Transfer of Social Facilities from Social Responsibility Policies of Companies into Collective Labor Agreements
Keywords:
corporate social responsibility, collective bargaining agreementAbstract
Since the second half of the twentieth century, in the liberal world economy, the idea has emerged that the benefit of entrepreneurs must be harmonized with environmental protection, safety and health measures for workers and the provision of extra-wage earnings. This 'fad' - underpinned by the philosophy of human rights and the ideology of sustainable development - is called 'corporate social responsibility' (CSR). Initially developed as an economic practice in the United States, corporate social responsibility has become a general hallmark of economic activities across the globe. In Romania, the most popular CSR measures are: meal vouchers, medical fringe benefits, training programmes and covering the costs of professional certifications, flexible working hours or working from home, access to gyms and lifestyle benefits, bonuses and bonuses, company car, holiday vouchers, mobile phones and high-performance laptops.
References
Anca, C., Aston, J., Stanciu, E., & Rusu, D. (2011). Responsibilitate Socială (Corporativă) în România. Raport realizat în cadrul proiectului „Întărirea capacităţii companiilor româneşti de dezvoltare a parteneriatelor sociale – RSC”, Bucureşti, 2011. http://www.csrmedia.ro/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Analiza-Situatiei-RSC-in-Romania-RO1.pdf
Bocancea, C. (2011). Dimensiunea contextuală a asistenţei sociale. In G. Neamţu (coord.), Tratat de asistenţă socială, ediţia a II-a. Editura Polirom.
Bowen, H. R. (2013). Responsibilities of the Businessman. University of Iowa Press.
Cadet, I. (2014). Responsabilité sociale de l’entreprise (RSE), responsabilité éthiques et utopies. Les fondements normatifs de la RSE, Etude de la place du droit dans les organisations. Gestion et management. Conservatoire national des arts et metiers - CNAM, 2014. Français. NNT : 2014CNAM0947.
Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G
Carroll, A. B., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2008). Business & Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management. Cengage Learning.
Câmpeanu, V. (2016). Spre o economie circulară în Uniunea Europeană – o soluţie pentru revigorarea economiei. Open Academic Journal Index. http://oaji.net/articles/2016/3365-1480933922.pdf
Ciudin, M. (2019). Top 10 beneficii extrasalariale. Calculator venituri. https://www. calculatorvenituri.ro/top-10-beneficii-extrasalariale-acordate-de-angajatori#h_ 943542988421576487022251
Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analysing and evaluating corporate social performance. The Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92-117. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9503271994
Comisia Europeană. (2014). Comunicarea Comisiei Europene Spre o economie circulară: un program deşeuri zero pentru Europa (COM/2014/0398final). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/RO/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52014DC0398R(01)&from=FI
Commission des Communautés Européennes. (2006). Mise en oeuvre du partenariat pour la croissance et lʼemploi: faire de lʼEurope un pôle dʼexcellence en matière de responsabilité sociale des enterprises. Bruxelles, le 22.3.2006, COM(2006) 136 final. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/FR/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52006DC0136
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.
Freeman, R. E., & Reed, D. L. (1983). Stockholders and Stakeholders: A New Perspective on Corporate Governance. California Management Review, 25(3), 88–106. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165018
Gîlcă, C. (2012). Noi teorii in dreptul muncii (IV) - Originea contractului individual de munca: statutele breslelor. Dreptonline. http://www.dreptonline.ro/articole/articol.php?id_articol=66
Hristea, A. M. (2011). Responsabilitatea socială corporativă – între deziderat şi realitate.Economie teoretică şi aplicată, XVIII, 10(563), 56-73. http://store.ectap.ro/articole/650_ro.pdf
Jbara, N. (2017).Perspective historique de la responsabilité sociale des entreprises (RSE). Revue multidisciplinaire sur l'emploi, le syndicalisme et le travail, 11(1), 86-102, https://doi.org/10.7202/1043839ar
Jones, M. T. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory. A synthesis of ethics and economics. The Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404-437. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9507312924
Neacşu, I. (2000). Noi interpretări ale Eidos-ului capitalismului din perspectiva concepţiei sociologice a lui Max Weber. Revista Română de Sociologie, serie nouă, XI(5-6), 449-460. https://www.revistadesociologie.ro/pdf-uri/nr.5-6-2000/Iulian%20Neacsu%20art5.pdf
Organisation Internationale de Normalisation. (2014). ISO 26000: 2010, Lignes directrices relatives à la responsabilité sociétale. Genève, 2014. https://www.iso.org/fr/standard/42546.html
Organisation Internationale du Travail. (2017). Déclaration de principes tripartite sur les entreprises multinationales et la politique sociale. Genève, Cinquième edition, 2017. https://www.ilo.org/empent/Publications/WCMS_124923/lang--fr/index.htm#:~:text=La%20D%C3%A9claration%20sur%20les%20EMN,durables%20en%20milieu%20de%20travail.
