Exploring Sustainability in Science Education: A Bibliometric Analysis of Web of Science (WoS) Data

Authors

  • Ilgım Özergun-Köse Mathematics and Science Education Department, Faculty of Education, Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Canakkale,Turkey
  • Selen Beyazbal Curriculum and Instruction Department, Faculty of Education, Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Canakkale,Turkey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/17.4/1074

Keywords:

sustainability, science education, bibliometric analysis

Abstract

This bibliometric analysis study aims to identify, analyze, and discuss the current trends and thematic structures within the literature of sustainability in science education indexed in Web of Science (WoS) database from the first mention of the term through mid-2025. Therefore, the study focuses on a comprehensive bibliometric analysis and offers a discipline-specific systematic mapping of publication trends, influential scholars, and thematic structures in science education research. A total of 154 peer-reviewed articles were analyzed through three-stage process combining descriptive, network-based, and qualitative thematic analysis. First, descriptive bibliometric indicators which include publication trends by year, journal- and country-level distributions, and the most cited studies and authors were examined. Findings revealed a consistent upward trajectory in publication activity since 2007, with a sharp acceleration after 2018. It reflects the influence of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) on research agendas. The Sustainability journal emerged as the most leading journal, while the United States and Germany in country categorization led in national contributions. Second, keyword co-occurrence and thematic analyses highlighted core conceptual clusters centered on sustainability, climate change, biodiversity, and citizen science, as well as methodological strands focusing on program development, pedagogical approaches, and technological applications. Third, the categorization of publication types showed that the field is equally shaped by implementation-based interventions and review studies, while research on teachers and teacher candidates remains underrepresented. This study provides a field-specific synthesis of how sustainability has evolved within science education research and underscores the need for broader database triangulation and deeper theoretical engagement in future research.

References

Alsop, S., & Bencze, L. (2014). Activism! Toward a more radical science and technology education. In Activist science and technology education (pp. 1-19). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4360-11

Aikens, K., McKenzie, M., & Vaughter, P. (2018). Environmental and sustainability education policy research: A systematic review of methodological and thematic trends. Environmental and Sustainability Education Policy, 265-292. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203732359-17

Benner, A. D., Thornton, A., & Crosnoe, R. (2017). Children’s exposure to sustainability practices during the transition from preschool into school and their learning and socioemotional development. Applied Developmental Science, 21(2), 121-134. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2016.1175946

Boeve-de Pauw, J., Gericke, N., Olsson, D., & Berglund, T. (2015). The effectiveness of education for sustainable development. Sustainability, 7(11), 15693-15717. https://doi.org/10.3390/su71115693

Burmeister, M., Rauch, F., & Eilks, I. (2012). Education for sustainable development (ESD) and chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13(2), 59-68. https://doi.org/10.1039/C1RP90060A

Derman, M. (2023). A bibliometric analysis of biodiversity education. Journal of Science Learning, 6(1), 34-37. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v6i1.50831

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

Dönmez, İ. (2024). Sustainability in educational research: Mapping the field with a bibliometric analysis. Sustainability, 16(13), 5541. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135541

Ellegaard, O., & Wallin, J. A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact?. Scientometrics, 105(3), 1809-1831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z

Feinstein, N. W., & Kirchgasler, K. L. (2015). Sustainability in science education? How the Next Generation Science Standards approach sustainability, and why it matters. Science Education, 99(1), 121-144. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21137

García-Vinuesa, A. (2024). Empowering secondary education teachers for sustainable climate action. Sustainability, 16(18), 7941. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16187941

Gayford, C. (1995). Science education and sustainability: a case‐study in discussion‐based learning. Research in Science & Technological Education, 13(2), 135-145. https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514950130203

Giovannoni, E., Fabietti, G. (2013). What is sustainability? A review of the concept and its applications. In: Busco, C., Frigo, M., Riccaboni, A., Quattrone, P. (eds) Integrated Reporting. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02168-32

Green, M., & Somerville, M. (2014). Sustainability education: researching practice in primary schools. Environmental Education Research, 21(6), 832–845. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2014.923382

Grund, J., & Brock, A. (2020). Education for sustainable development in Germany: Not just desired but also effective for transformative action. Sustainability, 12(7), 2838. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072838

Hallinger, P., & Nguyen, V. T. (2020). Mapping the landscape and structure of research on Education for sustainable development: A bibliometric review. Sustainability, 12(5), 1947. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051947

Imaduddin, M., & Eilks, I. (2024). A scoping review and bibliometric analysis of educational research on water literacy and water education. Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy, 42, 101833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scp.2024.101833

