Unpacking the Physical Education Lesson: A Thematic Analysis

Authors

  • Bogdan Sorin Olaru “Dunărea de Jos” University of Galati, Romania
  • Gabriel-Laurentiu Talaghir “Dunărea de Jos” University of Galati, Romania
  • Teodora Mihaela Iconomescu “Dunărea de Jos” University of Galati, Romania
  • Cristian Mihail Rus “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University of Iaşi, Romania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/17.4/1079

Keywords:

physical education, teachers, physical activity, pedagogy, curriculum, thematic analysis

Abstract

The Physical Education (PE) lesson is regarded by many experts as an essential tool for combating sedentary lifestyles. However, to fully harness the potential of this tool, it is crucial to carefully consider the ideas we communicate to future PE teachers. Aim: This study aims to explore the main concepts conveyed to future PE teachers in Romania. Method: A thematic qualitative analysis was conducted on the mandatory bibliographic references assigned to prospective PE teachers in Romania’s public education system. Results and Discussion: Of the 21 required study documents, 13 (62%) could not be found. A thematic analysis of the remaining 8 materials revealed 5 main themes and 10 sub-themes. One key message imparted to teachers is that sports competition serves as the primary educational tool in PE lessons, and teachers are responsible for identifying talent for high-performance sports. Conclusions and Future Implications: This study highlights the outdated ideas we pass on to future PE teachers. If we want a physically literate young generation, it is imperative to revise the specialized literature required for future PE teachers.

References

Bădău, D., Bădău, A., Trâmbițaș, C., Trâmbițaș-Miron, D., Moraru, R., Stan, A. A., Oancea, B. M., Turcu, I., Grosu, E. F., Grosu, V. T., Daina, L. G., Daina, C. M., Suteu, C. L., & Moraru, L. (2021). Differences between active and semi-active students regarding the parameters of body composition using bioimpedance and magnetic bioresonance technologies. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(15), 7906. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18157906

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2023). Toward good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and be(com)ing a knowing researcher. International Journal of Transgender Health, 24(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2022.2129597

Cale, L., & Harris, J. (2018). The role of knowledge and understanding in fostering physical literacy. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 37(3), 280–287. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2018-0134

Carl, J., Goss, H., Lundvall, S., Pavlova, I., Algurén, B., Antala, B., … Salin, K. (2025). Compatibility of physical education curricula with physical literacy across 40 European countries. Journal of Curriculum Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2025.2523436

Cârstea, G. (2000). Teoria și metodica educației fizice și sportului. AN-DA.

Castelli, D. M., & Valley, J. A. (2007). The relationship of physical fitness and motor competence to physical activity. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 26(4), 358–374. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.26.4.358

Corbin, C. B. (2021). Conceptual physical education: A course for the future. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 10(3), 308–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2020.10.004

Dragnea, A., & Teodorescu, S. (2002). Teoria educației fizice și sportului. Editura FEST.

Dragnea, A., Bota, A., Teodorescu, S., Stănescu, M., Șerbănoiu, S., & Tudor, V. (2006). Educație fizică – teorie și didactică. FEST.

Dunning, E., & Sheard, K. (2005). Barbarians, gentlemen and players: A sociological study of the development of rugby football (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Elo, S., Kääriäinen, M., Kanste, O., Pölkki, T., Utriainen, K., & Kyngäs, H. (2014). Qualitative content analysis. SAGE Open, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014522633

Gulick, L. (1899). Psychological, pedagogical, and religious aspects of group games. Pedagogical Seminary, 6(2), 135–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/08919402.1899.10532960

Iconomescu, T. M., Olaru, B. S., Talaghir, L. G., Mereuță, C., Bălint, G., Buhociu, M. F., & Dorgan, V. (2021b). Interventions which aim at implementing the knowledge-based approach in the PE lesson: A systematic review. Sustainability, 13(21), 11781. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111781

Iconomescu, T. M., Olaru, B. S., Talaghir, L.-G., Berdilă, A., & Rus, C.-M. (2021a, November 12). Guidelines for the physical education and sport lesson in Romania. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference of the Universitaria Consortium in Physical Education, Sports and Physical Therapy.

