliver Wyman Forum. (2023). A Gen Z report. What business needs to know about the generation changing everything. https://www.oliverwymanforum.com/content/dam/oliver-wyman/ow-forum/template-scripts/a-gen-z/pdf/A-Gen-Z-Report.pdf
Oxley, L. & Morris, P. (2013). Global citizenship: A typology for distinguishing its multiple conceptions. British Journal of Educational Studies, 61(3), 301–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2013.798393
Pashby, K., Da Costa, M., Stein, S., & Andreotti, V. (2020). A meta-review of typologies of global citizenship education. Comparative Education, 56(2), 144–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2020.1723352
Pittman, M., & Abell, A. (2021). More trust in fewer followers: diverging effects of popularity metrics and green orientation social media influencers. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 56(1), 70-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2021.05.
Petrescu-Mag, R. M., Petrescu, D. C., Iván, A., & Tenter, A. R. (2023). An intergenerational reading of climate change-health concern nexus: a qualitative study of the millennials’ and gen z participants’ perceptions. BMC Public Health, 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15353-z
Schattle, H. (2008). Education for global citizenship: illustrations of ideological pluralism and adaptation. Journal of Political Ideologies, 13(1), 73–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310701822263
Sharma, A. P. (2021). Consumers’ purchase behaviour and green marketing: A synthesis, review and agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45(6), 1217–1238. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12722
Stahl, C. C., & Literat, I. (2022). #GenZ on TikTok: the collective online self-portrait of the social media generation. Journal of Youth Studies, 26(7), 925–946. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2022.2053671
Stock, P. V., Darby, D. B., & Meyer, K. (2017). Teaching the environment with collaboration: Photo essays across disciplines. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 17(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533015X.2017.1348273
UNDP (2024). People’s climate vote 2024. https://www.undp.org/publications/peoples-climate-vote-2024
UNESCO (n.d). UNESCO Green citizens. https://www.unesco.org/en/green-citizens
Toma, S.G., Grădinaru, C.,Hudea, O.S., & Modreanu, A. (2023) Perceptions and attitudes of generation Z students towards the responsible management of smart cities. Sustainability, 15(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813967
WeAreSocial (2023). Digital 2023. Global overview report. https://wearesocial.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Digital-2023-Global-Overview-Report.pdf
Xiao, M., Wang, R., & Chan-Olmsted, S. (2018). Factors affecting YouTube influencer marketing credibility: a heuristic-systematic model. Journal of Media Business Studies, 15(3), 188–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/16522354.2018.1501146
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The Authors & InManifest Network

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journalright of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND