Intertextuality as an Integral Component of the Modern Ukrainian Discourse (on the Example of Literary and Journalistic Styles)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/po/12.4/373Keywords:
Globalization, phenomenon of postmodernism, prototext, polydiscursivity of the text, interdiscursivity of the text, intertextual memory, precedent phenomenonAbstract
The article highlights the impact of globalization processes on formation of dominant worldviews and guidelines, as well as ways and means of representing the latter. The state and prospects of studying intertextuality as an important element of modern world discourses in the projection on the national cultural background are studied. Attention is drawn to the high degree of development of both theoretical and applied aspects of intertextuality of discourses by representatives of academic communities of different countries and fields of knowledge, which gave grounds to establish the polydiscursive and interdiscursive nature of the object of analysis. Orientation of domestic experts on parameterization of mainly specific manifestations of intertextuality within certain discourses at the level of isolated intertexts and presence of gaps in the theoretical description of the phenomenon in the context of national specificity is stated. Emphasis is placed on the definite variability of the terminology due to the interdisciplinary nature of discursiveness and, accordingly, intertextuality. A complementary link has been established between postmodernism as the dominant philosophical worldview and the intertextuality of discourses. The specifics of the intertextuality of contemporary Ukrainian literary discourse with regard to various scientific studies are clarified. The concept of “intertextual memory” is introduced and justification of its use is given. The need to apply the term “postmodern intertextuality” in relation to contemporary literary discourse is considered. The common and distinctive features of the manifestation of intertextuality in literary and journalistic discourses are traced. The specifics of intertextuality of Ukrainian journalistic discourse are described. It is established that the precedent character of the communicative act is of exceptional importance for realization of intertextuality in journalistic discourse.
References
Arutyunova, N. (1990). Diskurs [Discourse]. Lingvisticheskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar [Linguistic Encyclopedic Dictionary], 136–137. Sovetskaya entsiklopediya. http://tapemark.narod.ru/les/136g.html
Bacevych, F. (2004). Osnovy komunikatyvnoji linghvistyky [Fundamentals of communicative linguistics]. Akademija.
Barasheva, D., & Petrenko, N. (2017). Diskurs kak edinitsa poznaniya postmodernizma [Discourse as a unit of knowledge of postmodernism]. Sciences of Europe, 3(13), 47–52. http://www.europe-science.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/VOL-3-No-13-13-2017.pdf
Barthes, R. (1973). Texte théorie du [Theory of text]. Encyclopaedia universalis, 15, 78. https://www.universalis.fr/encyclopedie/theorie-du-texte/
Bell, A. (1996). Approaches to Media Discourse. Blackwell Publishers.
Bezrukov, A. (2018). Funktsii intertekstualnosti v predelah diskursivnoy praktiki [Functions of intertextuality within discursive practice]. Intertekstualnost hudozhestvennogo diskursa: sbornik materialov konferentsii [Intertextuality of artistic discourse: collection of conference materials]. Astrakhan.
Bilozub, A. (2011). Intertekstualnist u khudozhnomu postmodernomu dyskursi [Intertextuality in artistic postmodern discourse]. Linhvistychni studii [Linguistic studies], 23, 120–124. http://litmisto.org.ua/?p=9124
Bloom, H. (1973). The anxiety of influence: A theory of poetry. New York. Oxford University Press.
Bohdanova, I. (2016). Suhestyvnyi potentsial pretsedentnykh odynyts v ukrainskomu mediinomu dyskursi pochatku ХХІ stolittia [Suggestive potential of precedent units in the Ukrainian media discourse of the beginning of the XXI century] [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Ukraine Donetsk National University Vinnitsa. https://abstracts.donnu.edu.ua/article/view/2173
Bohovin, O. (2017). Kurtuaznyi kod v aspekti teorii intertekstu yak zasib interpretatsii khudozhnoho tvoru [Courtly code in the aspect of intertext theory as a means of interpretation of a work of art]. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni V. N. Karazina. Filolohiia [Bulletin of VN Karazin Kharkiv National University. Philology], 76, 214–217. https://periodicals.karazin.ua/philology/article/view/9221
Chernyavskaya, V. (2009). Lingvistika teksta: Polikodovost, intertekstualnost, interdiskursivnost [Linguistics of the text: Polycode, intertextuality, interdiscursiveness]. Librokom. https://www.studmed.ru/chernyavskaya-v-e-lingvistika-teksta-polikodovost-intertekstualnost-interdiskursivnost_69a8058992e.html
Derrida, Zh. (2000). O grammatologii [About grammar]. Ad Marginem.
Fedorova, O. (2007). Hendernyi ta kohnityvnyi aspekty doslidzhennia anhlomovnoho hazetnoho dyskursiv [Gender and cognitive aspects of the study of English-language newspaper discourses]. Naukovyi chasopys NPU imeni M. P. Drahomanova. Seriia 9. Suchasni tendentsii rozvytku mov [Scientific journal of NPU named after M.P. Drahomanov. Series 9. Current trends in language development], 2, 147–150. http://enpuir.npu.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/3498/1/fedorova.pdf
Golovinskyi, M. (2008). Intertekstualnist. Teoriia literatury v Polshchi. Antolohiia tekstiv. Druha polovyna 20 – pochatok 21 stolittia [Theory of literature in Poland. Anthology of texts. The second half of the 20th – the beginning of the 21st century], 284–309. Kyiv-Mohyla Academy.
Halych, V. (2015). Semiotyka intertekstualnosti publitsystychnoho tvoru: sotsialno-komunikatyvna retseptsiia: monohrafiia [Semiotics of intertextuality of a journalistic work: socio-communicative reception: monograph]. Luhansk Taras Shevchenko National University. http://dspace.luguniv.edu.ua/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/436/Galuch%20semiotika.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Harris, Z. (1952). Discourse analysis. Language, 28(1), 1–30. https://studylib.net/doc/25193085/discourse-analysis
Gurbanska, S. (2014). Postmodernistska model svitu v khudozhnomu dyskursi [Postmodern model of the world in artistic discourse]. Studia linguistica, 8, 350–353. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Stling_2014_8_57
Ilchenko, O. (2013). Intertekstualnist i pretsedentnist v ukrainomovnykh ZMI pochatku ХХІ stolittia (na materiali metaforychnykh slovospoluchen) [Intertextuality and precedent in the Ukrainian-language media of the early XXI century (on the material of metaphorical phrases)]. Linhvistychni doslidzhennia [Linguistic research], 35, 155–160. http://journals.hnpu.edu.ua/index.php/lingvistics/article/view/2452/2483
Kalenych, V. (2020). Intertekstualnist u suchasnomu mediadyskursi [Intertextuality in modern media discourse]. https://doi.org/10.30525/978-9934-588-37-2/7
Karpenko-Seccombe, T. (2016). Intertextuality as cognitive modelling. English Text Construction, 9 (2), 244–267. https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.9.2.02kar
Khant, H., & Razumna, K. (2019). Leksychni ta stylistychni osoblyvosti suchasnoho anhliiskoho ta nimetskomovnoho publitsystychnoho dyskursu [Lexical and stylistic features of modern English and German-language journalistic discourse]. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho universytetu. Filolohiia [Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod University. Philology], 1(41), 174–180. https://doi.org/10.24144/2663-6840.2019.1.(41).
Kolegaeva, I. (1991). Tekst kak edinitsa nauchnoy i hudozhestvennoy kommunikatsii [Text as a unit of scientific and artistic communication]. Twirpx. https://www.twirpx.com/file/2453799/
Kornetzki, A. (2013) Contrastive Analysis of News Text Types in Russian, British and American Business Online and Print Media. Frank & Timme.
Kristeva, J. (1967) Bakhtine, le mot, le dialogue et le roman. Critique, 23, 239, 438–465. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41557377
Matheson, D. (2011). Media Discourses: Analysing Media Texts (UK Higher Education OUP Humanities & Social Sciences Media, Film & Cultural Studies). Milton Keynes.
Matsko, V. (2010). Intertekstualnist poetychnykh struktur [Intertextuality of poetic structures]. Aktualni problemy ukrainskoi literaturi i folkloru [Current issues of Ukrainian literature and folklore], 15, 45–52. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/apulf_2010_15_8
Meinhof, U., & Smith, J. (2000). Intertextuality and the Media. From Genre to Everyday Life. Manchester University Press.
Mitosek, Z. (2005). Theories of literary research [Theories of literary research]. Tavria.
Moseichuk, O. (2012). Publitsystychnyi dyskurs yak kontekst realizatsii komunikatyvnoho vplyvu na masovoho adresata [Journalistic discourse as a context of realization of communicative influence on the mass addressee]. Visnyk Zhytomyrskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Filolohichni nauky [Bulletin of Zhytomyr State University. Philological sciences], 65, 174–177. http://eprints.zu.edu.ua/9237/1/34.pdf
Naumenko, A. (2005). Filolohichnyi analiz tekstu (Osnovy linhvopoetyky): navchalnyi posibnyk [Philological analysis of the text (Fundamentals of Linguopoetics): a textbook]. Nova Knyha.
Nerubasska, A., & Maksymchuk, B. (2020). The Demarkation of Creativity, Talent and Genius in Humans: a Systemic Aspect. Postmodern Openings, 11(2), 240-255. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/11.2/172
Nerubasska, A., Palshkov, K., & Maksymchuk, B. (2020). A Systemic Philosophical Analysis of the Contemporary Society and the Human: New Potential. Postmodern Openings, 11(4), 275-292. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/11.4/235
Orlandi, E. P. (1999). K voprosu o metode i ob'ekte analiza diskursa [On the question of the method and object of discourse analysis]. In Kvadratura smyisla [Squaring of Meaning] (pp. 197–225). Progress.
