Video Conferencing Integration: Challenges and Opportunities at Universities

Authors

  • Nataliya Mukan Lviv Polytechnic National University
  • Yuliana Lavrysh National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute"

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/12.1sup2/253

Keywords:

video conferencing, assessment, class management, flipped classes, interaction.

Abstract

As teachers who experience challenges with delivering classes online and finding relevant ways to teach students, we suggest our practical recommendations on video conferencing tools integration at universities. This synchronous online tool is an efficient method of class delivery that provides practicing four key language skills, maintaining communication and facilitating digital competence development. The study involved 34 teachers from two universities to share the experience, expectations, and perception of the technology. Having analyzed the results of questionnaires, we worked out a strategy on the successful implementation of the technology in the teaching process. Among the main challenges, teachers indicated class management, educational materials transformation for the online mode, working with mixability groups of students, and assessment. We found out that supplementation of asynchronous online tool might add interactivity to lessons or find a way to assess students, knowledge of the technology tools helps with class management, and possibilities to personalize tasks through the chat, breakout rooms, and partial screen sharing help manage with mixability groups.

Author Biographies

Nataliya Mukan, Lviv Polytechnic National University

Department of Pedagogy and Innovative Education Sc.D. (Education), Professor

Yuliana Lavrysh, National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute"

Ph.D. in Education, Associate Professor,  Department of English for Engineering

References

Drexhage, J., Leiss, D., Torben S., & Timo. E. (2016). The Connected Classroom – Using Video Conferencing Technology to Enhance Teacher Training. Reflecting Education, 10, 70-88.

Fischer, A. J., Collier-Meek, M. A., Bloomfield, B., Erchul, W. P., & Gresham, F. M. (2017). A comparison of problem identification interviews conducted face-to-face and via videoconferencing using the consultation analysis record. Journal School Psychology, 63, 63-76

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education model. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105.

Hwee, L. (2007). Community of Inquiry in an Online Undergraduate Information Technology Course. JITE, 6, 153-168.

Kent, A. M., & Simpson, J. L. (2010). Interactive Videoconferencing: Connecting Theory to Practice for Pre-service Teachers. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 27(1), 12-21.

Lavrysh, Y. (2016). Peer and self-assessment at ESP classes: case study. Advanced education, 6, 60-68.

Reaburn, P., & McDonald, J. (2017). Creating and Facilitating Communities of Practice in Higher Education: In McDonald, Cater-Steel (Eds). Communities of Practice (pp. 121-150). Singapore: Springer.

Tabak, F., & Rampal, R. (2014). Synchronous e-learning: reflections and design considerations. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 10(4), 8-22.

Downloads

Published

2020-06-02

How to Cite

Mukan, N., & Lavrysh, Y. (2020). Video Conferencing Integration: Challenges and Opportunities at Universities. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 12(1Sup2), 108-114. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/12.1sup2/253