Li, B., & Eilks, I. (2021). A systematic review of the green and sustainable chemistry education research literature in mainland China. Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy, 21, 100446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scp.2021.100446

Linkwitz, M., & Eilks, I. (2022). An action research Teacher’s journey while integrating Green chemistry into the high school chemistry curriculum. Sustainability, 14(17), 10621. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710621

Lüsse, M., Brockhage, F., Beeken, M., & Pietzner, V. (2022). Citizen science and its potential for science education. International Journal of Science Education, 44(7), 1120-1142. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2067365

Malhotra, P. (2024). The rise of passive investing: a systematic literature review applying PRISMA framework. Journal of Capital Markets Studies, 8(1), 95-125. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCMS-12-2023-0046

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D.G., & The Prisma Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264-269. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

Mokos, M., Realdon, G., & Zubak Čižmek, I. (2020). How to increase ocean literacy for future Ocean sustainability? The influence of non-formal marine science education. Sustainability, 12(24), 10647. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410647

Pham, X. L., & Le, T. T. (2024). Bibliometric analysis and systematic review of research on expert finding: A PRISMA-guided approach. The International Arab Journal of Information Technology, 21(4). https://doi.org/10.34028/iajit/21/4/9

Rieckmann, M. (2018). Learning to transform the world: Key competencies in education for sustainable development. Issues and Trends in Education for Sustainable Development, 39(1), 39-59. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000261802.locale=en

Sadler, T. D. (2011). Situating socio-scientific issues in classrooms as a means of achieving goals of science education. In Sadler, T. (eds.). Socio-scientific Issues in the Classroom. Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education (vol 39, pp. 1-9). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1159-4_1

Shaby, N., Staus, N., Dierking, L. D., & Falk, J. H. (2021). Pathways of interest and participation: How STEM‐interested youth navigate a learning ecosystem. Science Education, 105(4), 628-652. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21621

Sterling, S. (2010). Learning for resilience, or the resilient learner? Towards a necessary reconciliation in a paradigm of sustainable education. Environmental Education Research, 16(5-6), 511-528. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2010.505427

Sterling, E. J., Pascua, P., Sigouin, A., Gazit, N., Mandle, L., Betley, E., & McCarter, J. (2020). Creating a space for place and multidimensional well-being: lessons learned from localizing the SDGs. Sustainability Science, 15(4), 1129-1147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00822-w

Stevenson, R. B., Lasen, M., Ferreira, J. A., & Davis, J. (2017). Approaches to embedding sustainability in teacher education: A synthesis of the literature. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 405-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.01.013

Summers, D., & Turner, R. (2011). Outside the green box: Embedding education for sustainable development through cooperative inquiry. Educational Action Research, 19(4), 453-468. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2011.625682

Tytler, R. (2012). Socio-scientific issues, sustainability and science education. Research in Science Education, 42(1), 155-163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9262-1

Trott, C. D., & Weinberg, A. E. (2020). Science education for sustainability: Strengthening children’s science engagement through climate change learning and action. Sustainability, 2(16), 6400. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166400

UNESCO (2017). Education for sustainable development goals: learning objectives. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000247444

Wang, C. Y., Tseng, Y. C., Lin, S. S., Liu, S. C., Reid, A., & Monroe, M. C. (2024). Addressing the climate emergency with educational approaches: a bibliometric analysis of climate change education scholarship. Environmental Education Research, 30(11), 1885-1912. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2024.2386443

Wals, A. E., & Jickling, B. (2002). "Sustainability" in higher education: From doublethink and newspeak to critical thinking and meaningful learning. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 3(3), 221-232. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676370210434688

Wilks, S. S. (2015). Elementary statistical analysis. Princeton University Press.

Zidny, R., Sjöström, J., & Wilks, I. (2020). A multi-perspective reflection on how indigenous knowledge and related ideas can improve science education for sustainability. Science & Education, 29(1), 145-185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00100-x

Zhu, J., & Liu, W. (2020). A tale of two databases: The use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers. Scientometrics, 123(1), 321-335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03387-8

Zoller, U. (2012). Science education for global sustainability: What is necessary for teaching, learning, and assessment strategies?. Journal of Chemical Education, 89(3), 297-300. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed300047v

Downloads

Published

2025-12-18

How to Cite

Özergun-Köse, I., & Beyazbal, S. (2025). Exploring Sustainability in Science Education: A Bibliometric Analysis of Web of Science (WoS) Data. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 17(4), 669-689. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/17.4/1074

Issue

Section

Reform, Change and Innovation in Education