Readiness to Online Learning: To Be A Smart University

Authors

  • Fahriye Altinay Near East University, Nicosia, Graduate School of Educational Sciences
  • Gokmen Dagli University of Kyrenia, Near East University
  • Zehra Altinay Near East University
  • Mehmet Altinay University of Kyrenia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/12.1sup2/241

Keywords:

accessibility, online learning, services, smart university, roles, quality

Abstract

Accessibility, inclusiveness, diversity play a great role to promote smart society in terms of equality for every citizen. Todays’ crises, is defined as pandemic times and therefore adaptions of education systems to make diversity and connectivity is essential. In this respect, challenges of adaptation to the relevant society tools and barriers of involving online learning were considered in this research study. This research study aims to evaluate the readiness to online learning and barriers of adaptation process in reaching out being smart society.  Qualitative research was employed in this research and online interview forms were conducted to get data from 10 academicians and 5 head of departments as research participants. Thematic analysis was used to analyse data. Research results revealed that academicians are aware of accessible services and applications to being smart university through online education tools for the quality but still there is much to do in applications. In addition, establishing strategies and policies for the smart university and services are intensified need for the learners in terms of managerial and instructional skills. Barriers in online learning and roles of instructors, managers were revealed.

References

Altinay, F., Altinay, M., Dagli, G., & Altınay, Z. (2018). Being leader in global citizenship at the information technology age. Qual Quant 52(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0585-5

Anez, V. F., Güell, J. M., & Giffinger, R. (2018). Smart City implementation and discourses: An integrated conceptual model. The case of Vienna. Cities, 78, 4-16.

Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. California: Sage.

Hegarty, B. (2015). Attributes of Open Pedagogy: A Model for Using Open Educational Resources. July-August. Educational Technology, 55(4), 3-13.

Kaplan, A. M, & Haenlein, M. (2016).Higher education and the digital revolution: About MOOCs, SPOCs, social media, and the Cookie Monster. Business Horizons, 59(4), 441-450, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2016.03.008

Neirotti, P., De Marco, A., Cagliano, A.C., Mangano, G., & Scorrano, F. (2014). Current trends in Smart City initiatives: Some stylised facts. Cities, 38, 25-36.

Maor, D. (2003). The Teacher's Role in Developing Interaction and Reflection in an Online Learning Community. Educational Media International, 40(1-2), 127-138. https://doi.org/10.1080/0952398032000092170

Ossiannilsson. (2018). Increasing access, social inclusion, and quality through mobile learning. International Journal of Advanced Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, 10(4), 29-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/IJAPUC.2018100103

Sozudogru, O., Altinay, M., Dagli, G., Altinay, Z., & Altinay, F. (2019) Examination of connectivist theory in English language learning: The role of online social networking tool. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 36(4), https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-02-2019-0018

UNESCO. (2019). Leading education 2030. Retrieved from https://en.unesco.org/education2030-sdg4

Downloads

Published

2020-06-02

How to Cite

Altinay, F., Dagli, G., Altinay, Z., & Altinay, M. (2020). Readiness to Online Learning: To Be A Smart University. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 12(1Sup2), 09-14. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/12.1sup2/241