Towards an Understanding of Ethics as a Legitimizing Structure in the Context of Transhumanism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/lumenphs/10.1/62Keywords:
ethics, legitimizing structures, transhumanismAbstract
In every historical period man has been guided by ethical and/or moral imperatives. According to them, his behavior must not harm other individuals. If the man of Modernity was under the empire of the Kantian categorical imperative, the postmodern individual is looking for an ethics of our times. Along with postmodernity, the technique and technology that change in the state of being of the individual is developing more and more. All this has contributed to the emergence of new problems that ethics tries to offer solutions to.
References
Apostu, I. (2013). Consensual union in Romania–on the transition of social mentalities and legal postmodernism. In A. Sandu, & A. Caras, (eds.). Tradition an Reform Social Reconstruction of Europe (pp. 17-20). MEDIMOND-Monduzzi Editore International Proceedings Division.
Apostu, I., & Petrescu, C. (2017). Bărbatul şi femeia: imaginea unei polemici cu privire la echitatea de gen [The man and the woman: the image of a polemic regarding gender equity]. Lumen Publishing House.
Ardilla, L. F. M. (2007). La nocion de paradigma [The notion of paradigm]. Revista Signo y Pensamiento [Sign and Thought Journal], 26(50), 34-45. https://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/signoypensamiento/article/view/3705
Bagdasar, N., Bogdan, V., & Narly, C. (coord.), (1995). Antologie filosofică. Filosofi străini [Philosophical anthology. Foreign philosophers]. Universal Dalsi Publishing House.
Barbu, D. (2016). Drept procesual penal. Partea generală [Criminal Procedural Law. The general part]. Lumen Publishing House.
Barbu, D., Pană, A-M., & Popoiag, A. (2019). Competenta judecatorului de camera preliminara [The competence of the judge of the preliminary chamber]. Lumen Publishing House.
Bellu, N. (1974). Etica lui Kant [Kant's ethics]. Scientific Publishing House.
Contreras, R. R. (2004). El paradigma cientifico segun Kuhn. Desarrollo de las ciencias: del conocimiento artesanal hasta la ciencia normal [The scientific paradigm according to Kuhn. Development of the sciences: from craft knowledge to normal science]. Revista de la VI Escuela Venezolana para la Enseñanza de la Química [Magazine of the VI Venezuelan School for the Teaching of Chemistry], 43-51. http://webdelprofesor.ula.ve/ciencias/ricardo/PDF/Paradigma_Cientifico_segun_Kuhn.pdf
Croitoru, R. (2006). Datorii morale și datorii religioase în limitele kantiene ale rațiunii [Moral Duties and Religious Duties within the Kantian Limits of Reason]. All Publishing House.
Drăgan, G. (2009). Despre contribuția lui Thomas Kuhn în istoria științei [On Thomas Kuhn's contribution to the history of science]. Noema, 8, 271-278. http://noema.crifst.ro/ARHIVA/2009_c_01.pdf
Ferrer, J., & Alvarez, J. C. (2003). Para fundamentar la bioetica. Teorias y paradigmas teoricos en la bioetica contemporanea [To support bioethics. Theories and theoretical paradigms in contemporary bioethics]. Universidad Pontificia de Comillas.
Flonta, M., & Keul, H. K. (coord.), (2000). Filosofia practică a lui Kant [Kant's practical philosophy]. Polirom Publishing House.
Gonzales, F. (2005). Que es un paradigma? Analisis teorico, conceptual y psicolinguistico del termino [What is a paradigm? Theoretical, conceptual and psycholinguistic analysis of the term]. Revista Investigacion y Postgrado [Research and Postgraduate Journal], 20(1), 13-54. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/658/65820102.pdf
Goodin, R. (2006). Utilitatea și binele [Utility and goodness]. In P. Singer (ed.), Tratat de etică [[Treatise on ethics]]. Polirom Publishing House.
Gracia, D. (2008). Fundamentos de bioetica [Fundamentals of bioethics]. Triacasterla.
Grenier, H. (1995). Marile doctrine morale [The great moral doctrines]. Humanitas Publishing House.
Hare, R. M. (1997). Sorting out Ethics. Clarendon Press.
