The System of Media Critics in the Journalistic Environment in Postmodern Conditions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/po/12.1/251Keywords:
media, critics journalism, journalistic, postmodern, systemAbstract
Media criticism is an area of modern journalism that provides critical cognition and assessment of socially significant, relevant aspects of information production in the media. Media criticism studies and evaluates the mobile complex of the diverse relationships of the print and electronic press with the media audience and society as a whole, contributes to the introduction of social and professional adjustments to the activities of the print and electronic press. Modern media criticism covers not only aspects of the functioning of the print and electronic press related to journalism, the activities of journalistic groups and editorial policies, but also invades a wide range of problems, the formulation of which involves the study and evaluation of media content, the relationship of the media and their audience, the media and society as a whole. Today in the space of the Internet the most effective mass criticism of the media. Authors of media criticism blogs set as their main task the recording and analysis of materials that do not meet accepted journalistic standards and have poor quality and ethically dubious content. Media criticism blogs in new media are becoming a platform for discussion, where the problems of the influence of the media on society and the role of the media in this society are discussed.
References
Allern, S. (2017). Journalism as a Public Good: A Scandinavian Perspective. Journalism. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/1464884917730945.
Bakanov, R. (2019). Mediakritika v usloviyakh transformatsii rossiyskoy zhurnalistiki [Media criticism in the conditions of transformations of Russian journalism]. Journalism of the post-Soviet republics: 20 years later. Sat Proceedings of the Intern. scientific-practical conf. Belgorod: CONSTANT, 100 —109. URL: https://kpfu.ru/pec_print?p_id=21583&p_lang=2
Borden, S. L. (2012). Press Apologias: A New Paradigm for the New Transparency? Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 27(1): 15-30. doi: 10.1080/08900523.2012.636246.
Coombs, T. (2010). Parameters for Crisis Communication. In Coombs, T. & Holladay, S/ (eds.) Handbook of Crisis Communication (pp. 17-53). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Deuze, M. (2007). What is multimedia journalism. Journalism Studies, 5, 139-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670042000211131
Fornas, J. (2013). The Dialectics of Communicative and Immanent Critique in Cultural Studies. TripleC (Cognition, Communication, Co-Operation): Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 11(2): 504-514. URL: https://www.triple-c.at/index.php/tripleC/article/view/504
Fuchs, C. (2010). Alternative Media as Critical Media. European Journal of Social Theory, 13(2), 173–192. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1368431010362294
Gnedash, A. (2020). Konstruktivnyye i destruktivnyye sotsial'no-politicheskiye praktiki v onlayn-prostranstve sovremennoy Rossii: «neudachi», «keysy», «mekhanika» [Constructive and destructive socio-political practices in the online space of modern Russia: “fails”, “cases”, “mechanics”]. Man. Community. Control, 2, 40−54. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/konstruktivnye-i-destruktivnye-sotsialno-politicheskie-praktiki-v-online-prostranstve-sovremennoy-rossii-feyly-keysy-mehaniki
Hasanov, N. (2017). Mozhlyvosti hromadyansʹkoyi zhurnalistyky v novykh ZMI u vyrishenni sotsialʹnykh problem [Possibilities of citizen journalism in new media in solving social problems]. MediaScope. Issue. Access mode: http://www.mediascope.ru/2261.
Hindman, E. B. (2003). The Princess and the Paparazzi: Blame, Responsibility, and the Media’s Role in the Death of Diana. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 80(3): 666-688. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/241655643_The_Princess_and_the_Paparazzi_Blame_Responsibility_and_the_Media's_Role_in_the_Death_of_Diana
Kachkaeva, A.G. (2020) Zhurnalistyka ta konverhentsiya: chomu i yak tradytsiyni ZMI peretvoryuyutʹsya na mulʹtymedia [Journalism and convergence: why and how traditional media turn into multimedia]. Mos-Publishing House: 200 p. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342732496_New_Media_Business_Philosophy_in_Conditions_of_Mass_Media_Convergence
Karjakina, K. (2020). Aktualʹni formy ta modeli novykh media: vid rozuminnya audytoriyeyu do stvorennya kontentu [Actual forms and models of new media: from audience understanding to content creation]. mediascope.ru: Media research portal. URL: http://mediascope.ru/node/524.
Karpenko, I. (2018). Konverhentsiya v ZMI: ponyattya ta vydy [Convergence in the media: concept and types]. Scientific statements of BelSU. Series Humanities, 13(156), 18 - 190 – 19 URL: http://dspace.bsu.edu.ru/handle/123456789/11887
Korochensky, A.P. (2019). Regulyatornaya rol' mediakritiki Samoregulirovaniye zhurnalistskogo soobshchestva. Opyt. Problemy [Regulatory role of media criticismSelf-regulation of the journalistic community. Experience. Problems]. Prospects for becoming in Russia. 3rd ed., Stereotype. M .: Galeria, 211 p. URL: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=sbFxUMEAAAAJ&hl=ru
Korochensky, A. P. (2018.) Mediakrytyka v teoriyi ta praktytsi zhurnalistyky [Media criticism in the theory and practice of journalism]: author. dis. Dr. filol. Sciences: 10.01.10. Baikal State University. St. Petersburg, 40 p. URL: http://jq.bgu.ru/reader/article.aspx?id=22216
Olsson, E.-K., Nord, L.W., & Falkheimer, J. (2015). Media Coverage Crisis Exploitation Characteristics: A Case Comparison Study. Journal of Public Relations Research, 27, 158-174. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273580260_Media_Coverage_Crisis_Exploitation_Characteristics_A_Case_Comparison_Study
Picard, R. (2010). A business perspective on challenges facing journalism. In: Levy, DA, Nielsen, RK (eds) The Changing Business of Journalism and Its Implications for Democracy. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, 11(1), 17–24. http://hj.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A392522&dswid=-7075
Vartanova, E. (2019). Do choho pryzvodytʹ konverhentsiya ZMI [What does media convergence lead to]. Information Society Issue, 5, 11–14. http://emag.iis.ru/arc/infosoc/emag.nsf/BPAEng/b59df6463a315de4c32568fd0038da32
White, R. (2000). New Approaches to Media Ethics: Moral Dialogue, Creating Normative Para-digms and Public Cultural Truth. In B. Pattyn (ed), Media Ethics: Opening Social Dialogue, Leu- ven, Peeters, (pp 47-67). BTP-Art publishing house.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Postmodern Openings Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND
