TRADITION AND INNOVATION IN THE PROTECTION OF PERSONAL DATA MATTER
Keywords:
protection of individuals concerning the processing of the personal character data, Regulation no. 679 and Directive no. 680 have as object the processing operations of personal data and reflect the review process (of Directive 1995/46).Abstract
The formula of the regulation is inspired for the protection of individuals concerning the processing of the personal character data, and the free movement of such data. Directive 1995/46 presented the disadvantage (inherent to the directives, in general) of the uneven application of its provisions in the national legislations. The regulation meets the mission to normatively harmonize and benefits from immediate, direct and priority application in the European states law.
We are interested, in this analysis context, only in the regulatory framework, which, face to face with Directive 1995/46, reveals undeniable progress, but also aspects that the future practice of processing personal data could qualify as imperfections. We emphasize below, some of the significant elements of similarity, respectively of differentiation, which are imposed from the first reading of the new normative act. The details and, especially, the complex explanations concerning the legal texts belong to some distinct analyzes.
How to cite: Jugastru, C. (2016). Tradition and innovation in the protection of personal data matter. Jurnalul de Studii Juridice, Year XI, No. 3-4, December 2016, 45-56.
References
N,. D., Costescu. (2016), Google Spain Decision – An Analysis of the Right to be Forgotten – A Regression from Past Interpretaions of ECJ, in the Annals of the Bucharest University, Law Series.
C., Jugastru. (2017), Tadition and innovation in the protection of personal data matter, Universul Juridic, Bucuresti, [Juridic Universe], no. 2.
A., Lepage. (2002), Libertés et droit fondamentaux à l’épreuve de l’internet, Litec, Paris.
V., Rossonni. (2004), Publicité indésirable et nouvelles technologies. Étude du ‹‹spamming›› en droit comparé, Mémoire, Université Robert Schuman, Strasbourg III.
D.-M., Şandru. (2015), Regimul juridic al protecţiei datelor cu caracter personal este în proces de regândire, în Revista Română de Drept al Afacerilor,[ The legal regime of protecting the personal character data is in the process of rethinking, in the Romanian Journal of Business Law], no. 3.
E., Tăvală. (2/2015) Religia la locul de muncă în jurisprudenţa Curţii Europene a Drepturilor Omului, in Acta Universitatis Lucian Blaga, Seria Iurisprudentia, no. 2.
Dictionnaire juridique des termes techniques, Lamy Droit des médias et de la communication, édition novembre 2001, tome I,
http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=184668&pageIndex=0&doclang=FR&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=1025819, page consulted at January 20, 2017).
La justice européenne condamne Google à offrir un droit à l'oubli, material available on the website: http://www.liberation.fr/ecrans/2014/05/13/la-justice-europeenne-condamne-google-a-offrir-un-droit-a-l-oubli_1016143 (accessed at January 7, 2017).
The French press states that on March 24, 2016, Google recorded 400000 requests, examined more than 1,4 million links and supressed 42,6% of them (A. Guitton, «Droit à l’oubli»: la Cnil inflexible face à Google, material available on the page: http://www.liberation.fr/futurs/2016/
/25/droit-a-l-oubli-la-cnil-inflexible-face-a-google_1441904, consulted at January 7, 2017).
Press release no. 70/2014, in the case C-131/12, Google Spain SL, Google Inc./Agencia Española de Protección de Datos, Mario Costeja González (available at the address http://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/
application/pdf/2014-05/cp140070ro.pdf, consulted at January 9, 2017).
