The Malaysian Digital Classroom Experiment: Quantifying the FF21A Module’s Impact on Higher-Order Thinking

Authors

  • Siti Faizzatul Aqmal Mohamad Mohsin Department of Engineering Technology, Faculty of Technical and Vocational, University Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Perak, Malaysia
  • Siti Fairuz Yusoff Department of Agricultural Science, Faculty of Technical and Vocational, University Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Perak, Malaysia
  • Norhidayah Hamdan Department of Engineering Technology, Faculty of Technical and Vocational, University Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Perak, Malaysia
  •  Azizul Qayyum Basri Department of Engineering Technology, Faculty of Technical and Vocational, University Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Perak, Malaysia
  • Abdul Muqsith Ahmad Department of Engineering Technology, Faculty of Technical and Vocational, University Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Perak, Malaysia
  • NurulAsyikin Hassan Department of History, Faculty of Human Sciences, University Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Perak, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/17.3/1028

Keywords:

21st century pedagogy, 21st century skills, technology in education, higher order thinking skills

Abstract

The 21st century has witnessed astonishing transformation in the way the world functions, especially regarding the integration of technology in the educational landscape. Hence, in keeping with the goal of developing a highly educated populace, the educational system is currently under immense pressure to adapt to the digital age, aiming to produce graduates who can excel not only academically but also in their personal lives, professional careers, and employment. Therefore, the 21st century learning environment is receiving attention to achieve the goals of developed nations in Malaysia. A quasi-experimental research design was performed to examine the effects of the 21stcentury learning environment based on 21st Century Acculturation Module on 21st Century Skills and Academic Achievement (AA). The study included 120 form-four students who took Science subjects from secondary schools in Malaysia. Data analysis included means, standard deviations, independent sample T-test, and PLS-SEM. The result shows there were significant differences between the control group and the experimental group in terms of 21st Century Skills enhancement. Research findings also show a substantial difference in students AA between the experimental and control groups. The results gathered from PLS-SEM showed that the developed module moderates the Life and Career (LC) skills and AA relationships. It is evident that the module produced by the amalgamation of Dale’s Cone of Experiences and Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy Frameworks along with the use of technology in a Virtual Learning Environment (VLE) improved students’ 21st Century Skills, and the students also performed better in AA.

Author Biography

 Azizul Qayyum Basri, Department of Engineering Technology, Faculty of Technical and Vocational, University Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Perak, Malaysia

   

References

Ab Liah, N. S. N. A., & Ismail, H. (2023). Exploration of challenges by kafa teachers in implementing higher-order thinking skills (hots) in primary schools In Malaysia. Journal of Islamic, 8(53), 549-558. http://irep.iium.edu.my/id/eprint/105749

Abu Talib, S., Mohamad Nasri, N., & Mahmud, M. S. (2025). The readiness of mathematics teachers as agents of change: a recent comprehensive review. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 14(2), 1468-1476. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v14i2.30291

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.

Bonk, C. J., & Wiley, D. A. (2020). Preface: Reflections on the waves of emerging learning technologies. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(4), 1595–1612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09809-x

Chu, S. K. W., Reynolds, R. B., Tavares, N. J., Notari, M., & Lee, C. W. Y. (2021). 21st Century skills development through inquiry-based learning from theory to practice. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2481-8

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed).Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587

Darus, M. M., Ashamuddin, H., & Abdullah, N. S. Y. (2023). The Development of an Interactive Learning Module for Physics Subject in Post-Secondary Institution: A Need Analysis. Journal of Science and Mathematics Letters, 11(1), 83-90.https://doi.org/10.37134/jsml.vol11.1.12.2023

Diana, N. (2021). Analysis of teachers’ difficulties in implementing stem approach in learning: a study literature. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806.https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012219

Gürsoy, G. (2021). Digital storytelling: developing 21st century skills in science education. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 97-113. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.1.97

Hague, C. (2024). Fostering higher-order thinking skills online in higher education: A scoping review. OECD Education Working Papers, (306). https://doi.org/10.1787/84f7756a-en

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7

Ibrahim, N., Mohamed, M., Seshaiyer, P., Rasid, N. S. M., Dalim, S. F., Salleh, M. F. M., & Yusoff, M. M. M. (2024). Enhancing prospectives educators’ readiness through multidisciplinary collaboration in STEM education: An analysis of students enrolled in science and mathematics majors at a Public University in Malaysia. Asian Journal of University Education, 20(2), 303-315.https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v20i2.27000

Idris, R., Govindasamy, P., Nachiappan, S., &Bacotang, J. (2023). Revolutionizing STEM education: Unleashing the potential of STEM interest career in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(7), 1741-1752. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i7/17608

Kim How, R. P. T., Zulnaidi, H., & Abdul Rahim, S. S. (2022). HOTS in quadratic equations: teaching style preferences and challenges faced by Malaysian teachers. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(1), 15-33.https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/11382

Kliziene, I., Taujanskiene, G., Augustiniene, A., Simonaitiene, B., & Cibulskas, G. (2021). The impact of the virtual learning platform EDUKA on the academic performance of primary school children. Sustainability, 13(4), 2268. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042268

Liu, D., & Zhang, H. (2022). Improving students’ higher order thinking skills and achievement using WeChat-based flipped classroom in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 27(5), 7281–7302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10934-8

Markus, L., Sungkim, S., & Ishak, M. Z. B. (2021). Issues and challenges in teaching secondary school quantum physics with integrated STEM education in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 6(5), 190-202. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v6i5.774

Marouli, C. (2021). Sustainability education for the future? Challenges and implications for education and pedagogy in the 21st century. Sustainability, 13(5), 2901.https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052901

McDiarmid, G. W., & Zhao, Y. (2023). Time to rethink: Educating for a technology-transformed world. ECNU Review of Education, 6(2), 189–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311221142040

Muhammad, S., & Noor Ibrahim, N. (2022). Readiness of STEM Teachers to implement STEM education in coastal schools. International Online Journal of Language, Communication, and Humanities, 52-70.http://103.101.244.124/journal/index.php/insaniah/article/view/215

Noroozi, O., Banihashem, S. K., Biemans, H. J. A., Smits, M., Vervoort, M. T. W., & Verbaan, C. L. (2023). Design, implementation, and evaluation of an online supported peer feedback module to enhance students’ argumentative essay quality. Education and Information Technologies, 28(10), 12757–12784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11683-y.

OECD (2019). An OECD learning framework 2030. In: Bast, G., Carayannis, E.G., Campbell, D.F.J. (eds) The Future of Education and Labor. Arts, Research, Innovation and Society. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26068-2_3

OECD (2023). OECD Digital Education Outlook 2023: Towards an Effective Digital Education Ecosystem. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/c74f03de-en.

Ong, S. G. T., & Quek, G. C. L. (2023). Enhancing teacher–student interactions and student online engagement in an online learning environment. Learning Environments Research, 26(3), 681-707, 2023.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-022-09447-5

Pinheiro, R., Tømte, C.E., Barman, L., Degn, L., Geschwind, L. (2023). Digital transformations in nordic higher education: a step towards unpacking a multifaceted and emergent phenomenon. In R., Pinheiro, C., Edelhard Tømte, L., Barman, L., Degn, L., Geschwind. (eds.). Digital Transformations in Nordic Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27758-0_1

Saad, A., & Zainudin, S. (2022). A review of Project-Based Learning (PBL) and Computational Thinking (CT) in teaching and learning. Learning and Motivation, 78, 101802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2022.101802

Subramony, D. P. (2003). Dale’s cone revisited: critically examining the misapplication of a nebulous theory to guide practice. Educational Technology, 43(4), 25–30. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44428845

Fossland, T., & Tømte, C. E. (2020). Technology as quality work? Educational leaders and teachers’ use of digital technology, Quality Work in Higher Education: Organisational and Pedagogical Dimensions, 57-77, 2020.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41757-4_4

Timotheou, S., Miliou, O., Dimitriadis, Y., Sobrino, S. V., Giannoutsou, N., Cachia, R., &Loannou, A. (2023). Impacts of digital technologies on education and factors influencing schools' digital capacity and transformation: A literature review. Education and information technologies, 28(6), 6695-6726.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11431-8

Tsibulnikova, V. E. (2022). Priorities of educational policy, pedagogical science and practice in the digital age, or seven maxims of modern pedagogy. Moscow Pedagogical Journal, (1), 6-26. https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-7219-2022-1-6-26

Van Laar, E., Van Deursen, A. J., Van Dijk, J. A., & De Haan, J. (2020). Determinants of 21st-century skills and 21st-century digital skills for workers: A systematic literature review. Sage Open, 10(1), https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019900176

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Wannapiroon, N., & Pimdee, P. (2022). Thai undergraduate science, technology, engineering, arts, and math (STEAM) creative thinking and innovation skill development: A conceptual model using a digital virtual classroom learning environment. Education and Information Technologies, 27(4), 5689–5716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10819-2

Xu, D. & Jaggars, S. (2014). Performance gaps between online and face-to-face courses: differences across types of students and academic subject areas. The Journal of Higher Education, 85(5). https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2014.0028

Yu, Z., Hu, R., Ling S., Zhuang, J., Chen, Y., Chen, M., & Lin Y., (2021). Effects of blended versus offline case-centred learning on the academic performance and critical thinking ability of undergraduate nursing students: A cluster randomised controlled trial. Nurse Education in Practice, 53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103080

Downloads

Published

2025-09-19

How to Cite

Mohamad Mohsin, S. F. A., Yusoff, S. F., Hamdan, N., Basri, AzizulQ., Ahmad, A. M., & Hassan, N. . (2025). The Malaysian Digital Classroom Experiment: Quantifying the FF21A Module’s Impact on Higher-Order Thinking. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 17(3), 394-416. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/17.3/1028

Issue

Section

Reform, Change and Innovation in Education