The Consumers’ Rational Choices - Philosophic and Economic Perspectives
Keywords:
rational decision, purpose of choosing, predicted ways, consumer behavior, mutual benefits.Abstract
Nowadays, there is a wide range of products and services on different markets and also a complex business environment, full of challenges and in permanent movement; the consumer must make choices depending on his current and perspective general and specific needs and these are based on the ratio cost/ benefit and the allotted budget. There are a number of factors influencing the consumer’s decision, amongst which we can mention: axiological, psychological, social and economic factors. We will perform an incursion in the philosophical sphere and we’ll focus on the way in which the goals of the consumers’ actions can be considered rational. In the second part of the paper we deal with the effective decisions over the selection of the desired product and service, a choice to be made in a short time in terms of risks and challenges, an action leading to the consumer satisfaction and to continuing activities.References
Apostu, I., 2012, „Consensual Union in Romania: legalization, value, conflict and consequences”, European Journal of Science and Theology, Vol. 8, Supplement 1, pp. 303-312.
Apostu, I., 2013, „The Traditionalism of the Modern Family - Social and Legal Direction and Contradiction”, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 92, pp. 46-49.
Apostu, I., 2016, „Infidelity - the Imorality of the Other”, Revista Românească pentru Educaţie Multidimensională, Volume 8, Issue 1, june, pp. 7-10.
Becker, Gary S., 1994, Comportamentul uman, o abordare economica (Human behavior, an economic approach), ALL Publishers, Bucureşti.
Chen, L., Kok, G., Tong, J. D., 2013, „The effect of payment schemes on inventory decisions: The role of mental accounting”, in Management Science, vol. 59, no.2, pp.436-451.
Eşi, M. C., 2015, Formulating the mission of business organization by reference to the economic market requirements. Procedia Economics and Finance, 20, 201-207.
Eşi, M. C., 2016, Promoting the Human Values Beyond Prejudice and Stereotypes., Petroleum-Gas University of Ploiesti Bulletin, Educational Sciences Series 62, 1380-1385.
Ho, T-H., Lim, N., Cui, T. T., 2010, „Reference dependence multilocation newsvendor model: A structural analysis”, in Management Science, 56 (11), pp. 1891-1910.
Lipovetsky, G., 1996, Amurgul datoriei Etica nedureroasă a noilor timpuri democratice, Editura Babel, Bucureşti.
Lurie, N. H. & Swaminathan, J. M., 2009, „Is timely information always better? The effect of feedback frequency on decision making”, in Organizational Behavior. Human Decision Processes, 108 (2), pp. 315-329.
Marga, A., 1991, Raţionalitate, comunicare, argumentare, Editura Dacia, Cluj Napoca, pp. 226-227.
Popa, F., 2010, „Modele de decizie raţională: criterii formale şi norme”, Cogito, Issue 1, available at: http://cogito.ucdc.ro/nr_3/10% 20%20MODELE%20DE%20DECIZIE%20RATIONALA%20_rom.pdf.
Popa, F., 2010, „Spaţiul de indeterminare al raţionalităţii”, Revista Cogito, Volume III, Issue 3, septembrie.
Popper, K., 1998, În căutarea unei lumi mai bune. Conferinţe şi eseuri din trei decenii, Editura Humanitas, Bucureşti.
Posteucă, N. L., 2013, „Organizational Culture and Entrepreneurial Performance in Business Administration”. Annals of "Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava. 69-77.
Sandu, A., 2016, Social Construction of Reality as Communicative Action, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 1 st Unabridged Edition, Cambridge.
Schwartz, A., 2015, „Regulating for Rationality”, Stanford Law Review, vol. 67, issue 6, pp. 13-73.
Searle, J., 2002, Rationality in Action, MIT Press, Cambridge.
Shugan, Steven M., 2006, „Are consumers rational? Experimental Experience?”, in Marketing Science, vol. 25, no. 1, January-February, pp.1-7.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Anuarul Universitatii "Petre Andrei" din Iasi - Fascicula: Drept, Stiinte Economice, Stiinte Politice

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).