International Physical Literacy Association. (2017). IPLA’s home page. https://www.physical-literacy.org.uk/about/

Jackson, A. S. (2006). The evolution and validity of health-related fitness. Quest, 58(1), 160–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2006.10491877

Johannes, C., Bryant, A. S., Edwards, L. C., Bartle, G., Birch, J. E., Christodoulides, E., Emeljanovas, A., … Elsborg, P. (2023). Physical literacy in Europe: The current state of implementation in research, practice, and policy. Journal of Exercise Science and Fitness, 21(1), 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesf.2022.12.003

Keegan, R. J., Barnett, L. M., Dudley, D. A., Telford, R. D., Lubans, D. R., Bryant, A. S., Roberts, W. M., Morgan, P. J., Schranz, N. K., Weissensteiner, J. R., Vella, S. A., Salmon, J., Ziviani, J., Okely, A. D., Wainwright, N., & Evans, J. R. (2019). Defining physical literacy for application in Australia: A modified Delphi method. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 38(2), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2018-0264

Kirk, D., & Gorely, T. (2000). Challenging thinking about the relationship between school physical education and sport performance. European Physical Education Review, 6(2), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336x000062002

Macdonald, D. (2011). Like a fish in water: Physical education policy and practice in the era of neoliberal globalization. Quest, 63(1), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2011.10483661

Mierzwinski, M., Cock, S., & Velija, P. (2019). A position statement on social justice, physical education, and bullying: A figurational sociological perspective. Quest, 71(2), 215–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2018.1551807

Ministerul Educatiei Tineretului si Sportului/ METS (2010). Anexa nr.2 la OMECTS nr. 5620/11.11.2010. Concurs pentru ocuparea posturilor didactice/catedrelor declarate vacante/rezervate în învățământul preuniversitar. Monitorul Oficial nr. 872 bis din 28 decembrie 2010. https://legislatie.just.ro/Public/DetaliiDocument/131721

Payne, G., & Morrow, J. R. (2009). School physical education as a viable change agent to increase youth physical activity. The President’s Council on Physical Fitness and Sports Research Digest, 10(2).

Șerbănoiu, S. (2004). Metodica educației fizice. Cartea Universitară.

Singer, R. N., & Dick, W. (1980). Teaching physical education: A systems approach (2nd ed.). Houghton Mifflin.

Society of Health and Physical Educators. (2020). Is it physical education or physical activity? https://www.shapeamerica.org/publications/resources/teachingtools/qualitype/pa_vs_pe.aspx

Sum, K. W. R., Li, M. H., Choi, S. M., Huang, Y., & Ma, R. S. (2020). In/visible physical education and the public health agenda of physical literacy development in Hong Kong. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(9), 3304. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093304

Talaghir, L. G., Olaru, B., & Iconomescu, T. M. (2021a). The teachers’ approach to the theoretical knowledge taught in online physical education classes during the Covid-19 pandemic. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 13(4), 31-42. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/13.4/469

Talaghir, L. G., Olaru, B., Iconomescu, T. M., & Rus, M. C. (2021b). Study on the implementation of theoretical notions in the online PE lesson during the COVID-19 pandemic. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 12(4), 411-422. https://www.edusoft.ro/brain/index.php/brain/article/view/1206

Talaghir, L. G., Olaru, B. S., Mereuță, C., Cantez, K., Rus, C. M., & Iconomescu, T. M. (2023). Study on PE teachers' perception regarding the theoretical component of the PE lesson. Revista Românească pentru Educație Multidimensională, 15(4), 339–350. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/15.4/797

Tremblay, M. S., Costas-Bradstreet, C., Barnes, J. D., Bartlett, B., Dampier, D., Lalonde, C., Leidl, R., Longmuir, P., McKee, M., Patton, R., Way, R., & Yessis, J. (2018). Canada’s physical literacy consensus statement: Process and outcome. BMC Public Health, 18(Suppl 2). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5903-x

UNESCO. (2015). Quality physical education (QPE): Guidelines for policy makers (1st ed.). UNESCO Publishing.

Vertinsky, P. A. (1992). Reclaiming space, revisioning the body: The quest for gender-sensitive physical education. Quest, 44(3), 373–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.1992.10484063

Whitehead, M. (2001). The concept of physical literacy. European Journal of Physical Education, 6(2), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/1740898010060205

Whitehead, M. (2020). Learner-centred teaching: A physical literacy approach. In S. Capel & M. Whitehead (Eds.), Learning to teach physical education in secondary school (5th ed.). Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-18

How to Cite

Olaru, B. S., Talaghir, G.-L., Iconomescu, T. M., & Rus, C. M. (2025). Unpacking the Physical Education Lesson: A Thematic Analysis. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 17(4), 799-818. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/17.4/1079

Issue

Vol. 17 No. 4 (2025): Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala

Section

Education, Sport and Health

License

Copyright (c) 2025 The Authors & InManifest Network

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant this journalright of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND

CC_BY_NC_ND