Between Structure and Creativity – Romanian Kindergarten Teachers’ Professional Reasoning in Selecting Didactic Strategies

Authors

  • Maria Popa Teacher Training Department, “Lucian Blaga” University of Sibiu, Sibiu, Romania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/17.4/1051

Keywords:

early childhood education, teacher agency, reflective practice, creative pedagogical decision-making, grounded theory

Abstract

This qualitative study explores how kindergarten teachers make professional decisions when selecting didactic strategies in their daily classroom practice. Drawing on fifty semi-structured interviews with teachers, the research examines how educators navigate the balance between structured teaching methods—such as memorization, observation, and exercises—and creative, play-based approaches including storytelling, modelling, and artistic expression. Using a grounded theory approach, the analysis reveals that teachers’ choices are shaped by multiple interrelated factors: curriculum requirements, children’s developmental needs, the emotional climate of the group, and teachers’ personal beliefs about learning and play. Findings indicate that teachers engage in a dynamic process of reasoning that blends experience, intuition, and reflection to ensure both cognitive progress and creative freedom. The resulting conceptual model highlights the central role of professional judgment and flexibility in early childhood education, portraying teachers as reflective practitioners who continuously adapt their strategies to promote meaningful, holistic learning experiences for young children.

Author Biography

Maria Popa, Teacher Training Department, “Lucian Blaga” University of Sibiu, Sibiu, Romania

Maria Cristina Popa is a lecturer at Teacher Training Department, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Romania. Her academic work lies at the intersection of early childhood education, cultural identity, and innovative teaching methodologies. Her research explores how children construct identity in multicultural and acculturative contexts and how teachers can foster inclusion and well-being through reflective and evidence-based practices. In recent years, her focus has expanded toward digital and blended learning in mathematics education, educational robotics, and teacher preparation for future-ready competencies.

References

Biesta, G. (2012). The educational significance of the experience of resistance: Schooling and the dialogue between child and world. Other education, 1(1). https://orbilu.uni.lu/bitstream/10993/7847/1/148%20OA%20Other%20Education%202012%20Resistance%20paper%20BIESTA.pdf

Escamilla, I. M. (2021). Learning stories. YC Young Children, 76(2), 33-39. https://www.naeyc.org/resources/pubs/yc/summer2021/learning-stories

Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage.

Chen, J. J. (2023a). Reflecting on reflection among early childhood teachers: A study of reflection for, in, and on action intersecting with the technical, practical, and critical dimensions. Reflective Practice, 24(3), 324–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2023.2194624

Chen, J. J. (2023b). Pedagogical adaptability as an essential capacity: Reflective practice of applying theory to practice among first-year early childhood teachers during remote instruction. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 44(4), 382-399.

Craft, A. (2011). Creativity and education futures: Learning in a digital age. Trentham Books.

Cremin, T., & Chappell, K. (2021). Creative pedagogies: A systematic review. Research Papers in Education, 36, 299-331. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2019.1677757

Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2014). Resilient teachers, resilient schools: Building and sustaining quality in testing times. Routledge.

Guerrero, A. L., & Camargo-Abello, M. (2023). Teachers’ agency in the implementation of an early childhood education policy program in schools in Bogotá, Colombia. International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy, 17(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40723-023-00104-9

Guyton, C., & Hewitt, P. (2022). One teacher educator’s strategies for encouraging reflective practice. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1042693

Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (2017). Expertise, competence and adaptive expertise. In K. A. Ericsson et al. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 237–254). Cambridge University Press.

Jones, N. N., Fowler, A. T., & Adair, J. K. (2023). Assessing agency in learning contexts: A first, critical step to assessing children. Young Children, 78(1). https://www.naeyc.org/resources/pubs/yc/spring2023/assessing-agency

Larrivee, B. (2000). Transforming teaching practice: Becoming the critically reflective teacher. Reflective Practice, 1(3), 293–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/713693162

Pantić, N. (2015). Reconciling rigour and impact by collaborative research design: study of teacher agency. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 40(4), 329–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2015.1113250

Priestley, M., Biesta, G. J. J., & Robinson, S. (2015). Teacher agency: An ecological approach. Bloomsbury Academic.

Robertson, N., Bussey, K. A., & Morrissey, A.-M. (2023). “If we can’t advocate for ourselves, nobody else will”: Teacher agency during early childhood reform. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 48(4), 281-293. https://doi.org/10.1177/18369391231208731

Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.

Siraj-Blatchford, I., Sylva, K., Muttock, S., Gilden, R., & Bell, D. (2002). Researching effective pedagogy in the early years (Research Report No. 356). Department for Education and Skills. https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/id/eprint/4650/1/RR356.pdf

Wood, E. (2014). Free choice and free play in early childhood education: Troubling the discourse. International Journal of Early Years Education, 22(1), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2013.830562

Zeichner, K., & Liston, D. (2013). Reflective teaching: An introduction (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-18

How to Cite

Popa, M. (2025). Between Structure and Creativity – Romanian Kindergarten Teachers’ Professional Reasoning in Selecting Didactic Strategies. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 17(4), 153-170. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/17.4/1051

Issue

Section

Psycho-Social Competencies & Educational Strategies