Parlamentul României. (2003).Legea nr. 53/2003 - Codul muncii. Monitorul Oficial al României, Partea I, nr. 72 din 5 februarie 2003, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, republicată în Monitorul Oficial, nr. 345 din 18 mai 2011.http://legislatie.just.ro/Public/DetaliiDocumentAfis/41625
Parlamentul României. (2011). Legea dialogului social nr. 62 din 10 mai 2011. Monitorul Oficial al României, Partea I, nr. 322 din 10 mai 2011. http://legislatie.just.ro/Public/DetaliiDocument/128345
Parlamentul României. (2011). Legea nr. 287 din 17 iulie 2009, publicată în Monitorul Oficialal României, Partea I, nr. 511 din 24 iulie 2009; a fost modificată prin Legea nr. 71/2011 şi rectificată în Monitorul Oficial al României, Partea I, nr. 427 din 17 iunie 2011 şi în Monitorul Oficial al României, Partea I, nr. 489 din 8 iulie 2011. https://www.aegrm.ro/lege-nr-287-din-17-iulie-2009-republicata
Păun, A. (2015). Beneficii acordate de angajatorii romani comparativ cu practicile din regiune. Accace.ro. http://accace.ro/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2015/07/RO-2015-07-23-Beneficii-acordate-de-angajatorii-romani-comparativ-cu-practicile-din-regiune-RO.pdf
SanoPass. (n.d.). Beneficii extrasalariale medicale şi de lifestyle. https://companii.sanopass.ro/beneficii-extrasalariale-medicale-si-de-lifestyle
Sethi, S. P. (1975). Dimensions of Corporate Social Performance: An Analytical Framework. California Management Review, 17(3), 58–64. https://doi.org/10.2307/41162149
Smith, A.(2011). Avuţia naţiunilor, trad. rom. de Monica Mitarcă. Editura Publica.
Stokkink, D. (coord.), (2010). La responsabilité sociétale: origine et définition dans le Les cahiers de la Solidarité, Bruxelles, mai 2010, p. 5. Pourlasolidarite. https://www.pourlasolidarite.eu/sites /default/files/publications/files/diversiterse_rseoriginedefinition.pdf
Touchelay, B.(2013). Histoire de la RSE. In N. Postel & R. Sobel (dir.), Dictionnaire critique de la RSE. Presses universitaires du Septentrion.
Voiculescu, N., & Neagu, M. I. (2016). Responsabilitatea socială a întreprinderilor: de la concept la normativizare. Editura Universitară.
Voiculescu, N., & Neagu, V. (2016). Protecţia drepturilor lucrătorilor în dreptul internaţional şi european. Editura Universitară.
Weber, M. (1993). Etica protestantă şi spiritul capitalismului, trad. rom. de Alexandru Diaconovici. Editura Humanitas.
Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate Social Performance Revisited. The Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 691-718. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1991.4279616
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Anuarul Universitatii "Petre Andrei" din Iasi - Fascicula: Drept, Stiinte Economice, Stiinte Politice & LUMEN Publishing House
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
