The Myth of Technology and The Risks of Desecration in Digital Media Communication


  • Marius Cucu PhD Lecturer, Ștefan cel Mare University, Suceava, Romania
  • Oana Lenta PhD Associate Lecturer, Ştefan cel Mare University, Suceava, Romania



Technique, digital communication, myth, modernity, progress, involution, sacred spirit, profane


To what extent is the contemporary world still aware of the risks of excessive technologicalization? Does the warning of the ancient Greeks who announced, through the Promethean and age myth, the danger of detachment from sacredness and the fatality of man's damnation to his own annihilation under the mirage of unbridled exploitation of nature still reach us? Is it still possible to re-evaluate the progress of modern man, in his negative, destructive aspects? Are not we currently witnessing, in the age of digital communication, the distancing of the human being from his own existential-spiritual foundations by assuming a model of machinal Super-man, technical in the operations of the mind but also of affectivity? Perhaps a reconsideration of the ontological and gnoseological position of modern man, anchored in the age of high-tech constructions and digital communications, could be inaugurated starting from the reinterpretation of the mythical-symbolic warnings of ancient meditation.


Afloroaei, Ş. (1994). Lumea ca reprezentare a celuilalt [The world as a representation of the other]. Institutul European.

Berdiaev, N. (1999). Încercare de metafizică eshatologică [Attempt at an eschatological metaphysics]. Paideia.

Blaj, E. C. (2016). Etică şi cibernetică [Ethics and cybernetics]. [Doctoral Dissertation]. “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University from Iaşi, Romania.

Cioran, E. (2002). Căderea în timp [Falling in time]. Humanitas.

Eliade, M. (2000). Istoria credinţelor şi ideilor religioase [History of religious beliefs and ideas] (1st vol.). Univers Enciclopedic.

Engels, F. (1964). Anti-Dühring. In K. Marx & F. Engels, Opere [Works], (20th vol.). Political.

Floridi, L. (2009). Infosfera. Etica e filosofia nell'età dell'informazione [Infosphere. Ethics and philosophy in the information age]. G. Giappichelli Editore.

Frunză, S. (2017). Looking at personal development and the American dream as possible solutions to overcome the European identity crisis and the European nightmare. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies, 16(48), 125-140.

Frunză, S. (2019). Human condition and the sacred in the digital era. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies, 18(52), 156-169.

Heidegger, M. (1995). Originea operei de artă [The origin of the work of art]. Humanitas.

Heidegger, M. (2003). Fiinţă şi timp [Being and time]. Humanitas.

Jung, C. G. (2011). Civilizaţia în tranziţie [Civilization in transition]. Trei.

Marx, K. (1966). Capitalul. Criza economiei politice. Cartea I. Procesul de producţie a capitalului [Capital. A critique of political economy. Book I. The process of capitalist production]. In K. Marx & F. Engels, Opere [Works] (23rd vol.). Politică.

Nietzsche, F. (1999). Voinţa de putere [The will to power]. Aion.

Ninenko, I. (2017). Neuro sync: Inventing data-enhanced communication in Russia. The Russian Journal of Communication, 9(3), 278–286.

Odorčák, J. (2019). Exorganic posthumanism and brain-computer interface technologies. Postmodern Openings, 10(4), 193-208.

Odorčák, J. (2020). Scientific immortalism and the problematic future of technocentric immortality. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies, 19(55), 53-68.

Presură, C. (2019). Fizica povestită [Narrated physics]. Humanitas.

Sandu, A. (2015). The anthropology of immortality and the crisis of posthuman conscience. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies, 40, 3-26

Sandu, A., & Vlad, L. (2018). Beyond technological singularity - The posthuman condition. Postmodern Openings, 9(1), 91-102.




How to Cite

Cucu, M., & Lenta, O. (2020). The Myth of Technology and The Risks of Desecration in Digital Media Communication. Postmodern Openings, 11(4), 183-192.



Theoretical articles