Perelomova, O. (2008). Intertekstualnist – strukturna oznaka tekstiv ukrainskoho postmodernoho khudozhnoho dyskursu [Intertextuality is a structural feature of texts of Ukrainian postmodern artistic discourse]. Visnyk Sumskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Filolohiia [Bulletin of Sumy State University. Philology], 1, 174–180. https://ukrlit.net/article1/1709.html
Perelomova, O. (2008). Linhvokulturni kody intertekstualnosti ukrainskoho khudozhnoho dyskursu: diakhronichnyi aspekt: monohrafiia [Linguocultural codes of intertextuality of Ukrainian artistic discourse: diachronic aspect: monograph]. SumDU Publishing House.
Piegay-Gros, N. (1996). Introduction à L'intertextualité. Lettres Sup, Collection Lettres supérieures. Dunod. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/278779810_Introduction_a_l'Intertextualit
Riabinina, O. (2008). Intertekstualnist u dyskursi suchasnoi ukrainskoi presy: linhvistychnyi aspekt [Intertextuality in the discourse of the modern Ukrainian press: linguistic aspect] [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Kharkiv National University.
Riffaterre, M. (1978). The Intertextual Unconscious. Critical Inquiry, 13(2), The Trial(s) of Psychoanalysis, 13(2), 371-385. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1343499
Schank, R., & Abelson, R. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: an inquiry into human knowledge structures. Erlbaum.
Shalaev, V. (2008). Globalizaciya, postmodern, bifurkacionnyj chelovek – markery perekhodnoj istorii [Globalization, postmodernity, bifurcation man are markers of a transitional history]. Servis PLUS. Sociologicheskie teorii obshchestva [Service PLUS. Sociological Theories of Society], 2, 96–105. https://readera.org/140209785
Shalimova. G. S. (1996). Forma novaya – problemy staryye (Ob odnoy modeli gazetnogo zaglaviya) [The form is new – the problems are old (On one model of a newspaper title). Zhurnalistika i kultura russkoy rechi [Journalism and the culture of Russian speech], 1, 81.
Shystovska, A. (2017). Poniattia intertekstualnosti ta pidkhody do noho [Shistovskaya, A. (2017). The concept of intertextuality and approaches to it]. Problemy teorii literatury ta literaturnoi krytyky [Problems of literary theory and literary criticism], 24, 51–59. https://doi.org/10.18524/2312-6809.2017.24.127980
Solganik, G. (2000). Stilistika teksta [Stylistics of the text.]. Flinta; Nauka.
Sologub, L. (2015). Nauchno-didakticheskiy diskurs: konstitutivnyie parametryi [Scientific and didactic discourse: constitutive parameters]. Filologiya i literaturovedenie [Philology and Literary Studies], 5. https://philology.snauka.ru/2015/05/1436
Tykha, U., & Kuravska, N. (2020). Aliuzyvno-tsytatnyi vymir intertekstualnosti postmodernistskoho khudozhnoho tekstu [Allusive-quoted dimension of intertextuality of postmodernist artistic text]. Aktualni pytannia humanitarnykh nauk [Current issues of the humanities], 2(31), 271–277. https://doi.org/10.24919/2308-4863.2/31.213993
Vivat, H. (2011). Folklornyi intertekst u tvorchomu dorobku I. Kalyntsia ta I. Svitlychnoho [Folklore intertext in the creative work of I. Kalynets and I. Svitlychny]. Filolohichni traktaty [Philological treatises], 3(4), 10–14. https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/27826
Voronovska, L. (2015). Universalni ta spetsyfichni osoblyvosti vyznachennia oznak khudozhnoho dyskursu [Universal and specific features of determining the features of artistic discourse]. Teoretychna i dydaktychna filolohiia [Theoretical and didactic philology], 20, 155–166. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Tidf_2015_20_17
Zavhorodnia, L. (2009). Tekstoznavstvo: navchalno-metodychni rekomendatsii do kursu [Textology: educational and methodical recommendations for the course]. Brama-Ukraina.
Zrazhevska, N. (2010). Komunikatsiini tekhnolohii [Communication technologies]. Brama-Ukraina.
Zubrytska, M. (1996). Slovo. Znak. Dyskurs. Antolohiia svitovoi literaturno-krytychnoi dumky XX stolittia [Word. Sign. Discourse. Anthology of world literary and critical thought of the XX century]. Lviv: Litopys. Retrieved from https://www.studmed.ru/zubricka-m-red-slovo-znak-diskurs-antolog-ya-sv-tovo-l-teraturno-kritichno-dumki-xx-st_2cbb4e2a329.html
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Postmodern Openings Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND
