Managing Risk Behaviour in Schools: New Trends in Prevention and Educational Practice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/17.4/1068Keywords:
risk behavior, prevention, school environment, digital addictions, cyberbullying, mental health, psychological resilienceAbstract
This study explores the changing manifestations of risk behaviour among secondary school students, with a focus on the growing impact of digital addictions and cyberbullying alongside more familiar patterns such as substance use, aggression, and truancy. These forms of behaviour influence school climate, academic performance, and mental health, making prevention a pressing concern for educators and policymakers. The research draws on a qualitative design that integrates interviews, classroom observation, group discussions, and a case study, analysed through grounded theory and interpretative phenomenological approaches. The findings suggest that preventive strategies are effective only when embedded in the broader culture of the school, supported by trained staff, reinforced through cooperation with families, and linked to external expertise. Particular attention is needed in strengthening media literacy, enhancing psychological resilience, and sustaining preventive work within class groups. The study highlights the importance of systematic evaluation and positions prevention as an essential part of educational policy rather than a set of fragmented initiatives. In doing so, it contributes original insight into the relatively underexplored field of secondary education and offers guidance for more inclusive and responsive approaches to prevention.
References
Acker, R. V., & Wehby, J. H. (2000). Exploring the social contexts influencing student success or failure: Introduction. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 44(3), 93–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10459880009599789
Alase, A. (2017). The interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA): A guide to a good qualitative research approach. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 5(2), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.5n.2p.9
Baum, F., MacDougall, C., & Smith, D. (2006). Participatory action research. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 60(10), 854–857. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2004.028662
Biggerstaff, D., & Thompson, A. R. (2008). Interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA): A qualitative methodology of choice in healthcare research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 5(3), 214–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780880802314304
Chappell, A. (2007). Using teaching observations and reflective practice to challenge conventions and conceptions of teaching in geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 31(2), 257–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260601063651
Charmaz, K., & Thornberg, R. (2021). The pursuit of quality in grounded theory. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 305–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1780357
Cockerham, D. (2024). Participatory action research: Building understanding, dialogue, and positive actions in a changing digital environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72(5), 2763–2791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10294-1
Cornish, F., Breton, N., Moreno-Tabarez, U., Delgado, J., Rua, M., de-Graft Aikins, A., & Hodgetts, D. (2023). Participatory action research. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 3(1), Article 34. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-023-00214-1
Crowe, S., Cresswell, K., Robertson, A., Huby, G., Avery, A., & Sheikh, A. (2011). The case study approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11(1), 100. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-100
Daněk, A. (2024). The issue of extraordinary talent in the residential childcare institution: Giftedness or dual exceptionality? Pedagogika-Pedagogy, 96(9), 1297–1307. https://doi.org/10.53656/ped2024-9.09
Daněk, A., Šotolová, E., & Stárek, L. (2024). The effect of alcoholism on the destruction of relationship values. AD ALTA: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 14(1), 212–216. https://doi.org/10.33543/j.1401.21 2216
Daněk, A., Šotolová, E., & Žolnová, J. (2023). Czech and Slovak systems of institutional care: Different approaches, common goals. AD ALTA: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 13(2), 50–54. https://doi.org/10.33543/j.1203.5054
Demirci, J. R. (2024). About Research: Conducting better qualitative interviews. Journal of Human Lactation, 40(1), 21–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/08903344231213651
Ding, K., & Li, H. (2023). Digital addiction intervention for children and adolescents: A scoping review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(6), 4777. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20064777
Dolejš, M., & Orel, M. (2017). Rizikové chování u adolescentů a impulzivita jako prediktor tohoto chování (1st ed.). Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci. https://doi.org/10.5507/ff.17.24452524
Dunwoodie, K., Macaulay, L., & Newman, A. (2023). Qualitative interviewing in the field of work and organisational psychology: Benefits, challenges and guidelines for researchers and reviewers. Applied Psychology, 72(2), 863–889. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12414
Emerson, E. (2001). Challenging behaviour: Analysis and intervention in people with severe intellectual disabilities (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511543739
Espedal, G. (2022). Research interviews to investigate and co-create values. In G. Espedal, B. Jelstad Løvaas, S. Sirris, & A. Wæraas (Eds.), Researching values (pp. 117–132). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90769-3_7
Fang, Y., Luo, X., & Lu, J. (2023). A review of research on the impact of the classroom physical environment on schoolchildren’s health. Journal of Building Engineering, 65, 105430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105430
Flicker, S. (2008). Who benefits from community-based participatory research? A case study of the positive youth project. Health Education & Behaviour, 35(1), 70–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198105285927
Hallworth, D. J. (2024). Deconstructing the problematisation of challenging behaviour in primary schools. EDUCATION 3-13, 52(3), 313–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2022.2089712
Hamilton, L., & Corbett-Whittier, C. (2013). Using case study in education research. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473913851
Hawkins, G. T., Chung, C. S., Hertz, M. F., & Antolin, N. (2023). The school environment and physical and social-emotional well-being: Implications for students and school employees. Journal of School Health, 93(9), 799–812. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.13375
Hibel, J., Farkas, G., & Morgan, P. L. (2010). Who is placed into special education? Sociology of Education, 83(4), 312–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040710383518
Hofmann, V., & Müller, C. M. (2022). Challenging behaviour in students with intellectual disabilities: The role of individual and classmates’ communication skills. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 66(6–7), 534–547. https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.12922
Jones, R., Kreppner, J., Marsh, F., & Hartwell, B. (2023). Punitive behaviour management policies and practices in secondary schools: A systematic review of children and young people’s perceptions and experiences. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 28(2–3), 182–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632752.2023.2255403
Kopecký, K., Szotkowski, R., & Krejčí, V. (2015). Rizikové formy chování českých a slovenských dětí v prostředí internetu (1st ed.). Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci. https://doi.org/10.5507/pdf.15.24448619
Maglio, F., & Pherali, T. (2020). Ethical reflections on children’s participation in educational research during humanitarian crises. Research Ethics, 16(1–2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016119898409
Makri, C., & Neely, A. (2021). Grounded theory: A guide for exploratory studies in management research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211013654
McGillicuddy, S. (2024). Responding to challenging behaviour in post-primary schools: Exploring a new authority. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 9, 100778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100778
McIntyre, A. (2008). Participatory action research. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483385679
Nicholls, G., Bailey, T., Grindle, C. F., & Hastings, R. P. (2022). Challenging behaviour and its risk factors in children and young people in a special school setting: A four wave longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 36(2), 366–373. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.13066
Nicholls, G., Hastings, R. P., & Grindle, C. F. (2020). Prevalence and correlates of challenging behaviour in children and young people in a special school setting. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 35(1), 40–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2019.1607659
Nunan, J. S. R. (2024). Primary school teachers’ experiences of learner challenging behaviour in mainstream classrooms in South Africa. Educational Practice and Theory, 46(2), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.7459/ept/460203
O’Brennan, L. M., Bradshaw, C. P., & Furlong, M. J. (2014). Influence of classroom and school climate on teacher perceptions of student problem behavior. School Mental Health, 6(2), 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-014-9118-8
Patnaik, S., Sharma, U., & Subban, P. (2022). Who is responsible for students’ challenging behaviour? A study of the causal attributions of teachers to challenging behaviour in primary schools in West Bengal, India. Disabilities, 2(1), 56–72. https://doi.org/10.3390/disabilities2010005
Pervez, A., & Galea, E. (2024). Primary schools: Spaces for children’s social and emotional learning. Psychology of Education Review, 48(1), 68–76. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsper.2024.48.1.68
Racz, S. J., O’Brennan, L. M., Bradshaw, C. P., & Leaf, P. J. (2016). The influence of family and teacher factors on early disruptive school behaviors: A latent profile transition analysis. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 24(2), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426615599541
Rajasinghe, D. (2020). Interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) as a coaching research methodology. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 13(2), 176–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/17521882.2019.1694554
Royston, R., Absoud, M., Ambler, G., Barnes, J., Hunter, R., Kyriakopoulos, M., Ondrušková, T., Oulton, K., Paliokosta, E., Panca, M., Sharma, A., Slonim, V., Summerson, U., Sutcliffe, A., Thomas, M., Qu, C., & Hassiotis, A. (2024). Evaluation of adapted parent training for challenging behaviour in pre-school children with intellectual developmental disabilities: A randomised controlled trial. PLoS ONE, 19(3), e0306182. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306182
Shamrova, D. P., & Cummings, C. E. (2017). Participatory action research (PAR) with children and youth: An integrative review of methodology and PAR outcomes for participants, organisations, and communities. Children and Youth Services Review, 81, 400–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.08.022
Stanforth, A., & Rose, J. (2020). ‘You kind of don’t want them in the room’: Tensions in the discourse of inclusion and exclusion for students displaying challenging behaviour in an English secondary school. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 24(12), 1253–1267. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1516821
Sun, R. C. F., & Shek, D. T. L. (2012). Student classroom misbehavior: An exploratory study based on teachers’ perceptions. The Scientific World Journal, 2012, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1100/2012/208907
Thomas, D. E., & Bierman, K. L. (2006). The impact of classroom aggression on the development of aggressive behavior problems in children. Development and Psychopathology, 18(02). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579406060251
Van Manen, M. (2018). Phenomenology of practice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315422657
Zahr, F. S. (2022). Junior high school novice teachers’ self-efficacy in managing students’ challenging behaviour in Indonesia. KnE Social Sciences, 7(4), 363–375. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i4.10515
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The Authors & InManifest Network
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journalright of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND
