Resuscitation Narration. Some Comments Written afterwards in the Margins of if “If I Were Told the Experience of Medical and Surgical Resuscitation...” The Resuscitation Notebooks of Benoît Misset. The Ethical Powers of Writing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/lumenphs/12.1/82Keywords:
affect(ivity), consciousness / unconsciousness, device(s), dysorthography, family, language (vernacular and symbolic), laws, machine(s), passions, redactor and writer, religious, resuscitation, sacredAbstract
The experiment that we are going to report here on new terms and about which we are going to reflect from a different perspective was already discussed in 2022 in the LUMEN journal itself (Clero, 2022). However it is not at all a question of repeating what was already said nearly three years ago. A few words are necessary for the reader who is not already familiar with this article and even for a reader who may have read it some time ago. Let us reassure the reader from the outset, however: this knowledge is not essential to read this article. But we must provide some clarifications. The experiment we are interested in is not entirely new. It had already taken place in France in around twenty hospitals that have an intensive care unit and there are reports of it in the medical literature, which echo the words of patients who have come out of it rather well (Clero, 2022). Psychiatry had also already encouraged the patient to keep a logbook, of which only he-and perhaps his psychiatrist- was aware. But this is where we almost immediately encounter the difference between the structure of these notebooks initiated by B. Misset and the previous structure (essentially used in psychiatry or neuro-psychiatry): unlike what happens most of the time in psychiatry, the intensive care patient, often being artificially put to sleep to be able to tolerate the care, is not capable of keeping a logbook for himself.
References
Apollinaire, G. (1921). Alcools. NRF Gallimard
Butor, M. (1957). La Modification. Les Éditions de Minuit.
Cléro J.-P. (2025). « L’intérêt éthique d’une réflexion sur l’animal » . In C. Hervé, C. Stoecklé (eds.). Conference of November 17 and 18, 2025. The text will be published in Éthique biomédicale et normes juridiques under the heading Vers une politique de la santé publique ? (Lefebvre Dalloz, 2026).
Cléro J.-P. (in press). Pascal intempestif jusque dans ses mathématiques; jeux de langage dans quelques raisonnements pascaliens, in C. Tiercelin, L. Plazenet (eds.). Pascal intempestif, Actes du Colloque du Collège de France d’octobre 2023, Classiques Garnier, p. 185-219.
Clero, J.-P. (2022). “If I Were Told the Experience of Medical and Surgical Resuscitation.” The Resuscitation Notebooks of Benoît Misset. The Ethical Powers of Writing. Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty: Philosophy & Humanistic Sciences, 10(2), 01-40. https://doi.org/10.18662/lumenphs/10.2/67
Cléro, J.-P., (2000). Théorie de la perception. PUF
Cléro, J.-P., (2020). Lacan and the English Language. Agincourt Press
Cléro, J.-P., (2023). I metodi di Pascal. Una matematica di traduzione tra retorica e macchina, Nuova lettera matematica 3, 96-127.
Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. Routledge,
Eliade, M. (1965). Le sacré et le profane, Gallimard.
Harsanyi, J. (2022). L’éthique et le comportement rationnel, Hermann.
Hirschman, A. O. (1977). Passions and interests, political arguments for capitalism before its triumph. Princeton University Press.
Maupertuis, P.L. (2010). Essai de philosophie morale, éd. Jean-Max Liandier, Paris, L’Harmattan, coll. «Philosophie Sciences et techniques ».
Montaigne M. de (1967), Œuvres complètes, Essais, L.I, Chap. XX, Bibliothèque de la Pléiade, NRF.
Pascal, B. (1995). Pensées. Penguin
Rousseau, J. J. (2016). The social contract. In Democracy: a reader (pp. 43-51). Columbia University Press.
Sartre, J.-P. (1943). L’être et le néant. Gallimard.
Shakespeare, W. (2023). Hamlet. Flammarion.
Spinoza, B. (1913). Éthique (2nd vol.). Appuhn, Garnier.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The Authors & InManifest Network

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
LUMEN PHS Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND