DIFFICULTIES OF THE EVALUATION OF CORPORATE DAMAGE

Authors

  • Calina JUGASTRU University professor PHD. Faculty of Law, „Lucian Blaga” University, Sibiu

Keywords:

Bodily injury, elements, assessment, difficulties, criteria.

Abstract

The Romanian Civil Code follows the internationally promoted line in the right for repairing the corporeal injury. First of all, it uses a new classification of the prejudices - a tripartite classification of the Quebec Civil Code: material damages, non-patrimonial damages and corporeal damages. It is then welcomed the regulation (even incompletely) of some of the non-patrimonial components of the corporeal prejudice (such as the recreational prejudice, in article 1391 paragraph 1 of the Civil Code); the regulation of the reparation forms, both for the material damage and for the extra-patrimonial damage; the regulation (again, incomplete) of the non-patrimonial damage of the indirect victims (damage by ricochet); regulating the prejudice consists in losing the opportunity, the source being the offense or the contract; the inclusion, in the reparable damage, of the expenses incurred in order to avoid or minimize damage.

References

Albu, I., & Ursa, V. (1979). Răspunderea civilă pentru daunele morale [Civil liability for moral damages], Dacia Publishing House, Cluj-Napoca.

Albu, I. (1997). Repararea prejudiciului cauzat prin vătămări corporale [Repairing the prejudice caused by corporeal injuries], Lumina Lex Publishing House, Bucharest.

Boar, M. (1998), Răspunderea civilă pentru prejudiciile extrapatrimoniale (problema reparării daunelor morale) [Civil liability for the extrapatrimonial damages (the issue of repairing moral damages)], Doctoral thesis, "Babeş-Bolyai" University of Cluj-Napoca.

Brun, Ph., & Gout, O. (2012). Responsabilité civile, Panorama, novembre 2010-novembre 2011, în Recueil Dalloz, no. 1/5 January, Études et commentaires.

Chartier, Y. (1984). La réparation du préjudice, Dalloz, Paris.

Dănişor, D. (2007). Drept civil. Obligaţiile [Civil law. Obligations], translation made by Wolters Kluver Publishing House, Bucharest.

Lambert-Faivre, Y. (1993). L’indemnisation des victimes post transfusionnelles du SIDA; hier, aujourd’hui et demain..., în Revue trimestrielle de droit civil, no. 1.

Lambert-Faivre., Y., Porchy-Simon, S. (2015). Droit du dommage corporelle. Systèmes d’indemnisation, 7e édition, Dalloz, Paris, 2012, nº 22, apud M. Le Roy, Lambert-Faivre, Y. (2000). Droit du dommage corporel. Systèmes d’indemnisation, Dalloz, Paris.

Lambert-Faivre., Y., Porchy-Simon, S. (2009). Droit du dommage corporel. Systèmes d’indemnisation, 6e édition,Dalloz, Paris.

Lambert-Faivre., Y., Porchy-Simon, S. (2012). Droit du dommage corporelle. Systèmes d’indemnisation, 7e édition, Dalloz, Paris, nº 22.

Flour, J., Aubert, J.L., Savaux, E. (2009). Droit civil. Les obligations. 2. Le fait juridique, 13e édition, Dalloz, Paris).

Hivert, P., Arcadio., D., Grandguillotte, J.-M. (2007). Regards croisés pour une nouvelle expertise médicale issue de la nomenclature Dintilhac, în Gazette du Palais, 17-19 June.

Hirsch, E. (1994). Responsabilités humaines pour temps de SIDA, Collection Les empêcheurs de penser en rond, Synthélabo Groupe.

Jugastru, C. (2013). Prejudiciul – repere româneşti în context european [Prejudice - Romanian landmarks in European context], Hamangiu Publishing House, Bucharest.

Légier, G. (2001). Droit civil. Les obligations, 17e édition, Dalloz, Paris.

Malaurie, Ph., Aynès., L., Stoffel-Munck, Ph. (2007). Drept civil. Obligaţiile [Civil law. Obligations], translation made by D. Dănişor, Wolters Kluver Publishing House, Bucharest. Medina

Crespo, M. (2000). La valoración civil des danõ corporal. Bases para un tratado, tomo V, Las lesiones temporales, Dykinsdon, Madrid.

Melennec, L. (2000). Évaluation du handicap et du dommage corporel, Masson, Paris.

Melennec, L. (1976). L’indemnisation du préjudice d’agrément, în Gazette du Palais, January-February. Melennec, L. (1974). L’indemnisation du quantum doloris, in Gazette du Palais, July-August.

Melennec, L. (1977). Le préjudice sexuel (damnum sexuale), in Gazette du Palais, Doctrine, November 3.

Neculaescu, S. (2016). Dreptul victimei la repararea prejudiciului în cadrul răspunderii delictuale. Privire critică. Drept comparat [The victims' right to compensation for damage under the tort liability. Critical view. Comparative law], in the magazine Universul Juridic, no.9.

Neculaescu, S. (2017). Reflecţii privind soluţiile noului Cod civil în materia răspunderii civile delictuale [Reflections on the solutions of the new Civil Code in matters of civil liability], in the magazine Universul Juridic, no. 5.

Pradel, X. (2004). Le préjudice dans le droit civil de la responsabilité, Librairie Générale de Droit et de Jurisprudence, Paris.

Pop, L. (2010). Tabloul general al răspunderii civile în textele Noului Cod civil [The general picture of the civil liability in the texts of the New Civil Code], in Pop, L. Contribuţii la studiul obligaţiilor civile [Contributions to the study of civil obligations], Universul Juridic Publishing House, Bucharest.

Pop, L., Popa, I.-F., Vidu, S.I. (2012). Tratat elementar de drept civil. Obligaţiile [Elementary civil law treaty. Obligations], Universul Juridic Publishing House, Bucharest.

Le Roy, M., Le Roy, J.-D., Bisbal, F. (2015). L’évaluation du préjudice corporel. Expertises-principes-indemnités, 20e édition, LexisNexis, Paris

Savatier, E. (1999). Le principe indemnitaire à l’épreuve des jurisprudences civiles et administratives. À propos de l’indemnisation des victimes de transfusions sanguines, in Semaine Juridique, Édition générale, no. 13/31.03.1999.

Urs, I. (1999). Înţelesul noţiunii de prejudiciu de agrement, temei de reparare bănească a daunelor morale [The meaning of the notion of recreational prejudice, basis for monetary reparation of moral damages], in Dreptul, no. 2.

Vintila, Gh, Furtuna, C. (2000). Daunele morale. Studiu de doctrină şi de jurisprudenţă [Moral damages. Doctrine and jurisprudence study], All Beck Publishing House, Bucharest.

Vasilescu, P.(2012). Obligaţiile [Obligations], Hamangiu Publishing House, Bucharest.

Viney, G., Markesinis, B. (1985). La réparation du dommage corporel, Economica, Paris. Rapport du groupe de travail chargé d’élaborer une nomenclature des préjudices corporels (the working group was coordinated by JeanPierre Dintilhac), p. 1, available on the page http://www.aredoc.com/system/files/Rapport%20Dintilhac.pdf, consulted at May 30, 2017. The Dintilhac nomenclature is available at the address http://www.anvven.net/archives_PDF/Nomenclature_Dintilhac.pd f. The project of the normative act that uses the Dintilhac nomenclature can be consulted at the addresses http://www.justice.gouv.fr/publication/dacs/consult/20141120- projetdecret.pdf şi http://www.justice.gouv.fr/publication/dacs/consult/20141120- projetannexe.pdf (documents available at May 24, 2017).

Raportul privind indemnizarea prejudiciului corporal [The report concerning the compensation of the bodily injury] (elaborated by Yvonne Lambert-Faivre) is available on the page http://www.justice.gouv.fr/art_pix/syntheseindemcorp.pdf 8, consulted at June 15, 2017).

Downloads

Published

2018-11-07

How to Cite

JUGASTRU, C. (2018). DIFFICULTIES OF THE EVALUATION OF CORPORATE DAMAGE. Jurnalul De Studii Juridice, 13(1-2), 43-66. Retrieved from https://lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/jls/article/view/1160

Issue

Section

International Law. European Law. Comparative Law

Most read articles by the same author(s)