Huidu, A. (2018). Redefining Autonomy, Dignity and Intimacy in a Postmodern Society. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 10(3), 112-118. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/67
Iliescu, A. P. (2007). Etică socială și politică [Social and political ethics]. Ars Docendi Publishing House.
Kant, I. (1989). Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals (2nd Edition). Pearson.
Kant, I. (2010). Critique of Practical Reason. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
Kelly, P. (2008). Bentham. In D. Boucher, & P. Kelly (eds.), Mari gânditori politici de la Socrate până astăzi [Great political thinkers from Socrates to today] (pp. 283-288). All.
Kuhn, T. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
Leoca, Ş. (2005). Kant și Hegel despre purtători de adevăr [Kant and Hegel on truth bearers]. Studia Theologica Babeş-Bolyai, 3(2), 132-140. http://studia.ubbcluj.ro/arhiva/abstract.php?editie=THEOLOGIA%20CATHOLICA&nr=2&an=2006&id_art=4074
Massini-Correas, C. (2004). Existe un principio etico de la autonomia? Consideraciones a partir de la bioetica contemporanea [Is there an ethical principle of autonomy? Considerations from contemporary bioethics]. Anuario de la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad de La Coruña [Yearbook of the Faculty of Law of the University of La Coruña], 8, 487-504. https://ruc.udc.es/dspace/bitstream/handle/2183/2328/AD-8-27.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Matei, O. (2010). Etica principiu – abordarea deontologică în administraţia publică [Ethics as principle – deonthological approach in public administration]. Revista de Administrație Publică și Politici Sociale [[The Public Administration and Social Policies Review]], 1, 5-12. https://revad.uvvg.ro/files/nr1/Articol%201%20-%20Oana%20Matei.pdf
Miroiu, A. (2009). Introducere în filosofia politică [Introduction to political philosophy]. Polirom Publishing House.
Nietzsche, F. (1993). Despre genealogia moralei. O scriere polemică adăugată recentei „Dincolo de bine și de rău” spre împlinire și înțelegere [On the genealogy of morality. A polemical writing added to the recent "Beyond Good and Evil" for fulfillment and understanding] (trans. by H. Stanca & J.Ianoși). Echinox Publishing House.
Perez, J. P. & Sordo, J. E. (2010). Las concepciones morales de la corriente utilitarista y su influencia en la bioetica [The moral conceptions of the utilitarian current and its influence on bioethics]. Revista Ambito Juridico [Legal Field Journal], 13(83). https://ambitojuridico.com.br/edicoes/revista-83/las-concepciones-morales-de-la-corriente-utilitarista-y-su-influencia-en-la-bioetica/
Rodriguez, E. M. (2007). Una aproximacion a los conceptos: paradigma, modernidad y postmodernidad [An approach to the concepts: Paradigm, Modernity and Postmodernity]. Revista Educare, 11(1). https://revistas.investigacion-upelipb.com/index.php/educare/article/view/338/324
Sandu, A. (2021a). Etică și deontologie profesională (ediția a II-a) [Professional Ethics and Deontology (2nd Edition)]. Lumen Publishing House.
Sandu, A. (2021b). Filosofia orientului si fizica moderna [Oriental philosophy and modern physics]. Lumen Publishing House.
Sandu, A., & Damian, S-I. (2018). Perceived quality of life and responsibility for own health condition. Micro-research. Archiv Euromedica, 8(2), 18-23.
Singer, P. (1999). Practical Ethics (second edition). Cambridge University Press.
Stavilă, A. (2011). Kant și practicile interpretării [Kant and the practices of interpretation]. Hermeneia – Journal of Hermeneutics, Art Theory and Criticism [Hermeneia – Journal of Hermeneutics, Art Theory and Criticism], 4, 100-105. http://hermeneia.ro/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/stavila-nr.-4_0.pdf
Zuniga, J. B., Ostiguin Melendez, R. M., & Gonzales, A. B. (2013). El paradigma: un analisis del concepto y su implicacion conceptual en enfermeria [The paradigm: an analysis of the concept and its conceptual implication in nursing]. Revista Iberoamericana de educacion e investigacion en enfermeria [Ibero-American Journal of Nursing Education and Research], 3(2), 18-25. https://www.enfermeria21.com/revistas/aladefe/articulo/67/el-paradigma-un-analisis-del-concepto-y-su-implicacion-conceptual-en-enfermeria/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
LUMEN PHS Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND
